Binuclear Macrocyclic Manganese(II) Complexes
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2000 883
microscope through an NEC X-ray detector and pulse processing system
connected to a Packard multichannel analyzer. Microanalyses were
carried out by the Chemical and Micro-Analytical Services (CMAS),
Melbourne, Australia. Room-temperature magnetic moments were
determined by the Faraday method. Diamagnetic corrections were made
using Pascal’s constants. Low-temperature magnetic susceptibility
measurements were carried out on a Quantum Design MPMS SQUID
magnetometer as described previously.12 Electrospray ionization mass
spectra were recorded either on a Micromass Platform QMS with an
electrospray source or on a Bruker BioApex 47e FTMS with a 4-7 T
superconducting magnet and an Analytica electrospray source.
ESR spectra were measured on a Bruker ECS 106 spectrometer as
frozen (99 K) DMF solutions using a concentration of 0.5 mM. To
follow the reactivity of Mn(II) complexes toward hydrogen peroxide,
solutions of the complexes were allowed to react with H2O2 in the ESR
tubes for a particular length of time. The solutions were frozen in liquid
nitrogen to quench the reaction and enable the ESR spectra to be
recorded. Following measurement of the ESR spectra, the solutions
were left to warm to room temperature and allowed to react further.
The solutions were frozen again and the ESR spectra re-recorded.
Electronic spectra were recorded on a Cary 3 spectrophotometer.
Changes in UV-visible spectra that occurred following addition of
aqueous hydrogen peroxide to the Mn(II) complexes (∼5 mM in DMF)
were monitored as a function of time using the kinetics accessory and
software package of the spectrophotometer.
Cyclic, square-wave, and steady-state voltammograms were recorded
on a Cypress CS 1090 system in dry, nitrogen-deoxygenated acetonitrile
solutions (∼0.5 mM) with tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (0.1 M)
as the supporting electrolyte. A platinum auxiliary electrode and an
Ag/Ag+ (10 mM AgNO3) reference electrode were used in combination
with either a platinum macrodisk working electrode (r ) 0.8 mm) for
cyclic and square-wave voltammetry or a platinum microelectrode (r
) 25 µm) for near-steady-state voltammetry conducted in an aluminum
Faraday cage. Potentials are reported relative to the ferrocene/
ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) couple. Reversible redox potentials (E1/2 values)
were determined from the cyclic voltammograms of the chemically
reversible processes as the midpoint between the oxidation (Epox) and
reduction (Epred) peak potentials, E1/2 ) 1/2(Epox + Epred). Confirmation
of electrochemical reversibility was established by verifying that the
E1/2 values calculated from a CV experiment were equal to the peak
potentials, Ep, of square-wave voltammograms. The E1/2 values were
also equal to the E1/2 values measured under steady-state conditions at
a microelectrode as the potential at half the limiting current value (IL/
2). The diffusion coefficient (D) was calculated from the limiting current
(IL) and the use of the relationship IL) 4nFCDr, where F ) Faraday’s
constant, C ) concentration, r ) radius of the microdisk electrode,
and n ) the number of electrons in the charge-transfer step.
Synthesis of complexes. (a) [Mn(dmptacn)Cl]ClO4 (1). Dmptacn
(1.50 g, 4.8 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (20 mL), and MnCl2‚4H2O
(0.95 g, 4.8 mmol) was added. A white solid precipitated on addition
of NaClO4 (1.0 g) to this solution. Recrystallization from an H2O/DMF
mixture afforded rectangular, colorless crystals suitable for X-ray
crystallography (yield 1.05 g, 44%). Anal. Calc for [Mn(C18H25N5)-
Cl]ClO4: C, 48.4; H, 5.6; N, 15.7. Found: C, 48.5; H, 5.7; N, 15.7.
Electron microprobe: Cl:Mn ratio 2:1. Selected IR bands (KBr, cm-1):
3336m, 2917m, 2858m, 1606m, 1491m, 1441m, 1144m, 1088vs,
1017m, 761m, 626s. Magnetic moment: µeff(296 K) ) 5.92 µB.
(b) [Mn2(tmpdtne)Cl2](ClO4)2‚2DMF (2). Tmpdtne (1.50 g, 2.3
mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (20 mL), and a slight excess of MnCl2‚
4H2O (0.96 g, 4.9 mmol) was added. The addition of NaClO4 (1.0 g)
to this brown solution resulted in the precipitation of a light brown
solid. This solid was recrystallized from an H2O/DMF mixture to afford
small, rectangular, colorless crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography
(yield 1.11 g, 41%). Anal. Calc. for [Mn2(C38H52N10)Cl2](ClO4)2‚2DMF:
C, 45.0; H, 5.6; N, 14.3. Found: C, 45.0; H, 5.6; N, 14.3. Electron
microprobe: Cl:Mn ratio 2:1. Selected IR bands (KBr, cm-1): 2917m,
2858m, 1665m, 1606m, 1491m, 1441m, 1367m, 1299m, 1144m,
1088vs, 1017m, 761m, 626s. Magnetic moment: µeff(296 K) ) 5.92
µB per Mn(II).
0.94 g (4.77 mmol) of MnCl2‚4H2O were used. Recrystallization from
a DMF/H2O mixture gave the product as a trihydrate (yield 1.21 g,
45%). Colorless crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography were
obtained on slow evaporation of a DMF/H2O solution of the compound.
Anal. Calc for [Mn2(C39H54N10)Cl2](ClO4)2‚3H2O: C, 42.7; H, 5.5; N,
12.8. Found: C, 43.3; H, 5.7; N, 13.2. Electron microprobe: Cl:Mn
ratio 2:1. Selected IR bands (KBr, cm-1): 3412vs, 2890w, 2853w,
1638m, 1607s, 1494m, 1442m, 1384m, 1299m, 1116s, 1083vs, 1013s,
780s, 628s. Magnetic moment: µeff(296 K) ) 5.94 µB per Mn(II).
(d) [Mn2(tmpdtnb)Cl2](ClO4)2‚DMF.2H2O (4). The synthesis was
as for 2 except that 1.3 g (1.93 mmol) of tmpdtnb and 0.80 g (4.06
mmol) of MnCl2‚4H2O were used. Recrystallization from a DMF/H2O
mixture gave the product as a mono(dimethylformamide) diaqua solvate
for which the analytical data given below were collected (yield 1.16 g,
50%). Colorless crystals of the tetrakis(dimethylformamide) triaqua
solvate, 4′, suitable for X-ray crystallography were obtained on slow
evaporation of a DMF/H2O solution of the compound. Anal. Calc for
[Mn2(C40H56N10)Cl2](ClO4)2.DMF‚2H2O: C 44.3, H 5.8, N 13.2;
found: C 44.2, H 5.7, N 13.3. Electron microprobe: Cl:Mn ratio 2:1.
Selected IR bands (KBr, cm-1): 3452s, 2925m, 2856m, 1668vs, 1606s,
1495m, 1441m, 1390m, 1309m, 1150m, 1102vs, 1015s, 766s, 624s.
Magnetic moment: µeff(296 K) ) 5.81 µB per Mn(II).
(e) [Mn2(tmpdtn-m-X)Cl2](ClO4)2.6H2O (5). The synthesis was as
for 2 except that 0.90 g (1.24 mmol) of tmpdtn-m-X and 0.52 g (2.61
mmol) of MnCl2‚4H2O were used. The product appeared as a brown
solid after recrystallization of the initial brown precipitate from a
mixture of DMF/H2O (yield 0.59 g, 38%). Anal. Calc. for [Mn2-
(C44H56N10)Cl2](ClO4)2‚6H2O: C, 43.6; H, 5.6; N, 11.6. Found: C, 43.5;
H, 5.0; N, 11.6. Electron microprobe: Cl:Mn ratio 2:1. ESI mass
spectrum (CH3CN), m/z: 1005.2, {[Mn2LCl2]ClO4}+; 452.2, {Mn2-
LCl2}2+. Selected IR bands (KBr, cm-1): 3417s, 3066w, 2919w,
2857m, 1657m, 1608s, 1486w, 1442m, 1384m, 1296m, 1090vs, 1016s,
763s, 626s. Magnetic moment: µeff(293 K) ) 5.83 µB per Mn(II).
(f) [Mn2(tmpdtnp-OH)Cl2](ClO4)2‚2H2O (6). The method used to
prepare 2 was followed except that 1.5 g (2.3 mmol) of tmpdtnp-OH
and 0.94 g (4.8 mmol) of MnCl2‚4H2O were used. Colorless crystals
of 6 were obtained on recrystallization from a CH3CN/H2O mixture
(yield 1.12 g, 45%). Anal. Calc for [Mn2(C39H54N10O)Cl2](ClO4)2‚2H2O:
C, 42.8; H, 5.3; N, 12.8. Found: C, 43.0; H, 5.4; N, 12.8. Electron
microprobe: Cl:Mn ratio 2:1. ESI mass spectrum (CH3CN), m/z 958.9,
{[Mn2LCl2]ClO4}+; 411.2, {Mn2LCl2}2+; and 274.5, {Mn2LCl}3+
.
Selected IR bands (KBr, cm-1): 3384s, 2919w, 2855w, 1608s, 1494m,
1440s, 1296m, 1149s, 1097vs, 1017s, 776m, 626m. Magnetic moment:
µeff(296 K) ) 5.80 µB per Mn(II).
Crystallography. Intensity data for colorless crystals of 1-3 and
4′ were measured on Siemens/Nicolet R3m and Rigaku AFC6R
diffractometers, respectively. Graphite-monochromatized Mo KR radia-
tion, λ ) 0.7107 Å, was used for 1, 2, and 4′, and Cu KR radiation, λ
) 1.542 Å, for 3. The ω-2θ (ω for 1) scan technique was employed
such that θmax was 22.5° for 1, 27.5° for 2 and 4′, and 60.1° for 3. The
data sets were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects,33 and an
empirical absorption correction was applied in each case.34 Relevant
crystal data are given in Table 1.
The structures of 2 and 4′ were solved by direct methods35,36 while
those of 1 and 3 were also solved by direct methods37 but expanded
using Fourier techniques.38 Each was refined by a full-matrix least-
squares procedure based on F 34 employing reflections that satisfied
(33) Walker, N.; Stuart, D. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1983, 39, 158.
XDISK: Diffractometer Data Reduction, Version 4.20PC; Siemens
Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc.: Madison, WI, 1991.
(34) teXsan: Structure Analysis Software; Molecular Structure Corporation,
the Woodlands, TX, 1985 and 1992.
(35) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS86: Program for the automatic solution of
crystal structure; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1986.
(36) Burla, M. C.; Camalli, M.; Cascarano, G.; Giacovazzo, C.; Polidori,
G.; Spagna, R.; Viterbo, D. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1989, 22, 389.
(37) Altomare, A.; Cascarano, M.; Giacovazzo, G.; Guagiardi, A. SIR92.
J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 343.
(38) Beurskens, P. T.; Admiraal, G.; Beurskens, G.; Bosman, W. P.; de
Gelder, R.; Israel, R.; R. O.; Smits, J. M. M. The DIRDIF-94 Program
System; Technical Report; Crystallography Laboratory, University of
Nijmegen: The Netherlands, 1994.
(c) [Mn2(tmpdtnp)Cl2](ClO4)2‚3H2O (3). The method used to
prepare 2 was followed except that 1.5 g (2.27 mmol) of tmpdtnp and