670
M. Arıcı et al. / Electrochimica Acta 113 (2013) 668–678
will be used to decide possible technological applications of these
novel complexes especially in electrochromic applications.
2993, 2951, 2930 (aliphatic-CH), 1598, 1584, 1503 (C C), 754
(C–S–C), 1438, 1396, 1313, 1253, 1230, 1177, 1135, (C–O–C),
1023, 907, 877, 806 (Pc skeleton). Elemental analyses data for
C128H96N16O16S8Lu: Required: C, 60.39; H, 3.80; N, 8.80; S, 10.08%.
Found: C, 61.49; H, 3.71; N, 8.74; S, 10.28%. MS (ESI-MS) m/z:
Calc.:2545.7; Found: 2546.4 [M + H]+.
2. Synthesis
2.1. Materials
2.3.2. 2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-Octakis-[3,4-
4-(3,4-(Dimethoxyphenylthio)) phthalonitrile (1), 4,5-bis[3,4-
(dimethoxyphenylthio]phthalocyaninato lutetium(III) acetate
(6)
(dimethoxyphenylthio)]-phthalonitrile
(2)
and
3-(3,4-
(dimethoxyphenylthio)) phthalonitrile (3) was synthesized
according to procedures in the literatures [25–27]. N,Nꢀ-
dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO),
chloroform (CHCl3), tetrahydrofuran (THF), methanol (MetOH),
dichloromethane (DCM), 1-pentanol, and n-hexane were pur-
chased from Merck. 3-Nitrophthalonitrile, 4-nitrophthalonitrile,
The procedure for the synthesis of 6 was similar to that used
for 4, except compound 2 (0.32 g, 0.68 mmol) was used instead of
compound 1. The crude product was precipitated, collected by fil-
tration and washed with hot hexane. Compound 6 was purified
with column chromatography using a mixture of CHCl3:THF (3:1
by volume) and CHCl3:Methanol (1:1 by volume) as eluents. Com-
pound 6 was obtained as a major product. Yield = 46 mg (12.74%).
UV–vis in DCM (ꢁmax nm (log ε)): 358 (4.71), 639 (4.28), 708 (4.99).
IR spectrum (cm−1): 3055 (Ar-CH), 2951, 2931, 2833 (aliphatic-CH),
1583, 1501 (C C), 1462, 1400, 1369, 1322, 1252 (C–O–C), 1023, 940,
876, 805 (Pc skeleton), 767, 753 (C–S–C). Elemental analyses data
for C64H48N8O8S4Lu: Required: C, 61.93; H, 3.90; N, 9.03; S, 10.33%.
Found: 62.43; H, 4.00; N, 9.13; S, 10.20%. MS (ESI-MS) m/z: Calc.:
2092.2; Found: 2124.87 [M-Ac+ Cyano + 2H]+.
4,5-dichlorophthalonitrile,
3,4-dimethoxythiophenol,
tetra-
buthylammonium perchlorate (TBAP), 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]
undec-7-ene (DBU), potassium carbonate, and lutetium(III) acetate
were purchased from Aldrich. Column chromatography was
performed on silica gel 60 (0.04–0.063).
2.2. Equipment
Absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu 2001 UV spec-
trophotometer. FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer
Spectrum One Spectrometer using KBr. Mass spectra were acquired
in the linear modes with average of 50 shots on a Bruker Dal-
tonics Microflex mass spectrometer (Bremen, Germany) equipped
with a nitrogen UV-Laser operating at 337 nm. 2␣-Cyano-4-
hydroxycinnamic acid (20 mg/ml in THF) matrix for the complexes
was prepared. MALDI samples were prepared by mixing com-
pounds (2 mg/ml in THF) with the matrix solution (1:10, v/v) in
a 0.5 ml eppendorf micro tube. Finally 1 l of this mixture was
deposited on the sample plate, dried at room temperature and then
analyzed.1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian 500 MHz spec-
trometer in CDCl3 solutions. Elemental analyses were performed
using a Thermo flash EA 1112 Series. GC-MS spectra were acquired
on a Agilent Technologies including 6890 N network GC system and
5973 inert Mass selective detector.
2.3.3. 1(4),10(13),19(22),28(31)-Tetrakis-[3,4-
(dimethoxyphenylthio)]phthalocyaninato lutetium(III) acetate
(7)
The synthesis of 7 was as outlined for 4, except that compound
3 was used instead of the compound 1. The crude product was
precipitated, collected by filtration and washed with hot hexane.
Compound 7 was purified with the column chromatography using
a mixture of CHCl3:THF (3:1 by volume) and CHCl3:MetOH (1:1
by volume) as eluents. Yield = 130 mg (49.43%). UV–vis in DCM
(ꢁmax nm (log ε)): 336 (4.61), 641 (4.28), 714 (4.98). IR spectrum
(cm−1): 3064, 2999 (Ar-CH), 2956, 2931, 2906 (aliphatic-CH), 1727
(C O), 1584 (C C), 1462, 1438, 1313, 1252, 1230 (C–O–C), 1022,
893, 876, 854 (Pc skeleton), 799, 748 (C–S–C). Elemental analyses
data for C66H51N8O10S4Lu: Required: C, 55.85; H, 3.62; N, 7.89; S,
9.04%. Found: C, 56.35; H, 3.72; N, 7.96; S, 8.94% MS (ESI-MS) m/z:
Calc.: 1419.4; Found: 1549.1 [M-Ac + Cyano]+.
2.3. Synthesis
2.3.1. 2(3), 9(10), 16(17),
2.4. Electrochemical, in-situ spectroelectrochemical, and in-situ
electrocolorimetric measurements
23(24)-Tetrakis-[3,4-(dimethoxyphenylthio)]phthalocyaninato
lutetium(III) acetate (4) and bis-[27(24)-tetrakis-[3,4-(dimethoxy
phenylthio)]phthalocyaninato]lutetium(III) (5)
The electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical measurements
A mixture of compound 1 (0.20 g, 0.68 mmol), lutetium(III)
acetate (0.12 g, 0.34 mmol), and 2 ml of 1-pentanol were refluxed
for 20 h in the presence of 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0] undec-7-ene
(DBU)(0.120 ml, 0.8 mmol)undertheargonatmosphere. Aftercool-
ing to the room temperature, the crude product was precipitated
with n-hexane, collected by filtration, and then washed with hot
hexane. The crude product was further purified by chromatogra-
phy over a silica gel column using CHCl2, a mixture of CHCl3:THF
(3:1 by volume) and a mixture of CHCl3:THF:MetOH (3:1:10 by vol-
ume) as eluents, respectively. After the column chromatography,
two products were obtained. For 4, yield = 42 mg (15.97%). UV–vis
in DCM (ꢁmax nm (log ε)): 354 (4.64), 628 (4.33), 695 (5.05). IR spec-
trum (cm−1): 3055 (Ar-CH), 2992, 2929 (aliphatic-CH), 1728 (C O),
1597, 1583, 1500 (C C), 751 (C–S–C), 1436, 1392, 1319, 1250, 1229,
1176, 1134, 1072 (C–O–C), 1021, 907, 876, 804 (Pc skeleton). Ele-
mental analyses data for C66H51N8O10S4Lu: Required: C, 55.85; H,
3.62; N, 7.89; S, 9.04%. Found: C, 56.61; H, 3.70; N, 7.74; S, 9.11%.
MS (ESI-MS) m/z: Calc.: 1419.4; Found: 1549.2 [M-Ac+ Cyano]+.
For 5, yield = 26 mg (12%). UV–vis in DCM (ꢁmax nm (log ε)): 345
(4.91), 624 (4.40), 686 (4.98). IR spectrum (cm−1): 3055 (Ar-CH),
were carried out with a Gamry Reference 600 potentio-
stat/galvanostat utilizing a three-electrode cell configuration at
25 ◦C. For cyclic voltammetry (CV), and square wave voltammetry
(SWV) measurements, the working electrode was a Pt disc with
a surface area of 0.071 cm2. Surface of the working electrode
was polished with a diamond suspension before each run. A Pt
wire served as the counter electrode. Saturated calomel electrode
(SCE) was employed as the reference electrode and separated from
bulk of the solution by a double bridge. Ferrocene was used as
an internal reference. Tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP)
in dichloromethane (DCM) and/or dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was
employed as the supporting electrolyte at a concentration of
0.10 mol dm−3. High purity N2 was used to remove dissolved O2
for at least 15 min prior to each run and to maintain a nitrogen
blanket during the measurements. IR compensation was applied to
the CV and SWV scans to minimize the potential control error.
UV/Vis absorption spectra and chromaticity diagrams were
measured by an OceanOptics QE65000 diode array spectropho-
tometer. In-situ spectroelectrochemical measurements were car-
ried out by utilizing a three-electrode configuration of a thin-layer