View Article Online
reaction. A variety of 2- and 4-substituted benzaldehydes (1)
have been employed and aldol products 2 were obtained in good
yields (61–94%) and reasonable enantioselectivities (61–93%
ee).
The recovered catalyst was reused and only a slight decrease
of the chemical yields as well as enantioselectivities was
observed, except for p-cyano (from 70 to 46% ee) and o-nitro
Table 3 Proline-catalysed (30 mol%) aldolisation of p-CF
with cyclopentanone (entry 1), cyclohexanone (entry 2) and cyclobutanone
entry 3)
3
-benzaldehyde
(
b
Entry
Yield (%)a
de (%) (anti+syn)
ee (%)
1
2
3
a
94
91
53
1+1
20+1
6+1
32 (anti)
8
6 (syn)
(
from 82% to 54% ee), where a significant drop of enantiose-
93 (anti)
n.d. (syn)
10 (anti)
lectivity was observed (entries 14 and 20). We do not have any
reasonable explanation for this drop in selectivity. The reaction
of 1-naphthalene-carbaldehyde with acetone gave, under the
same conditions, aldolisation product in 55% yield and 68% ee
compared to the 54% yield and 77% ee described for
DMSO.5
8
(syn)
Isolated yields after chromatography. b According to NMR spectra of
crude reaction mixtures.
c,d
We next examined the influence of catalyst amount in the
case of p-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde (Table 2). No reaction
took place in the absence of proline (entry 1). The same result
was obtained with 10 mol% of proline compared to the reaction
catalysed by 30 mol% of proline (entry 2). With 5 mol% of
catalyst, the product yield remained at a comparable level, but
with 1 mol% of catalyst the drop in reactivity was more
significant (entries 3 and 4). In all cases the enantioselectivity
was not affected (72–75% ee). Experiments with 1 mol% of (S)-
proline were repeated several times and a serious drop in yield
was observed after the third repetition (first reuse 75%, second
reuse 75%, third reuse 30%). Nevertheless, the enantioselectiv-
ity of the reaction was preserved (75% ee) even after the eighth
repetition. The addition of 0.5 mol% of catalyst to the reaction
medium returned the yield to the original value (74%).
Proline-catalysed reaction of p-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde
with butan-2-one was also investigated (Scheme 2). The desired
aldolisation product was isolated in 59% yield and 76% ee. The
reused catalytical system gave product in 52% yield and 71%
ee.
with cyclohexanone, after the product was extracted from the
ionic liquid, but the yield dropped to 67%. The diaster-
eoselectivity of the reaction with cyclobutanone (entry 3) was
reasonable, but enantioselectivity was, in this case, very low.
1
The ee of the products were determined solely by H-NMR
spectra using a chiral shift reagent because the product
decomposed upon transport for HPLC measurements in Koeln.
No reaction was observed with cycloheptanone.
Unfortunately, we were not able to detect aldol reaction
products with acetophenone, pentan-3-one, 3,3-dimethylbuta-
nal, dimedone and Meldrum’s acid. Only condensation products
and subsequent Michael addition by-products were detected
after the reactions under standard conditions.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the room tem-
6
perature ionic liquid [bmim]PF is a suitable solvent for proline-
catalysed asymmetric aldol reactions.
The catalyst immobilised in an ionic liquid phase is
recyclable and in many cases the product yield and enantiopur-
ity remained at a comparable level as in the case of the fresh
catalyst. Further investigations in this laboratory involve the
study of different proline-catalysed reactions in ionic liquids.
This work was supported by Comenius University grant
The reactions of p-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde with cyclo-
pentanone, cyclohexanone and cyclobutanone were also per-
formed. Surprisingly, very different results were obtained
9
8/2002/UK and VEGA grant 1/0072/03.
(
Table 3). The aldolisation of cyclopentanone resulted in ~ 1+1
mixture of anti- and syn-diastereomers, 32% ee for the anti-
diastereomer and 86% ee for the syn-diastereomer (entry 1).
However, cyclohexanone gave virtually pure anti-diastereomer
Notes and references
1
(a) Comprehesive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 2, ed. B.M. Trost, I. Fleming
and C.H. Heathcock, Pergamon, Oxford, 1991; (b) For a recent review
about asymmetric aldol reactions, see C. Palomo, M. Oiarbide and . J. M.
Garcia, Chem. Eur. J., 2002, 8, 36.
(
de > 20+1) with high enantiopurity (93% ee) (entry 2). An
attempt to reuse the catalytic system was made for the reaction
Table 2 Influence of catalyst amount on the reaction yield and enantiose-
2
3
(a) T. Mukaiyama, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 8609; (b) K. C. Nicolau, D.
Vourloumis, N. Winssinger and P. S. Baran, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 2000, 39, 44.
3
lectivity in the aldolisation of p-CF -benzaldehyde with acetone
(
S)-proline
(a) H. Gröger, E. M. Vogl and M. Shibasaki, Chem. Eur. J., 1988, 4,
Entry
(mol%)
Yield (%)a
ee (%)b
1
137; (b) T. D. Machajewski and C. H. Wong, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 2000, 39, 1352.
H. Gröger and J. Wilken, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 2001, 40, 529.
(a) B. List, Synlett, 2001, 1675; (b) B. List, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 5573;
1
2
3
4
0
10
5
0
92
89
74
4
5
72
74
75
(c) B. List, R. A. Lerner and C. F. Barbas III, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000,
1
1
22, 2395; (d) K. Sakthivel, W. Notz, T. Bui and C. F. Barbas III, J. Am.
a
Isolated yields after chromatography. b Determined by HPLC analysis
AD-H Chiralpak® column).
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 5260; (e) W. Notz and B. List, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2000, 122, 7386; (f) B. List, P. Pojarliev and C. Castello, Org. Lett., 2001,
(
3
, 573.
(a) J. D. Holbrey and K. R. Seddon, Clean Prod. Process., 1999, 1, 233;
b) K. R. Seddon, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 1997, 68, 351; (c) T.
6
(
Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2071; (d) P. Wasserscheid and W. Keim,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed Engl., 2000, 39, 3772; (e) R. Sheldon, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 2399; (f) C. M. Gordon, Appl. Catal., A, 2001, 222,
1
01.
C. P. Mehnert, N. C. Dispenziere and R. A. Cook, Chem. Commun, 2002,
610.
7
1
Scheme 2 Proline-catalysed aldol reaction of p-CF
butan-2-one in [bmim]PF
3
-benzaldehyde with
8 V. K. Aggarwal, I. Emme and A. Mereu, Chem. Commun., 2002,
1612.
6
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2510–2511
2511