M. G. Moloney et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 907–909
909
formation of any trapping adducts. Interestingly, the
Acknowledgements
reaction of 4-pentenoic acid 8a with lead tetraacetate in
benzene has been previously reported, but lactone 9
(R1=Me) was not among the identified products.22
We gratefully acknowledge the use of the EPSRC Chem-
ical Database Service at Daresbury,24 the EPSRC
National Mass Spectrometry Service Centre at Swansea,
and the EPSRC National X-ray Crystallographic Facility
at Southampton.
Of some interest is the mechanism of this reaction; as
indicated above, carbocation or radical intermediates are
possibilities. The formation of many of the observed
products (i.e. allylated compounds 2, a-carboxyl com-
pounds 6 and lactones 9 and 10) could be considered, by
analogy to literature precedent, to occur by a radical
mechanism, but the formation of others is more problem-
atic (e.g. 5a,b and 7b). When the reaction of lead
tetrabenzoate with 3-butenoic acid was conducted in the
presence of radical inhibitors such as galvinoxyl or
benzoquinone (0.1–0.2 equiv.), the product 2a (R1=Ph)
was still formed (40 and 27%, respectively), although these
yields are lower than in the absence of the trapping agents
(Table 1, entry 2). Similarly, reaction of 4-pentenoic acid
with lead tetrabenzoate in the presence of galvinoxyl or
benzoquinone (0.1–0.2 equiv.), gave lactone 9 (R1=Ph)
in 67 and 29%, respectively. Evidence against the inter-
mediacy of discrete carbocations or radicals came from
reactions performed in the presence of 1,1-diphenylethene
(1 equiv.); under these conditions, no products arising
from trapping were observed, with the diphenylethene
itself being in fact recovered and the expected products
2a or 9 still being formed (yield of 2a (R1=(MeO)2C6H3)
83%, recovery of alkene 66%; yield of 9 (R1=
(MeO)2C6H3) 29%, 100% recovery of alkene). These
results suggest that another mechanism may be operating,
and all of the above results could be neatly accommodated
by the intermediacy of a lead(IV) compound of type 11
which collapses in a one- or two-electron sense to give
ligand coupling leading directly to the observed products;
of interest is that the intermediacy of a lead species in
these types of reaction was suggested nearly 35 years ago,
but no structural details were given.23 Ligand coupling
for organolead(IV) carboxylates has been demonstrated
by Pinhey to be a facile process,5,6 but the possibility of
such a mechanism for the reactions of lead tetra-
carboxylates has hitherto not been considered. Unfortu-
References
1. Wiberg, K. B. Oxidation In Organic Chemistry; Academic
Press: New York, 1965; Vol. A.
2. House, H. O. Modern Synthetic Reactions; Benjamin:
Menlo Park, 1972; pp. 359–387.
3. Rubottom, G. M. In Oxidation in Organic Chemistry;
Trahanovsky, W. H., Ed.; Academic: London, 1982; Vol.
D, Chapter 1.
4. Sheldon, R. A.; Kochi, J. K. Org. React. 1972, 19, 279.
5. Pinhey, J. T. Aust. J. Chem. 1991, 44, 1353.
6. Pinhey, J. T. In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry
II; McKillop, A., Ed. Pergamon: Oxford, 1995; Vol. 11,
Chapter 11.
7. Buston, J. E. H.; Coop, A.; Keady, R.; Moloney, M. G.;
Thompson, R. M. J. Chem. Res. (M) 1994, 1101–1106.
8. Buston, J. E. H.; Claridge, T. D. W.; Moloney, M. G. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 639–641.
9. Buston, J. E. H.; Howell, H. J.; Moloney, M. G.; Poster,
V. Main Group Met. Chem. 1998, 21, 51–54.
10. Moloney, M. G.; Thompson, R. M.; Wright, E. Main Group
Met. Chem. 1996, 19, 133–137.
11. Moloney, M. G.; Paul, D. R.; Thompson, R. M. Main
Group Met. Chem. 1995, 18, 287–295.
12. Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 1811–1812.
13. Alder, K.; Schneider, S. Annalen 1936, 524, 189–202.
14. Criegee, R.; Kristinsson, H.; Seebach, D.; Zanker, F. Chem.
Ber. 1965, 98, 2331–2338.
15. Corey, E. J.; Gross, A. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21,
1819–1822.
16. Yamamoto, M.; Hirota, M.; Kishikawa, K.; Kohmoto, S.;
Yamada, K. Synthesis 1997, 937.
17. Typical experimental procedure: Vinylacetic acid or pent-4-
enoic acid (1 equiv.) and the lead(IV) tetracarboxylate (1
equiv.) were dissolved in dried toluene (15 ml) and the
solution stirred at 90°C for 3 h under argon. Excess solvent
was removed, the residue redissolved in petroleum ether or
ethyl acetate, filtered and the solution washed with 10%
sodium carbonate, dried and the solvent removed. The
crude product was purified by flash chromatography.
18. All new compounds gave satisfactory spectroscopic and
high resolution mass spectrometric or analytical data.
19. Allred, G. D.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 2748–2749.
1
nately, attempts to observe a species such as 11 by H
or 207Pb NMR spectroscopy has been unsuccessful. The
existence of such an intermediate could also account for
the difference in coupling observed with b-dicarbonyl
compounds depending on the chain length of the starting
unsaturated acid; for 11 (n=1), decarboxylation could
lead to a p-allyl type lead(IV) species, but for 11 (n=2),
decarboxylation could create a significantly less stabilised
s-lead(IV) species, which might be expected to collapse
to the observed products before further ligand exchange
with the b-dicarbonyl compound is possible.
20. Savarin, C.; Liebeskind, L. S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2149–2152.
21. Criegee, R. In Oxidation in Organic Chemistry; Wiberg, K.
B., Ed. Monograph; Academic: London, 1965; Vol. A,
Chapter 5.
22. Kochi, J. K.; Bacha, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33,
2746–2759.
23. Bacha, J. D.; Kochi, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 83–93.
24. Fletcher, D. A.; McMeeking, R. F.; Parkin, D. J. Chem.
Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 746–749.
Further investigations to validate these mechanistic ideas
and demonstrate the synthetic applications of this reac-
tion will be reported in due course.