D. Ouyang et al. / Thermochimica Acta 513 (2011) 119–123
123
(4#) < KP/Mg–50%Al/ urotropine (2#). The order of the ignition
temperatures of the mixtures (Ti) is KP/Mg–50%Al/ urotropine (2#,
557.7 ◦C) > KP/Mg–50%Al/GN (3#, 553.6 ◦C) > KP/Mg–50%Al (1#,
538.8 ◦C) > KP/Mg–50%Al/NC (4#, 536.5 ◦C).
This study of pyrotechnic compositions is important not only
for understanding the characteristics of their thermal decom-
position, but also for assessing the degree to which additives
can affect their exothermic decomposition and ignition tempera-
tures. This information can lead to pyrotechnic compositions with
improved characteristics to mitigate potential hazards during han-
dling, usage, storage, and to knowledge on how to improve the
sensitivity of igniter compositions and reduce factors for accidents.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr. N.D. Hamer, L. Zheng, F. Wei and
H.Y. Liu for their help. Project supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 51076066) and the 2009
Innovation Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
of China (No. CX09B 105Z).
Fig. 5. Curves for pressure variation speed.
temperature of 14.8 ◦C above that of the pure KP/Mg–50%Al without
additives.
By replacing of GN with urotropine, the thermal stability of the
pyrotechnic mixture is increased further. The ignition temperature
of the mixture of KP/Mg–50%Al/ urotropine is increased to 557.7 ◦C.
For this mixture, the ignition temperature is ∼18.9 ◦C higher than
the pure KP/Mg–50%Al mixture.
The relationship of ignition temperatures (Ti) of
these mixtures is observed to be in the following order
KP/Mg–50%Al/urotropine (2#, Ti = 557.7 ◦C) > KP/Mg–50%Al/GN
(3#, Ti = 553.6 ◦C) > KP/Mg–50%Al (1#, Ti = 538.8 ◦C) > KP/Mg–
50%Al/NC (4#, Ti = 536.5 ◦C).
References
[1] A.P. Hardt, Pyrotechnics, Pyrotechnica Publications, USA, 2001.
[2] Y.Q. Huang, Chinese Patent CN 1490590A (2004).
[3] F.SH. Qui, United States Patent US 6718882B1 (2004).
[4] T. Kuwahara, J. Prot. Tech. 1 (1992) 2.
[5] I. Lee, S.A. Finnegan, J. Therm. Anal. 50 (1997) 707–717.
[6] T.K. Highsmith, C.S. Mcleod, R.B. Wardle, R. Hendrickson, WO Patent WO001408
(1999).
[7] M. Gao, C.Y. Sun, K. Zhu, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 75 (2004) 221–232.
[8] M. Gao, B.C. Ling, S.S. Yang, M. Zhao, J. Anal. Pyrol. 73 (2005) 151–156.
[9] E. Schering, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1 (1879) 175.
[10] E.L.M. Krabbendam-LaHaye, W.P.C. de Klerk, R.E. Krämer, J. Therm. Anal.
Calorim. 80 (2005) 495–501.
[11] S.M. Pourmortazavi, S.G. Hosseini, M. Rahimi-Nasrabadi, J. Hazard. Mater. 162
(2009) 1141–1144.
4. Conclusions
[12] GJB 5382.11-05, Test methods of physical parameter for pyrotechnic. Part 11.
Determination of Autoignition temperature-DTA and DSC method, 2005, pp.
56–59.
[13] GJB/J 3345-98, Verification regulation for measuring system of closed bomb of
propellants, 1999, pp. 1–6.
[14] S.M. Pourmortazavi, M. Fathollahi, S.S. Hajimirsadeghi, S.G. Hosseini, Ther-
mochim. Acta 443 (2006) 129–131.
[15] J.S. Lee, C.K. Hsu, K.S. Jaw, Thermochim. Acta 367–368 (2001) 381–385.
[16] J.H. McLain, Pyrotechnics From the Viewpoint Of Solid State Chemistry, Franklin
Institute, 1980.
Thermal behavior and combustion characteristics of pyrotech-
nic mixtures of KClO4/Mg–50%Al alloy in
a pure form and
with the different additives were studied by DTA–TG and
closed bomb methods. The results show (see Table 2) that
with the addition of additives the combustion pressure is
increased in the order KP/Mg–50%Al/NC (4#) > /Mg–50%Al/
urotropine (2#) > KP/Mg–50%Al/GN (3#) > KP/Mg–50%Al (1#),
but the order of ignition delay time (Tig) for these mixtures is
KP/Mg–50%Al (1#) < KP/Mg–50%Al/GN (3#) < KP/Mg–50%Al/NC
[17] F.S. Stone, Lattice defects in ionic crystals, in: W.E. Graner (Ed.), Chemistry of
the Solid State, London, 1955.