palladium and the active species is a dissolved pal-
ladium-triphenylphosphane complex. There are also a
number of papers that report the use of Pd/C as a catalyst
in singular reactions, but they are usually limited to the
more reactive aryl iodides and 2-halopyridines.5,6
The potential advantages of the Pd/C catalyst system,
the ease of separation and facile recycling of the metal
and the low level (usually below 1 ppm) of metal
contamination3d in the product, suggest that an efficient
Sonogashira coupling protocol based on the use of the
Pd/C catalyst system and utilizing aromatic halides other
than iodides would be of major interest for both industrial
and academic applications.
Son oga sh ir a Cou p lin g of Ar yl Ha lid es
Ca ta lyzed by P a lla d iu m on Ch a r coa l
Zolta´n Nova´k,† Andra´s Szabo´,‡ J o´zsef Re´pa´si,‡ and
Andra´s Kotschy*,†
Department of General and Inorganic Chemistry,
Eo¨tvo¨s University, Pa´zma´ny Pe´ter s. 1/ A,
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary, and Ubichem Research, Plc.,
Pusztaszeri u. 59-67, H-1025 Budapest, Hungary
kotschy@para.chem.elte.hu
Received February 3, 2003
Of the factors governing the catalytic efficiency of the
Pd/C system in coupling reactions, the choice of solvent
was found to be crucial,3d,5e although its influence was
not examined in detail; therefore, our first reactions were
designed to study the effect of the solvent on the Pd/C-
catalyzed Sonogashira coupling. Electron-rich 4-bromo-
toluene (1) and the more reactive 3-bromopyridine (2)
were chosen as aryl halides,7 and the acetylene deriva-
tives included 3-butyne-1-ol (3a ), 1-hexyne (3b), and
2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol (3c). The solvents used ranged
from the apolar toluene through dioxane to water, and
our base of choice was diisopropylamine. The aryl halide,
1.2 equiv of the alkyne, 5 mol % Pd (10 wt % on charcoal),
10 mol % PPh3,8 10 mol % CuI, and 1.2 equiv of
diisopropylamine were heated in an 80 °C oil bath for 24
h, and the conversions were determined by GC analysis
(Table 1).
The results clearly demonstrate the expected reactivity
difference between 4-bromotoluene (1) and 3-bromo-
pyridine (2), where the latter reached high conversion
in most cases. The comparison of the results in the
bromotoluene (1) series, on the other hand, shows some
interesting trends. The polarity of the solvent seems to
play an important role in the process. Addition of 5%
water to dioxane led to a significant increase in the
conversion, while in the dimethyl acetamide (DMA)
series, the effect was similar but less marked. It is also
interesting to note that reasonable conversions were
achieved also in water, except for the apolar 1-hexyne,
where the limited solubility of the reagent might hinder
Abstr a ct: With the proper choice of solvent, palladium on
charcoal acts as an efficient catalyst in the Sonogashira
cross-coupling reaction of aryl bromides. The catalytically
active species in the process is probably palladium, which
leaches into the solution but returns onto the surface of the
charcoal at the end of the reaction.
The palladium-catalyzed coupling of terminal acet-
ylenes with aryl and vinyl halides (the Sonogashira
reaction) is one of the important and widely used carbon-
carbon bond-forming reactions in organic synthesis.1 The
reaction generally proceeds in the presence of a homo-
geneous palladium catalyst, which makes the recovery
of the metal tedious if not impossible and might result
in high palladium contamination of the product. A way
to overcome these difficulties would be the use of a
heterogeneous palladium catalyst such as a solid-sup-
ported metal. The most readily available form of sup-
ported catalyst is palladium on charcoal, which is widely
used in heterogeneous hydrogenation processes and also
has a growing importance in carbon-carbon bond-form-
ing reactions.2,3 To the best of our knowledge, there is
only one comprehensive publication on the use of pal-
ladium/charcoal in the Sonogashira coupling,4 where the
authors claim that Pd/C serves only as a source of soluble
* Fax: +36-1-209-0602.
† Eo¨tvo¨s University.
‡ Ubichem Research, Plc.
(1) (a) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett.
1975, 4467-4470. (b) Sonogashira, K. Comprehensive Organic Syn-
thesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991;
Vol. 3, Chapter 2.4, pp 521-549 and references therein. (c) Bumagin,
N. A.; Sukhomlinova, L. I.; Luzikova, E. V.; Tolstaya, T. P.; Beletskaya,
I. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 897-900. (d) Hundertmark, T.; Littke,
A. F.; Buchwald, S. L.; Fu, G. C. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1729-1731. (e)
Erdelyi, M., Gogoll, A. J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4165-4169.
(2) Heck reaction: (a) Mehnert, C. P.; Weaver, D. W.; Ying, J . Y. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12289-12296. (b) Khan, S. I.; Grinstaff,
M. W. J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1077-1078. (c) Whitcombe, N., J .; Hii,
K. K.; Gibson, S. E. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7449-7476. (d) Hagiwara,
H.; Shimizu, Y.; Hoshi, T.; Suzuki, T.; Ando, M.; Ohkubo, K.; Yokoya-
ma, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4349-4351. (e) Djakovitch, L.;
Koehler, K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5990-5999.
(5) Other examples of singular Pd/C-catalyzed Sonogashira reactions
based on ref 4 are: (a) Potts, K. T.; Horwitz, C. P.; Fessak, A.;
Keshavarz-K, M.; Nash, K. E.; Toscano, P. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 10444-10445. (b) Bleicher, L.; Cosford, N. D. P. Synlett 1995,
1115-1116. (c) Cosford, N. D. P. et al. J . Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3235-
3237. (d) Bleicher, L. S.; Cosford, N. D. P.; Herbaut, A.; McCallum, J .
S.; McDonald, I. A. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1109-1118. (e) Felpin,
F.-X.; Vo-Thanh, G.; Villie´ras, J .; Lebreton, J . Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2001, 12, 1121-1124. (f) Bates, R. W.; Boonsombat, J . J . Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 654-657. (g) Heidenreich, R. G.; Ko¨hler, K.;
Krauter, J . G. E.; Pietsch, J . Synlett 2002, 1118-1122. (h) Mori, Y.;
Seki, M. J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1571-1574.
(6) For a solvent-free Sonogashira reaction catalyzed by Pd on
alumina, see: Kabalka, G. W.; Wang, L.; Namboodiri, V.; Pagni, R.
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5151-5154.
(7) Reagents were selected to provide a representative example both
in terms of reactivity and utility. Although aromatic iodides react more
readily under the applied conditions, aryl bromides are available in
far greater numbers and their use is more economical.
(3) Pd on charcoal in the Suzuki reaction: (a) Marck, G.; Villiger,
A.; Buchecker, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 3277-3280. (b) Gala,
D.; Stamford, A.; J enkins, J .; Kugelman, M. Org. Process Res. Dev.
1997, 1, 163-164. (c) Ennis, D. S.; McManus, J .; Wood-Kaczmar, W.;
Richardson, J .; Smith, G. E.; Carstairs, A. Org. Process Res. Dev. 1999,
3, 248-252. (d) LeBlond, C. R.; Andrews, A. T.; Sun, Y.; Sowa, J . R.,
J r. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1555-1557. (e) Sakurai, H.; Tsukuda, T.; Hirao,
T. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2721-2722.
(8) Preliminary screening of common phosphorous-based ligands
showed that the catalytic system containing triphenylphosphine is not
inferior in terms of activity to phosphites, dppe, dppp, dppb, or dppf.
(4) De la Rosa, M. A.; Velarde, E.; Guzman, A. Synth. Commun.
1990, 20, 2059-2064.
10.1021/jo034149f CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/13/2003
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3327-3329
3327