Communication
therefore investigated the semi-hydrogenation of the
alcohol 26 formed by double deprotection of 25.
Pleasingly the use of Zn(Cu/Ag) couple in methanol
at above room temperature gave the desired (Z,Z,E)-
[27]
triene 27 in 80% yield. As before, the methyl ester
7 was readily transformed into the corresponding
2
amide target inthomycin A 1 via the pentafluoro-
1
phenyl ester 28. Careful analysis of the H and
13
C NMR spectra of 1 indicated that it was contami-
nated with a small amount (<10%) of inthomycin B
which appears to arise during conversion of the
2
ester 27 into inthomycin A 1.
All of our synthesized inthomycins had spectro-
scopic properties in accord with the natural and pre-
viously synthesized compounds. Importantly, the ab-
solute configuration of inthomycin C 1 has been the
subject of much confusion and debate in the litera-
ture. However, recently these ambiguities have been
[13b]
laid to rest by Hale and Hatakeyama
with the ab-
solute configuration of inthomycin C 1 being firmly
established as (R) confirming the original assignment
[3]
by Henkel and Zeek. We had assigned the absolute
configuration of the alkenyl iodides (Z)-5 and (E)-5 as
[28]
(
S) using Kakisawa’s extension of Mosher’s method
Scheme 3. Synthesis of inthomycins B and C. a) (Z)-17 or (E)-17, Pd(OAc)
THF, H O, 19 64%, 22 65%; b) HF·pyridine, CH CN, 08C to RT, 20 80%, 23 97%; c) LiOH,
O, THF, MeOH, 08C to RT; d) C OH, EDCI·HCl, DMAP, CH Cl , 21 80% (2 steps), 24
7% (2 steps); e) NH OH, THF, 08C to RT, 2 95%, 3 94%. EDCI=1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylami-
nopropyl)carbodiimide).
2 3 2 3
, PPh , Na CO ,
which translates into the absolute configuration of all
of the inthomycins being (R), and our optical rotation
for 3 was in agreement with the recently remeasured
2
3
H
8
2
6
H
5
2
2
4
[13b]
values.
(
E)-17 required further optimization. Ultimately, we found that
the concentration of aqueous base proved crucial with the use
of 0.25m sodium bicarbonate giving the coupled product 22
in 65% yield. In a similar manner to the synthesis of inthomy-
cin B 2, inthomycin C 3 was prepared from the triene 22 by
the same reaction sequence. Our synthetic inthomycin C 3 had
spectroscopic properties in accord with that of both natural
and synthetic inthomycin C 3.
Having successfully synthesized inthomycins B 2 and C 3 we
turned our attention to inthomycin A 1 (Scheme 4). We had
originally aimed to prepare inthomycin A 1 by the same strat-
egy namely Suzuki cross-coupling of a (Z,E)-dienylboronic acid
(
Z,E)-15, however, rhodium(I) catalyzed anti-selective hydrobo-
[
26]
ration of the enyne 6 gave the corresponding (Z,E)-dienyl-
boronic ester (Z,E)-15 in low yields (<40%) under a number of
conditions. We therefore altered our synthetic strategy and in-
vestigated a Sonogashira/semi-hydrogenation sequence. Pleas-
ingly, the Sonogashira reaction of the alkenyl iodide (Z)-17
with the enyne 6 proceeded smoothly under standard condi-
tions to give the coupled product 25 in 62% yield. The next
challenge was the semi-hydrogenation of the alkyne to give
the (Z,Z,E)-triene required for completion of the synthesis of in-
thomycin A. Semi-hydrogenation of 25 under a variety of con-
ditions [Pd, CaCO , quinoline; Pd, CaCO ; Pd, BaSO ; nickel
I
Scheme 4. Synthesis of inthomycin A. a) (Z)-17, Pd(PPh
b) HF·pyridine, CH CN, 08C to RT, 91%; c) Zn-Cu-Ag couple, MeOH, 358C,
0%; d) LiOH, H O, THF, MeOH, 08C to RT; e) C OH, EDCI·HCl, DMAP,
CH Cl , 78% (2 steps); f) NH OH, THF, 08C to RT, 89%.
3 4 3
) , CuI, Et N, 62%;
3
8
2
6 5
H
2
2
4
In summary, we have developed efficient modular enantiose-
lective total syntheses of all three inthomycins, which proceeds
in only 9/10 steps from commercially available materials. The
key steps include Suzuki and Sonogashira cross-couplings, and
an enantioselective Kiyooka aldol reaction. Our modular route
has allowed the efficient syntheses of these biologically active
3
3
4
boride; Zn (Cu/Ag)] gave mixtures of the desired product, over
reduced products and starting material and we were unable to
isolate the desired triene in synthetically useful yields. We
Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 1 – 5
3
ꢀ 2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
&
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ