_
I. Özces¸meci et al. / Dyes and Pigments 92 (2012) 954e960
955
The aim of the present work was to synthesize a series of
metallo and metal-free phthalocyanines functionalized with
peripheral 1-pyrenylmethoxy substituents and to explore the
energy transfer between the Py units and the macrocyclic core. Py
has been chosen as a substituent for this study as it is a thermally
very stable unit which can act as an antenna to harvest and transfer
energy efficiently to longer wavelength emitters in blends or
composite structures [21]. Here we report the consequence of
1-pyrenylmethoxy substituent on the intensity of the fluorescence
emission spectra of metal-free and zinc Pcs as well as its effect on
energy transfer to phthalocyanine core.
(eNH), 3042 (AreH), 2948 (alkyl-CH), 1215 (CeOeC); 1H NMR
(d-DMSO): 8.24e7.33 (br, 48H, AreH), 5.90 (br s, 8H, OCH2), ꢁ4.05
(bs, 2H, eNH); UVeVis lmax (nm) (log ) in THF: 726 (5.14), 694
3
(5.13), 341 (5.27), 326 (5.18), 282 (5.13), 269 (4.95); Anal. calcd. for
C100H58N8O4; C, 83.66; H, 4.07; N, 7.81; found: C, 83.82; H, 4.16;
N, 7.68%. MS: m/z 1435.24 [M]þ.
2.2.3. Tetra(1-pyrenylmethoxy)phthalocyaninatozinc (II) (4)
A mixture 0.5 mmol (0.179 g) of 4-(1-pyrenylmethoxy)phtha-
lonitrile (2) and 0.125 mmol (0.023 g) of anhydrous Zn(OAc)2 with 2
drop DBU in 1.5 ml hexanol was heated and stirred at 160 ꢀC for 6 h
under N2 in a sealed tube. After cooling to room temperature, the
suspension was dissolved in 1 ml DMF and poured into 150 ml ice-
water mixture. After that, precipitated greeneblue solid was
filtered off. The precipitate was first refluxed in chloroform and
then washed subsequently with ethanol and acetone and then
dried in vacuo. Purification of the product was accomplished by
column chromatography on silica gel first with ethanol then with
2. Experimental
2.1. Equipments and materials
IR spectra were recorded on a PerkineElmer Spectrum One
FT-IR spectrometer, electronic spectra on a Scinco Neosys-2000
double-beam ultravioletevisible (UVevis) spectrophotometer
using 1 cm path length cuvettes at room temperature. Elemental
analyses were performed by the Instrumental Analysis Laboratory
of the TUBITAK Marmara Research Centre. 1H NMR spectra were
recorded on a Bruker 250 MHz spectrometer using TMS as internal
reference. Mass spectra were performed on Ultima Fourier Trans-
form and Varian 711 mass spectrometer. Fluorescence excitation
and emission spectra were recorded by using Varian Cary Eclipse
Fluorescence Spectrophotometer. All reagents and solvents were of
reagent grade quality obtained from commercial suppliers. All
solvents were dried and purified according to [22]. The homoge-
neity of the products was tested in each step by TLC (SiO2).
4-nitrophthalonitrile was prepared according to a reported proce-
dure [23]. 1-pyrenylmethanol (1) was prepared according to a re-
ported procedure [24].
THF as the eluent. Yield: 52 mg (27.8%); m.p. > 200 ꢀC. IR (cmꢁ1):
y
3037 (AreH), 2952 (alkyl eCH), 1215 (CeOeC); 1H NMR (d-DMSO):
8.24e7.71 (br, 48H, AreH), 5.95 (br s, 8H, OCH2); UVeVis lmax (nm)
(log ) in THF: 679 (5.21), 346 (5.39), 331 (5.27), 282 (5.16), 268
3
(4.97); Anal. calcd. for C100H56N8O4Zn; C, 80.13; H, 3.77; N, 7.48;
found: C, 80.22; H, 3.68; N, 7.54%. MS: m/z 1497.98 [M]þ.
2.2.4. Tetra(1-pyrenylmethoxy)phthalocyaninatonickel (II) (5)
A mixture 0.5 mmol (0.179 g) of 4-(1-pyrenylmethoxy)phtha-
lonitrile (2) and 0.125 mmol (0.016 g) of anhydrous NiCl2 with 2
drop DBU in 1.5 ml hexanol was heated and stirred at 160 ꢀC for 6 h
under N2 in a sealed tube. After cooling to room temperature, the
suspension was dissolved in 1 ml DMF and poured into 150 ml ice-
water mixture. After that, precipitated greeneblue solid was
filtered off. The precipitate was first refluxed in chloroform and
then washed subsequently with ethanol and acetone and then
dried in vacuo. Purification of the product was accomplished by
column chromatography on silica gel first with ethanol then with
2.2. Synthesis
2.2.1. 4-(1-pyrenylmethoxy)phthalonitrile (2)
THF as the eluent. Yield: 55 mg (29.6%); m.p. > 200 ꢀC. IR (cmꢁ1):
y
4-Nitrophthalonitrile (0.173 g, 1.0 mmol) and 1-pyrenylmethanol
(1) (0.232 g, 1.0 mmol) were added successively with stirring to dry
DMSO (10 ml). After they were dissolved, anhydrous K2CO3 (0.5 g,
3.5 mmol) was added portion wise over 2 h and the mixture was
stirred vigorously at room temperature for further 24 h. Then, the
reaction mass was poured into cold water (50 ml) and the precipitate
formed was filtered off, washed successively first with water, then
with cold hexane, and then with cold diethyl ether and dried in vacuo.
3032 (AreH), 2948 (alkyl eCH), 1219 (CeOeC); 1H NMR (d-DMSO):
8.09e7.63 (br, 48H, AreH), 5.85 (br s, 8H, OCH2); UVeVis lmax (nm)
(log ) in THF: 684 (5.15), 347 (5.32), 332 (5.14), 283 (5.13), 269
3
(4.94); Anal. calcd. for C100H56N8NiO4; C, 80.13; H, 3.78; N, 7.51;
found: C, 80.31; H, 3.62; N, 7.64%. MS: m/z 1493.28 [Mþ1]þ.
2.3. Fluorescence studies
Yield: 235 mg (65.6%); m.p. 194 ꢀC. IR,
y
(cmꢁ1): 3081e3043
Comparative method was used to determine the quantum yields
of the compounds (3 and 4) as described in [18]. In this method, the
quantum yield of a compound is determined by using a standard
which has similar fluorescence properties as the compound has.
Also at least 5 samples of the standard and the compound with
different concentrations must be prepared to be able to carry out
the relation between the absorbance and the fluorescence emis-
sion. All measurements of the standard and the compound must be
performed at the same environmental conditions with the same
instrumental settings.
(AreH), 2918 (alkyl-CH), 2229 (C^N), 1251 (CeOeC); 1H NMR
(d-DMSO):8.34e7.67 (br, 12H, AreH), 5.90 (br s, 8H, OCH2) UVeVis
lmax (nm) (log ) in THF: 345 (4.60), 329 (4.44), 275 (4.72), 266 (4.53);
3
Anal. calcd. for C25H14N2O; C, 83.78; H, 3.94; N, 7.82; found: C, 83.92;
H, 3.86; N, 7.65%; MS: m/z 358.22 [M]þ.
2.2.2. Tetra(1-pyrenylmethoxy)phthalocyanine (3)
A mixture 0.5 mmol (0.179 g) of 4-(1-pyrenylmethoxy)phtha-
lonitrile (2) and 1.0 mmol of lithium metal in 1.5 ml of pentanol was
heated and stirred at 142 ꢀC for 2 h under N2 in a sealed tube. The
resulting green suspension was cooled to ambient temperature.
After that, reaction mass was dissolved in 1 ml DMF and poured
into 100 ml ice-water mixture with the addition 4 ml conc HCl. In
this mixture Li2Pc formed was converted into H2Pc. The precipitate
formed was filtered off and the crude product was subsequently
treated with boiling acetone, ethanol, hexane and then dried in
vacuo. Purification of the product was accomplished by column
chromatography on silica gel first with ethanol then with THF as
The quantum yield of a compound according to comparative
method is given by Eq. (1):
slopeðAc ꢁ IcÞ n2c
FF;C
¼
FF;std
(1)
2
slopeðAstd ꢁ Istd
Þ
nstd
where FF,C and FF,std are the quantum yields of the compound
and the standard, nc and nstd are the refractive indices of the
solution of the compound and the standard, slope (Ac ꢁ Ic) and
slope (Astd ꢁ Istd) are the slopes of the graphs plotted between the
eluent. Yield: 46 mg (25.7%); m.p. > 200 ꢀC. IR
y
(cmꢁ1): 3264