Bichromophoric EDA Systems
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 101, No. 1, 1997 35
band region, though no significant exciplex fluorescence was
observed, as mentioned above. However, it is not obvious why
1-anthryl fluorescence is more quenched than 9-anthryl in these
ethereal chain molecules at the present stage.
anthryl moiety does not seem so significant in the low
vibrational energy region of this compound. These spectral
features are almost similar to those of 9-An-DMA. In 1-An-
O(CH2)2-DMA, however, two isomeric forms are involved, as
mentioned in the last section. One of them exhibits rather
diffuse fluorescence excitation spectra and exciplex fluorescence
by the excited-state transformation of the intramolecularly
interacting state, which was ascribed to the van der Waals
interaction between two moieties. The vdW state may be
tentatively ascribed to the intramolecularly closed form. An-
other isomer shows no significant exciplex fluorescence in the
excess energy region of <1300 cm-1. In the higher vibronic
band regions, no significant difference between two isomeric
forms can be distinguished for the exciplex formation. Taking
account of the 14-15 ns of anthryl decay time of the origin
band in this isomer, there seems to be only small intramolecular
interaction between the two moieties, which may be a possible
open form.
Discussion
Hopkins et al.17 reported the rotational isomers of trans and
gauche conformations in jet-cooled propylbenzene. The rate
constant of the intramolecular vibrational energy redistribution
(IVR) was suggested to be much smaller in the gauche
conformer (g) than the trans one (t) in propylbenzene.18 At a
low He backing pressure of the supersonic expansion, the similar
gauche and trans conformers were reported in the trimethylene
bichromophoric compounds, 1-(1- and 9-anthryl)-3-phenylpro-
panes (1- and 9-An-Ph) and also in 1- and 9-An-DMA. The
gauche conformers of 1- and 9-An-DMA were reported to
exhibit no significant exciplex fluorescence. The fluorescence
decay times of the origin bands of the gauche conformer of
9-An-Ph and 9-An-DMA were approximately 9 ns, while those
of the trans were 19-20 ns. The smaller decay times of the
gauche were ascribed to a considerable fluorescence quenching
of the anthryl moiety in the origin band region. These features
of the gauche conformers in 1- and 9-An-DMA were ascribed
to the smaller IVR rate constant than those of the trans ones.
In the gauche form, the anthryl vibrational energy transfer to
the trimethylene leading to the favorable conformation in the
exciplex was suggested to be prevented. The smaller possibility
of IVR in this conformer of the trimethylene was reported to
be responsible for no significant exciplex formation in the
gauche conformer of 1- and 9-An-DMA in the previous
paper.10,16
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a Grant-
in-Aid on Priority-Area-Research “Photoreaction Dynamics”
(No. 06239103) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports,
and Culture of Japan. The authors are indebted to Dr. T.
Shinoda, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toyama Medical
and Pharmaceutical University, for his kind AM1 calculations
of geometrical optimization of molecules.
References and Notes
(1) Felker, P. M.; Syage, J. A.; Lambert, W. R.; Zewail, A. M. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1982, 92, 1.
(2) Syage, J. A.; Felker, P. M.; Zewail, A. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1984,
81, 2233.
In jet-cooled 1- and 9-An-CH2OCH2-DMA, anthryl fluores-
cence decay times of the origin band region are 7.4 and 9.6 ns,
respectively, as mentioned in the last section (Table 1). These
decay times are considerably shorter than those of 9-An-OCH2-
CH3 (16.4 ns) and 9-An-O(CH2)2-DMA (19.1 ns). The short
decay times of the anthryl in 1- and 9-An-CH2OCH2-DMA seem
to suggest a weak intramolecular interaction between an ethereal
oxygen atom of -CH2OCH2- and the anthryl moiety. It is
likely that the intramolecular interaction between the ethereal
oxygen and the anthryl moiety is attributable to a weak charge-
transfer character induced by the nonbonding electrons on the
oxygen atom to the anthryl in these compounds. This intramo-
lecular interaction leads to a rigid chain conformation of these
-CH2OCH2- bichromophoric compounds. Preliminary results
of AM-1 semiempirical calculations of the ethereal chain
conformation suggest that the rigid conformation is similar to
the gauche conformation of the trimethylene.19 By analogy to
the spectral and IVR features in the methylene gauche conformer
in 1- and 9-An-DMA, the smaller possibility of anthryl
vibrational energy transfer to the rigid ethereal chains, leading
to the favorable chain transformation for the exciplex, seems
to be responsible for no exciplex formation and small anthryl
decay times in 1- and 9-An-CH2OCH2-DMA (7.4 and 9.6 ns at
the origin), as mentioned above.
As mentioned in the last section, the exciplex fluorescence
decay time in 9-AnO(CH2)2-DMA was observed in the excess
vibrational energy of >400 cm-1. The anthryl decay time of
19.1 ns in the origin band region remarkably decreased with
increasing excess vibrational energy, whose decrement of the
decay times in the higher vibronic region may be attributable
to the increase of rate constants of the exciplex formation as
well as to the nonradiative process. Taking into account the
anthryl decay time of the origin region, the intramolecular
interaction between the oxygen atom of -O(CH2)2- and the
(3) (a) Wegewijs, G.; Hermant, R. M.; Verhoven, J. W.; Kunst, A. G.
M.; Rettschnick, R. P. H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987, 140, 567. (b) Shou, H.;
Alfano, J. C.; van Dantzig, N. A.; Levy, D. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95,
711. (c) van Dantzig, N. A.; Shou, H.; Alfano, J. C.; Yang, N. C.; Levy,
D. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 7068.
(4) (a) Saigusa, H.; Itoh, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 106, 391; J. Chem.
Phys. 1984, 81, 5682. (b) Saigusa, H.; Itoh, M.; Baba, H.; Hanazaki, I. J.
Chem. Phys. 1987, 86, 2529. (c) Itoh, M.; Morita, Y. J. Phys. Chem. 1988,
92, 5693, and references cited therein.
(5) Itoh, M.; Sasaki, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 6544.
(6) Castella, M.; Prochorow, M.; Tramer, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81,
2511.
(7) Castella, M.; Tramer, A.; Piuzzi, F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 129,
112.
(8) Anner, O.; Haas, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1416, and
references cited therein.
(9) Kizu, N.; Itoh, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 96, 5796.
(10) Kizu, N.; Itoh, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4799.
(11) (a) Kurono, M.; Takasu, R.; Itoh, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98,
5925. (b) Kurono, M.; Takasu, R.; Itoh, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 9668.
(12) Kurono, M.; Itoh, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17113.
(13) (a) Wang, Y. C.; Morawetz, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 3611.
(b) Mugnier, J.; Valeur, B.; Gratton, E. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 119, 217.
(14) Tanimoto, Y.; Kita, A.; Itoh, M.; Okazaki, M.; Nakagaki, R.;
Nagakura, S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 165, 184.
(15) (a) Tanimoto, Y.; Okada, N.; Takamatsu, S.; Itoh, M. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 1342. (b) Tanimoto, Y.; Nagano, M.; Fujiwara, Y.;
Kohtani, S.; Itoh, M. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1993, 74, 153.
(16) Takasu, R.; Kizu, N.; Itoh, M.; Shinoda, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1994,
101, 7364.
(17) (a) Hopkins, J. B.; Powers, D. E.; Mukamel, S.; Smalley, K. E. J.
Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 5049. (b) Hopkins, J. B.; Powers, D. E.; Mukamel,
S.; Smalley, R. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 77, 5049.
(18) Syage, J. A.; Felker, P. M.; Semmes, D. H.; Zewail, A. H. J. Chem.
Phys. 1985, 82, 2896.
(19) Private communication from Dr. H. Shinoda, Toyama Medical and
Pharmaceutical University, which will be submitted elsewhere. The AM-1
calculations were carried out by the same method as reported in ref 16.