a
a
Table 2 Hydrodehalogenation of 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene
Table 3 Hydrodehalogenation of polychlorinated biphenyls
b
c
Cat loading Conv.
(mol% Pd) (%)
Yield
(%)
TON
(per Cl)
Cat.
Entry Substrate
1
b
Conv. (%)
loading/
mol%
(Pd)
0.04
0.04
499
499
92
91
2 500
7 500
c
Entry Catalyst
Base
a
b
c
d
t
KO Bu — — — 100
d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
[Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IPr)]
[Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IPr)]
[Pd(m-Cl)Cl(SIPr)]
[Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IMes)]
2
2
1
1
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
2
3
t
KO Bu
—
1
4
95
KO Bu — — 26 64
t
2
2
3
t
KO Bu — 16 73 11
2
0.04
1
499
499
95
84
10 000
1 000
t
KO Bu — 62 34
[Pd(m-Cl)Cl(SIMes)]
2
4
4
3
t
[Pd(Z -cinnamyl)Cl(IPr)] 5 0.02
KO Bu — — 55 45
t
3
[Pd(Z -allyl)Cl(IPr)] 6
0.02
0.04
0.04
KO Bu
—
9 51 40
4
[Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IPr)]
[Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IPr)]
2
1
1
NaOMe 4 14 48 23
NaOH — — — 100
d
2
a
i
Reaction conditions: substrate (0.04–1 mmol), PrOH (2–3 mL),
b
NaOH (10% excess with respect to Cl), 24 h. Conversion to
a
i
Reaction conditions: 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene (0.5 mmol), PrOH
b
2 mL), base (2.2 mmol), 24 h. Conversion to hydrodehalogenation
(
products, based on 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene, determined by GC,
biphenyl, based on chlorinated substrate, determined by GC.
c
Isolated yield, minimum average of two reactions.
c
minimum average of two runs. Ratio of dichlorobenzene isomers:
d
ortho–meta–para = 1 : 0.1 : 0.3. TON per Cl = 10 000.
Application of the methodology to mono- and poly-
chlorinated biphenyl derivatives was successful, as all reactions
proceeded quantitatively. For mono-, tri- and tetra-chlorobiphenyl
substrates, very low catalyst loadings were used (0.04 mol%
Pd) to achieve complete conversion to biphenyl (Table 3,
entries 1–3). Remarkably, our system was able to fully
generality of the reaction, hydrodehalogenation of 1,2,4,5-
tetrachlorobenzene,
a more challenging polychlorinated
phenyl derivative, was studied (Table 2).
The reaction proceeded smoothly towards the formation of
t
benzene, when using KO Bu (10% excess with respect to Cl) as
the base, and 0.04 mol% Pd of catalyst 1, in isopropanol.
hydrodehalogenate decachlorobiphenyl (Table 3, entry 4).
8
In conclusion, the commercially available [Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IPr)]
(
Table 2, entry 1). The catalyst loading was further
decreased, and a satisfactory 95% conversion was obtained
Table 2, entry 2). These reaction conditions were used to
compare catalytic efficiency of congeners of complex 1, the
dimers [Pd(m-Cl)Cl(SIPr)] , 2, [Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IMes)] , 3 and
Pd(m-Cl)Cl(SIMes)] , 4 (Fig. 1). The nature of the NHC
ligand leads to drastic changes in catalyst performance, with
conversions to benzene ranging from to 95%, the
2
,
1, was shown to hydrodehalogenate polychlorinated phenyls
(
and PCBs under very mild reaction conditions, using inexpensive
reagents. While strong bases, strong reducing agents and harsh
reaction conditions are generally used for such transformations,
NaOH as base and isopropanol as reducing agent were found
sufficient in the present system. The methodology developed
offers a very powerful, low-cost and safe technology for the
destruction of PCBs, whose proliferation in the environment
continues to be a serious health issue. It also offers a system
capable of promoting the room temperature dechlorination of
chloroarenes at low Pd loading, a reaction of significant
2
2
[
2
4
IPr-bearing system being the most efficient (Table 2, entries 2–5).
Interestingly, the monomeric complexes bearing an IPr ligand
3
3
[
Pd(Z -cinnamyl)Cl(IPr)], 5, and [Pd(Z -allyl)Cl(IPr)], 6
(
Fig. 1), performed poorly compared to [Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IPr)] , 1
2
7
(
Table 2, entries 2, 6 and 7). A drawback of the system
9
interest in organic synthesis.
t
depicted so far is the cost of the base used (KO Bu). Screening
of alkoxide bases showed that while unsatisfactory results
were obtained with NaOMe (complete formation of benzene
was achieved only when using 150% excess with respect to Cl),
complete dehalogenation was achieved with the inexpensive
NaOH (Table 2, entries 8 and 9).
We thank the ICIQ Foundation and the University of
St Andrews for funding.
Notes and references
1
2
UNEP, UNEP 2007 Annual Report, 2008, 90.
P. G. Shields, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 2006, 15, 830.
Finally, the best system found ([Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IPr)]
–NaOH– PrOH) was applied to the dehalogenation of a
2
,
3 For a recent review, see: K. Furukawa and H. Fujihara, J. Biosci.
Bioeng., 2008, 105, 433.
i
1
4
For a review, see: F. Alonso, I. P. Beletskaya and M. Yus, Chem.
Rev., 2002, 102, 4009.
range of polychlorinated biphenyls (Table 3).
5
(a) M. S. Viciu, R. M. Kissling, E. D. Stevens and S. P. Nolan, Org.
Lett., 2002, 4, 2229; (b) O. Diebolt, P. Braunstein, S. P. Nolan and
C. S. J. Cazin, Chem. Commun., 2008, 3190; (c) C. E. Hartmann,
S. P. Nolan and C. S. J. Cazin, Organometallics, 2009, 28, 2915.
O. Navarro, N. Marion, Y. Oonishi, R. A. Kelly and S. P. Nolan,
J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 685.
N. Marion, O. Navarro, J. Mei, E. D. Stevens, N. M. Scott and
S. P. Nolan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 4101.
2
[Pd(m-Cl)Cl(IPr)] , 1, is commercially available in research and large
quantities from Aldrich, Strem and Umicore AG.
6
7
8
Fig. 1 Well-defined systems studied.
9 V. V. Grushin and H. Alper, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 1047.
Chem. Commun., 2009, 5752–5753 | 5753
This journal is ꢀc The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009