Scheme 3. Synthesis of Compound 14
cesses that could lead to the synthesis of hamigeran B and
various congeners. We describe herein our progress toward
that goal.
Scheme 2
Our original plan called for the synthesis of 14, whose
enolic hydroxy group would be activated in some way to
allow elimination, but we realized that enol could also
function as a nucleophile, as will be seen. The synthesis of
5
1
4 is shown in Scheme 3. The readily available ester 8 was
reduced with DIBAL and oxidized to the corresponding
aldehyde with excess MnO in excellent overall yield. A
Stille coupling with tributylvinyl stannane gave 10, which
2
center bearing the isopropyl group will be destroyed, for this
could also be prepared by a Suzuki coupling with the pinacol
particular purpose the relative stereorelationships in 14 are
not of importance.
6
12
boronate ester of vinyl boronic acid in high yield. The
7
reaction of 10 with the dithiane organolithium 11 led to
We did, in fact, prepare the triflate of 14 and treat it with
various bases to attempt cyclopentadienone formation, but
none of these experiments were productive. However, we
the ketol 12 after hydrolysis in 56% yield. Oxidation of this
8
compound with IBX afforded the dione 13, which was
9
13
cyclized according to the Tius protocol by treatment with
were inspired by a paper by Widenhoefer concerning the
LiTMP from -78 °C to room temperature affording 14 in
intramolecular oxidative cyclization of simple alkenes with
ꢀ-diketones. We thus treated 14 under the Wacker reaction
conditions associated with this process and were pleased to
find that cyclization occurred smoothly to afford 17 in high
yield. The process presumably took place via nucleophilic
attack of the enol of 14 on the styryl double bond, which
had been activated by Pd(II) as in the case of 15. Palladium
hydride elimination from 16 then afforded 17. Regeneration
of Pd(II) took place by the typical Cu(I) to Cu(II) cycle
illustrated in Scheme 4. It is noteworthy that the use of
R-hydroxyenones as nucleophiles is rather rare, and we
venture to anticipate that many other opportunities to discover
10
5
9% yield. The relative stereochemistry of 14 was assigned
on the basis of the anticipated stereochemistry of the
intermediate enolate and the selection rules for electrocyl-
ization, which call for a conrotatory ring closure in Nazarov
1
1
and related cyclizations. However, since the stereogenic
(
3) For a review of the area, see: (a) Clive, D. L. J.; Wang, J. Org.
Prep. Proced. Int. 2005, 37, 1. For relevant work appearing after the review,
see: (b) Miesch, L.; Welsch, T.; Rietsch, V.; Miesch, M. Chem.sEur. J.
2
009, 15, 4394. (c) Taber, D. F.; Tian, W. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7560.
(
d) Arnaiz, E.; Blanco-Urgoiti, J.; Abdi, D.; Dominguez, G.; Castells, J. P.
J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 2431. (e) Trost, B. M.; Pissot-Soldermann,
C.; Chen, I. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 951. (f) Sperry, J. B.; Wright, D. L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 411.
1
4
their synthetic utility exist.
(
4) Zheng, P.; Harmata, M. Unpublished results from these labora-
tories.
Compound 17 was actually obtained as a mixture of the
dione containing varying amounts of the enol 18, and
isomerization with triethylamine in the presence of some
silica gel to give 18 proved relatively facile (Scheme 5).
(
(
(
5) Harmata, M.; Hong, X. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2201.
6) See Supporting Information.
7) Kayser, M. M.; Zhao, H.; Chen, G.; Feicht, A. ARKIVOC (Gaines-
Ville, FL, U.S.) 2002, 12, 47.
(
(
8) Moore, J. D.; Finney, N. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3001.
9) (a) Batson, W. A.; Sethumadhavan, D.; Tius, M. A. Org. Lett. 2005,
7
2
, 2771. (b) Uhrich, E. A.; Batson, W. A.; Tius, M. A. Synthesis 2006, 13,
(12) It is worth noting that a slight light broadening in the proton NMR
of 14 suggested hindered rotation, presumably about the bond between the
cyclopentyl and arene rings. This phenomenon has yet to be studied.
(13) (a) Pei, T.; Wang, X.; Widenhoefer, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 648. (b) Liu, C.; Wang, X.; Pei, T.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Chem.sEur.
J. 2004, 10, 6343.
139.
(
10) When the reaction was conducted with LiHMDS, the yield was
only 44%.
(
11) (a) Nakanishi, W.; West, F. G. Curr. Opin. Drug DiscoVery DeV.
2
009, 12, 732. (b) Tius, M. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2193. (c) Pellissier,
H. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6479. (d) Frontier, A. J.; Collison, C. Tetrahedron
(14) Trost, B. M.; Dong, G.; Wance, J. A. Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16,
6265.
2
005, 61, 7577.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 24, 2010
5669