A.-N. M.A. Alaghaz et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 95 (2012) 414–422
421
4
.3.9. Thermal analyses
Thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermogravimetric
13. These quantum chemical calculations agree well with the
experimental findings of the spectral and magnetic observations.
(
DTG) analyses were carried out for Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) com-
plexes in ambient conditions. The correlations between the differ-
ent decomposition steps of the complexes with the corresponding
weight losses are discussed in terms of the proposed formula of the
Appendix A. Supplementary data
complexes. The thermal decomposition of [Co
plement Fig. S-9a) with the molecular formula [C32
Co ] proceeds with two main degradation steps. The first step
2 2
LCl ] complex (Sup-
2 8 2 2 4-
H20Cl N O P S
2
References
occurs within the temperature range 480–585 K with an estimated
mass loss 49.62% (calculated mass loss = 49.66%) which is reason-
[1] L. Stahl, Coord. Chem. Rev. 210 (2000) 203–250.
ably accounted for the loss of two molecules of C22
H
12
N
4
S
4
frag-
[2] T.A. Mohamed, W.M. Zoghaib, I.A. Shaaban, R.S. Farag, A.M.A. Alajhaz,
Spectrochim. Acta A 83 (2011) 304–313.
ment. The DTG curve gives an exothermic peak at 640 K (the
maximum peak temperature). The second step occurs within the
temperature range 590–790 Kwith an estimated mass loss 34.13%
[
3] H. Abdel–Wahab, A. Abdel-Fattah, M.Y. Gabr, Prog. Org. Coat. 69 (2010) 272–
77.
2
[4] W.-K. Wong, X.-P. Chen, T.-W. Chik, W.-Y. Wong, J.-P. Guo, F.-W. Lee, Eur. J.
Inorg. chem. 2003 (2003) 3505–3667.
(
calculated mass loss = 34.18%), which is reasonably accounted
[
5] T.M. El-Gogary, A.M.A. Alaghaz, R.A.A. Ammar, J. Mol. Struct. 1011 (2012) 50–
8.
for the loss of rest of the ligand molecule, leaving CoO as residue.
The DTG curve gives an exothermic peak at 700 K (the maximum
peak temperature). Total estimated mass loss is 83.75% (calculated
5
[6] P. Chandrasekaran, J.T. Mague, R. Venkateswaran, M.S. Balakrishna, Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem. 2007 (2007) 4988–4997.
[
7] M. Sakamoto, K. Manseki, H. Okawa, Coord. Chem. Rev. 219–221 (2001) 379–
14.
[8] H.B. Gray, B.G. Malmstroem, Biochemistry 28 (1989) 7499–7505.
9] V. Konar, O. Yı lmaz, A.I. Ozturk, S. Kı rbag, M. Arslan, Bioorg. Chem. 28 (2000)
14–225.
mass loss = 83.84%). The thermal decomposition of [Ni
complex (Supplement Fig. S-9b) with the molecular formula
Ni ] also proceeds with two main degradation
2 2
LCl ]
4
[
[
C
32
H20Cl
2
N
8
O
P S
2 2 4
2
2
steps. The first estimated mass loss of 24.44% (calculated mass
loss = 24.84%) within the temperature range 590–620 K could be
[
10] O. Yılmaz, F. Aslan, A.I. Ozturk, N. Vanlı, S. Kırbag, M. Arslan, Bioorg. Chem. 30
(2002) 303–314.
attributed to the liberation of C11
gives an exothermic peak at 590 K (the maximum peak tempera-
ture). The second step occurs within the temperature range 650–
H
6
N
2
S
2
fragment. The DTG curve
[11] M. Gleria, R.D. Jaeger, J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 11 (2001) 1–45.
12] C.D. Flint, E.H.M. Ibrahim, R.A. Shaw, B.C. Smith, C.P. Thakur, J. Chem. Soc. A
1971) 3513.
[13] A.L. Odom, A.F. Heyduk, D.G. Nocera, Inorg. Chim. Acta 297 (2000) 330–337.
[14] T. Kniess, R. Bergmann, M. Kuchar, J. Steinbach, F. Wuest, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
[
(
8
20 K with an estimated mass loss 59.00% (calculated mass
loss = 59.04%), which is reasonably accounted for the decomposi-
tion of remaining part of the ligand molecule (C21
1
7 (2009) 7732–7742.
15] W.-Y. Wong, W.-K. Wong, C. Sun, W.-T. Wong, J. Organomet. Chem. 612 (2000)
60–171.
[
2 6 2 2
H14Cl N P S )
1
leaving NiO as residue. The DTG curve gives an exothermic peak
at 760 K (the maximum peak temperature). Total estimated mass
loss is 83.84% (calculated mass loss = 83.88). The complex
[16] W.-K. Wong, X.-P. Chen, J.-P. Guo, Y.-G. Chi, W.X. Pan, W.-Y. Wong, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. (2002) 1139–1146.
[
17] D.F. Shriver, M.A. Drezdzon, The Manipulation of Air–Sensitive Compounds,
second ed., John-Wiley, New York, 1986.
[
Cu
2
LCl
2
] with the molecular formula [C32
H
20Cl
2
N
8
O
2
P
2
S
4
Cu
2
] is
[18] A.C. Chapmann, N.L. Paddock, H.T. Searle, J. Chem. Soc. 1825 (1961);
A.V. Kirsanov, I.N. Zhmurova, Zh. Obshch. Khim. 32 (1963) 2576–2588.
thermally decomposed in two successive decomposition steps
(
(
5
The DTG curve gives an exothermic peak at 553 K (the maximum
peak temperature). The second step occurs within the temperature
range 661–853 K with the estimated mass loss 48.54% (calculated
mass loss = 48.59%) which corresponds to the loss of
[
[
19] K. Gewald, E. Scinka, H. Bottcher, Chem. Ber. 99 (1966) 94–109.
20] M.J. Frisch, et al., Gaussian09, Revision A.02, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT,
2009.
Supplement Fig. S-9c). The first estimated mass loss of 34.38%
calculated mass loss = 34.41%) within the temperature range
40–590 K may be attributed to the loss of (C16H N S ) fragment.
10 4 2
[
[
[
21] A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 5648–5652.
22] C. Lee, W. Yang, R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 785–789.
23] P.J. Stephens, F.J. Devlin, C.F. Chabalowski, M.J. Frisch, Phys.Chem. 98 (1994)
11623–11627.
[24] M.E. Casida, in: D.P. Chong (Ed.), Recent Advances in Density Functional
Methods Part 1, World Scientific, Singapore, 1995.
[
[
25] R.E. Stratmann, G.E. Scuseria, M.J. Frisch, J Chem Phys. 109 (1998) 8218–8224.
26] A.M.A. Alaghaz, Reda A.A. Ammar, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010) 1314–1322.
16 10 4 2 2 2
C H N S Cl P fragment leaving CuO as residue. The DTG curve
gives an exothermic peak at 770 K (the maximum peak tempera-
ture). Total estimated mass loss is 83.00% (calculated mass
loss = 82.95%).
[27] B. Hoge, C. Thösen, T. Herrmann, P. Panne, I. Pantenburg, J. Fluor. Chem. 125
2004) 831–851;
(
P.R. Olivatoa, A. Rodriguesa, R. Rittner, J. Mol. Struct. 705 (2004) 91–99.
[
28] S. Chandra, L.K. Gupta, A.K. Sharma, Spectrochim. Acta A 60 (2004) 1563–1571.
The final product of decomposition at 875 K corresponds to the
formation of metal oxide as the end product, which was confirmed
by comparing the observed/estimated and the calculated mass of
the pyrolysis product. From the above thermogravimetric analyses,
the overall weight losses for the Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes
agree well with the proposed formulae obtained by elemental
analyses, IR, UV–Vis, H NMR, P NMR, Cyclic voltammetry, Mass,
and magnetic susceptibility measurements. Finally, the previous
findings indicated that the coordination occurs through the nitro-
gen of the pyridine ring and thiazole ring and the imine NH group
to give the structures shown in Supplement Fig. S-10.
[29] P.W. Alexander, R.J. Sleet, Aust. J. Chem. 23 (1970) 1183–1190.
[
[
31] N.N. Bhuvan Kumar, K.C. Kumara Swamy, Polyhedron 26 (2007) 883–890.
[32] M. Alecu, J. Zheng, Y. Zhao, D.G. Truhlar, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6 (2010)
872–2887.
33] R. Schoth, D. Sevenard, K. Pashkevich, G. Röschenthaler, Coord. Chem. Rev. 210
2000) 101–134.
2
[
(
1
31
[34] K. Nakamoto, Infrared and Raman Spectra of inorganic and coordination
compounds. Part B: applications in coordination, fifth ed., Organometallic and
Bioinorganic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1997.
[
35] W.W. Simons, The Sadtler Handbook of Infrared Spectra, Sadtler Research
Laboratories Inc., Pennsylvania, 1978.
[
36] W.-Y. Wong, X.-Z. Wang, Z. He, K.-K. Chan, A.B. Djuriši c´ , K.-Y. Cheung, C.-T. Yip,
A.M.-C. Ng, Y.Y. Xi, C.S.K. Mak, W.-K. Chan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007)
14372–14380.
[
37] W.-Y. Wong, C.-L. Ho, Acc. Chem. Res. 43 (2010) 1246–1256.
4
.3.10. Quantum chemical calculations on complexes
Geometry of Cu, Co and Ni complexes was investigated by semi-
[38] L. Li, C.-L. Ho, W-Y. Wong, J. Organomet. Chem. 703 (2012) 43–50.
[
[
39] W.-Y. Wong, K.-H. Choi, G.-L. Lu, Z. Lin, Organometallics 21 (2002) 4475–4481.
40] W. Wong, S. Chan, K. Choi, K. Cheah, W. Chan, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 21
empirical molecular orbital calculations using the PM3 Hamilto-
nian. The resulting structures prove square planar geometry for
Ni complex, distorted square planar geometry for Cu complex and
a tetrahedral geometry for the Co complex. These can be detected
in their optimized geometry present in Supplement Figs. S-11–S-
(
2000) 453–457.
[41] J. Yang, Z. Zhang, X. Xu, X. Zhu, X. Men, X. Zhou, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 643–
52.
[
[
6
42] X.F. He, C.M. Vogels, A. Decken, S.A. Westcott, Polyhedron 23 (2004) 155–160.
43] S. Chandra, A.K. Sharma, Spectrochim. Acta A 72 (2009) 851–857.
[44] D. Shukla, L. Kumar Gupta, S. Chandra, Spectrochim. Acta A 71 (2008) 746–750.