Please d oC hn eo mt Ca do mj u ms t margins
Page 4 of 5
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
of excess hydrogen peroxide over an extended period. synergistic reactivity to maximize theirDOthI:e10ra.1p0e39u/tDic0CbCe0n4e97fi0tKs
Attempts to determine the identity of the decomposed Ir even in low-doses.
species were unsuccessful.
To confirm that H
This work was supported by the Welch Foundation (Grant
is responsible for catalyst decay, we No. E-1894) and NIH (Grant No. R01GM129276).
2
O
2
monitored the reaction of Ir3a with NaHCOO in the presence
of propyl sulfide as an antioxidant (Figure S15). After 18 h, our
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
NMR spectra showed that the sample containing nPr
contained significant amounts of Ir3a whereas the sample
without nPr S had nearly no detectable amounts of Ir3a
present. We verified that nPr S did not inhibit the Ir catalyst
activity so its role was primarily an H scavenger.
2
S still
2
2
O
2 2
Notes and references
We propose that the iridium-quinone and NaHCOO
reactions operate by several competing pathways. In our
tethered Ir3a catalyst, H O could form from reaction of O
2 2 2
(
1
1) Nidhi, K.; Julia, C.; Ryan, J. M. Biol. Chem. 2017, 398, 1209-
227.
with Ir3b, Ir3c or Ir3d (Scheme 3). Because the iridium and (2) Trachootham, D.; Alexandre, J.; Huang, P. Nat. Rev. Drug
quinone units are covalently linked, the rate of intramolecular Discov. 2009, 8, 579-591.
hydride transfer to reactivate the quinone unit (i.e., Ir3b (3)
Ir3c) is independent of catalyst concentration. Intermolecular
reactions between the Ir3a-Ir3d species are also possible but
Liu, Z.; Romero-Canelón, I.; Qamar, B.; Hearn, J. M.;
Habtemariam, A.; Barry, N. P.; Pizarro, A. M.; Clarkson, G. J.; Sadler,
P. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 3941-3946.
4) Suenobu, T.; Shibata, S.; Fukuzumi, S. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55,
747-7754.
(
less likely to occur at lower catalyst concentrations. In the
7
untethered Ir1/Q1 system, similar reaction pathways are
(
5) Kajetanowicz, A.; Milewski, M.; Rogińska, J.; Gajda, R.; Woźniak,
K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 626-638.
potentially accessible. However, the key difference is that
hydride transfer from Ir1-hydride to Q1 is a bimolecular
(
6)
Kubanik, M.; Lam, N. Y. S.; Holtkamp, H. U.; Söhnel, T.;
1
1,12
reaction and thus, this step is concentration dependent.
high catalyst concentrations, we propose that the above
transfer hydrogenation process to generate H
important than the autocatalytic reaction between (8) Ngo, A. H.; Do, L. H. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 583-591.
hydroquinone and O
. In fact, studies by Suenobu/Fukuzumi (9) Bose, S.; Ngo, A. H.; Do, L. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139,
792-8795.
At
Anderson, R. F.; Jamieson, S. M. F.; Hartinger, C. G. Chem. Commun.
2
018, 54, 992-995.
2 2
O
is less (7) Ngo, A. H.; Ibañez, M.; Do, L. H. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 2637-2641.
2
8
and co-workers showed the rate of H
10) Mandal, K.; Bansal, D.; Kumar, Y.; Rustam; Shukla, J.;
Mukhopadhyay, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 10607-10619.
11) Liu, Z.; Deeth, R. J.; Butler, J. S.; Habtemariam, A.; Newton, M.
E.; Sadler, P. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4194-4197.
12) Komatsu, H.; Shindo, Y.; Oka, K.; Hill, J. P.; Ariga, K. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 3993-3995.
13) Maenaka, Y.; Suenobu, T.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
012, 134, 9417-9427.
(14) Maenaka, Y.; Suenobu, T.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2 2
O formation was
(
dependent only on the concentrations of Q1 and O
iridium or NADH (when [Q1] > [Ir]). They established that
reaction of hydroquinone and O followed a sigmoidal curve,
2
2
and not
4
(
which is indicative of autocatalysis. Our observation that Ir3a is
more efficient at low concentration whereas Ir1/Q1 is more
efficient at high concentration is consistent with a switch in
major vs. minor reaction pathways. More detailed kinetic
studies, however, are needed to interrogate this hypothesis.
(
(
2
In summary, we showed for the first time that 2012, 134, 367-374.
organoiridium-quinone conjugates are more efficient H
(15) Matsubara, C.; Kawamoto, N.; Takamura, K. Analyst 1992,
17, 1781-1784.
16) Dickinson, B. C.; Huynh, C.; Chang, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
010, 132, 5906–5915.
17) Gay, C.; Collins, J.; Gebicki, J. M. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 273,
49-155.
18) Baga, A. N.; Johnson, G. R. A.; Nazhat, N. B.; Saadalla-Nazhat,
R. A. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1988, 204, 349-353.
19) Onoda, M.; Uchiyama, T.; Mawatari, K.-i.; Kaneko, K.;
2 2
O -
1
generating catalysts than iridium and quinone tandem
catalysts at low concentrations (<50 µM). We expect that
inside living cells, the hydrogen peroxide produced by Ir3a
would likely be scavenged by reactive biomolecules such as
glutathione before having the opportunity to degrade the
catalyst as observed in the reaction flask. Although we were
(
2
(
1
(
2 2
able to achieve up to ~4.9-fold increase in H O formation
(
using Ir3a, we anticipate that further optimization of the Nakagomi, K. Anal. Sci. 2006, 22, 815-817.
iridium-quinone construct could lead to even greater rate (20) Shibata, S.; Suenobu, T.; Fukuzumi, S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
enhancements. Our results could have important biological 2013, 52, 12327-12331.
(
21) Hong, Y.; Sengupta, S.; Hur, W.; Sim, T. J. Med. Chem. 2015,
58, 3739-3750.
22) Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Wu, X.; Wu, Y.; You, Q.; Zhang, X. Org.
Lett. 2018, 20, 3635-3638.
relevance because these studies were performed under
ambient3 rather than oxygen-enriched environments.
20
(
Because some of the most potent quinone-based anti-cancer
agents have 50% growth inhibition concentrations below 50
(
23) Liu, Z.; Sadler, P. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1174-1185.
2
1,22
µM,
allow them to fully exploit their autocatalytic H
capabilities. Thus, our strategy of combining half-sandwich
they are not typically used in amounts that would
2 2
O
forming
4
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins