P.L. Beaulieu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
3
H2N
N
OEt
I
H2N
N
OEt
a, b
H2N
N
Br
c
ref 6
4
98%, 73%
COOEt
60%
12
11
10
COOEt
H2N
OEt
OEt
H2N
N
OEt
H2N
OEt
ref 6
c
d
b
N
5
N
N+
O
13
73%
97%
I
COOEt
57%
COOEt
15
14
H2N
OEt
OH
OH
O2N
OEt
OH
H2N
OEt
Cl
e, f
ref 6
g, h
i, c, j
6
N
N
N
N
COOtBu
H2N
COOtBu
91%, 43%, 48%
19
73%, 85%
22% (2 steps)
18
16
17
N
OEt
H2N
N
OH
H2N
N
OEt
AcHN
Cl
Cl
COOEt
N
k, l
p
m
ref 6
N
7
N
N
N
N
n, o
57%
COOEt
95%, 51%
CHO
23
22
COOEt
21
91%, 79%, 90%
r, s, t
15%, 59% (2 steps)
COOtBu
20
H2N
OEt
Cl
OEt
OEt
q, p
ref 6
8
N
N
N
N
COOEt
N
25
26
52% (2 steps)
24
COOtBu
H2N
N
OEt
I
H2N
N
OEt
H2N
N
Cl
b, m
c
ref 6
9
N
N
63%, 50%
N
27
COOEt
68%
28
29
COOEt
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) KOtBu (2.4 equiv), EtOH, 130 °C (sealed bomb for 3 days or microwave for 30 min) (98%); (b) N-iodosuccinimide (1 equiv), DMF, 0 °C
then rt 4 h (73%); (c) acrylate (5 equiv), P(o-Tol)3 (0.2 equiv), Et3N (1.5 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (0.1 equiv), dry DMF, 100 °C, 18 h (60%); (d) tBuNH2 (9 equiv), DCM/a,a,a-
trifluorotoluene (1:1), TsCl (4 equiv in DCM added dropwise over 3 h), 0 °C then rt 4 h (73%); (e) Et2SO4, NaOH (1 equiv), 5 °C, 20 h; (f) HNO3/H2SO4, CHCl3, 10–15 °C; (g) PCl5/
POCl3, 100 °C, 3 h (73%); (h) SnCl2 (4 equiv), concd HCl 80 °C, 1 h (85%); (i) AcCl (1.5 equiv), Et3N (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt (91%); (j) 2 N NaOH, tBuOH, reflux, 36 h (48%); (k) Ac2O
(2 equiv), pyridine, rt, 1 h (95%); (l) POCl3 (4 equiv), 60 °C, 4 h (51%); (m) NaOEt (21% solution in EtOH, 4 equiv), EtOH, 40 °C, 14 h (91%); (n) LiAlH4 (2.4 M in THF, 1.8 equiv),
THF, 0 °C to rt overnight (79%); (o) MnO2 (10 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt, overnight (90%); (p) triethylphosphonoacetate (1.6 equiv)/NaH (1.5 equiv) in THF, 0 °C, 30 min, then add
aldehyde, 0 °C, 30 min (57%); (q) DIBAL, CH2Cl2, À78 °C, 2 h; (r) NaN3, DMF (15%); (s) PPh3, benzene, reflux, 6 days; (t) 10% AcOH, 70 °C, 5 h.
luciferase reporter GT1b replicon assay,13 potency of pyridine
(4–6), pyrimidine 7 and pyrazine 9 analogs remained within 2 to
3-fold of 2 but pyridazine analog 8 suffered a 25-fold loss in
potency (EC50 = 360 nM). This result is not consistent with the
measured lipophilicity of this analog whose measured LogD of
3.4 at pH 7.4 was comparable to others in this series. The lower
Caco-2 permeability value for 8 (1.6 Â 10À6 cm/s) could be an indi-
cation of the reduced ability of this derivative to cross cell mem-
branes. Comparable values were obtained for compounds 2 and 4
when tested in a replicon assay using RT-PCR for RNA quantifica-
tion. Thumb pocket 1 NS5B inhibitors are typically 2- to 3-fold less
potent in GT1a replicon assays, as previously reported for com-
pound 2.6 This was also observed in the case of aza-analogs. Both
pyridine 4 and pyrazine 9 retained potency comparable to 2 in
the GT1a assay (EC50 = 27, 34 nM, respectively, vs 29 nM), while
pyrimidine 7 was significantly less potent (EC50 = 89 nM) and
was eliminated from further consideration. None of the analogs
tested in the cell-based assays displayed appreciable cytotoxicity
Bioavailability of analogs 4–7 and 9 in rats was evaluated fol-
lowing oral administration either as single compounds (5 mg/kg)
or within a mixture of 4 compounds dosed at 4 mg/kg each.14
Plasma levels are reported in Table 1 (either as Cmax values for sin-
gle compound administration or at 1 and 2 h time points for com-
pound cassettes). Pyridine analog 4 displayed the best profile
overall, with potency, ADME and preliminary rat PK comparable
to 2, albeit with lower partitioning to the liver in this species
(liver/plasma ratio = 2 vs 5). Compound 4 was advanced into
cross-species PK profiling to provide human pharmacokinetic pre-
dictions and estimate the dose required to achieve a strong antivi-
ral response, based on its potency as well as in vitro hepatocyte
and in vivo liver partitioning as previously described.7 Overall,
compound 4 exhibited a similar PK profile to 2 in preclinical animal
species with low clearance and improved exposure and bioavail-
ability in rats and dogs (Table 2). However, the lower in vitro par-
titioning of 4 in human compared to rat hepatocytes (Kp = 3.5 vs
1.5) coupled with
a low in vivo liver/plasma ratio in rats
in the Huh-7 cell line (TC50 >10
opyridazine 29 (as the free carboxylic acid derivatives) were tested
in the Ames test (multi-strain and TA100 strain of Salmonella
typhimurium) at concentrations ranging from 315–5000 lg per
plate with and without S9 metabolic activation. Both fragments
l
M). Aminopyridine 12 and amin-
(Kp = 2.6 vs 5.5) resulted in lower predicted human plasma/liver
partitioning compared to 2 (human Kp = 0.9 vs 3.5).7 It is interest-
ing to note that 4 is significantly more lipophilic than other com-
pounds in this series (LogD >5.9), yet it retains a low Vss across
all species tested, in the range expected for highly protein bound
carboxylic acid derivatives. While compound 4 was also predicted
were found to be non-mutagenic, confirming in silico predictions.