1184
J Chem Crystallogr (2012) 42:1182–1189
Caution: Ethanethiol has a strongly disagreeable odor and
the reaction mixture became clear and was further stirred for
30 min at 10 °C. Formic acid (ca. 2 mL) was added to pH 4.2
with evolution of gas, and then 25 % TEAH was added with
care to pH 8.2. The solvent was removed under vacuum left
colorless oily liquid, to which anhydrous ethanol (300 mL)
was added to precipitate white solid. After filtration the
solid was washed by 95 % ethanol, dichloromethane and
ethyl ether to give white powders 6: 3.4 g (75.6 %), mp:
is toxic. Operations concerning ethanethiol must be carried
out in a well-ventilated hood and the released ethanethiol gas
should be absorbed by aqueous sodium hydroxide or potas-
sium permanganate.
Suitable crystals of 3a for the X-ray crystal structure
determination were grown from water by slow evaporation
of the solvent.
25
249–250 °C; ½aꢁD = 20.5° (c = 2, H2O); IR (KBr, cm-1):
Characterization for 3a: white solid, mp: 166–169 °C; IR
(KBr, cm-1): 3,239, 2,984, 1,645, 1,609, 1,556, 1,427, 1,402,
1,191; 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O, d ppm): 4.38–4.33 (m, 2H,
CH3CH2–), 3.62–3.58 (m, 2H, –NH–CH2–), 2.44–2.39 (m,
2H, –CH2CO–), 1.23–1.19 (m, 3H, CH3CH2–); ESI-HRMS:
[M ? H] 200.0341 for C6H10NNaO3S ? H (Calcd. 200.
0357).
3,241, 3,060, 2,623, 2,025, 1,645, 1,584; 1H NMR(500
MHz, D2O, d ppm): 2.56 (tt, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H, NH2–CH2–),
2.89 (s, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H, –CHH–CH–), 3.03 (s, J = 5.0 Hz,
1H, –CHH–CH–), 3.12 (tt, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, –CH2–CO), 4.37
(t, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H, –CH–COOH), 6.85 (s, 1H, –N–CH–NH–
), 7.61 (t, 1H, –NH–CH–CH2); ESI–MS (m/z, %): 225 ([M–
H]?,100), 216 (11), 182 (10), 114 (11).
Synthesis of 1,3-Thiazinane-2,6-Dione 5
The mixture 3a and 3b was dissolved in water (75 mL),
and washed with ethyl acetate (250 mL). The aqueous
layer was acidified by 6 N hydrochloric acid (ca. 100 mL)
to pH 2, and extracted by ethyl acetate (3 9 150 mL). The
organic ethyl acetate layer was washed by brine
(2 9 100 mL) and dried over anhydrous magnesium sul-
fate. After concentration, the residue was washed with
petroleum ether and yielded pale yellow solid of 4a and 4b,
which was used directly without further purification.
To a solution of prepared mixture of 4a and 4b (5.51 g,
ca. 30 mmoL) in ethyl acetate (25.5 mL) at 10–15 °C was
added dropwise a solution of phosphorus tribromide
(8.93 g, 33 mmol) in ethyl acetate (10 mL) in 20 min to
precipitate white solid. The mixture was further stirred
for 40 min at 25 °C, monitored by TLC (ethyl acetate:
n-hexane = 3:7). After completion, 5 % sodium bicar-
bonate (35 mL) was added, and extracted with ethyl ace-
tate (3 9 25 mL), washed by brine and dried over
anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Concentration of the solvent
left sticky residue (ca. 3.8 g), which was stirred with ethyl
acetate (2.5 mL) and cooled to precipitate white powders
5: 3.30 g (84.0 %), mp: 89–92 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1): 3,311,
3,212, 1,730, 1,636, 1,052, 1,032; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3, d ppm): 7.35 (br, 1H, NH), 3.60 (q, J = 5.0 Hz,
2H, –CH2–CO), 2.85 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H, –CH2–NH);
EI-MS (m/z, %): 131 (M?, 98), 103 (22), 98 (100).
Crystal Structure Determination and Refinement for 3a
A colorless tabular single crystal of 3a with approximate
dimensions of 0.30 9 0.25 9 0.25 mm was mounted on the
top of a glass fiber in a random orientation. The data col-
lection was performed on a Brucker SMART APEX CCD
area detector diffractometer equipped with a graphite-
˚
monochromatic MoKa (k = 0.71073 A) radiation using the
SMART program [6]. The collected data were reduced by
using the program SAINT and empirical absorption correc-
tion was made by using the SADABS program. Out of
the total 11,083 reflections collected in the range of 2.2° B
h B 25.5° (–12 B h B 11, -16 B k B 16, -19 B l B 14)
at 293 (2) K, 7,659 were independent with Rint = 0.022 and
5,528 were observed (I [ 2r(I)). The structure was solved
by direct methods and refined on F2 by full-matrix least-
squares techniques with SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 [7]. All
of the non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, and
the hydrogen atoms were located by geometry calculation
and riding on the related parent atoms and refined isotropi-
˚
cally. The C–H distances were within the range 0.96–0.97 A
and Uiso(H) values were set at 1.2 or 1.5 times Ueq(C). Other
H atoms were fixed geometrically and treated as riding on the
parent N or O atoms by a mixture of independent and con-
strained refinement. Atoms C22, C23, C32, C33 from the
ligand possessed relatively high parameters from thermal
motion. This situation itself was very characteristic for long
chain fragments, and was not possible to resolve this disor-
der. Thus, these atoms were refined with similar Uij (SIMU)
restraints for atomic thermal parameters and this afforded
well-refinable model. A full-matrix least-squares refinement
gave the final R = 0.081, wR = 0.172 (w = 1/[r2(Fo2) ?
(0.0736P)2 ? 0.5088P], where P = (Fo2 ? 2F2c)/3), S = 1.27,
Synthesis of L-Carnosine 6
To a solution of L-histidine (3.1 g, 20 mmol) in water
(30 mL) cooled to 10 °C was added 25 % aqueous tetraethyl
ammonium hydroxide (TEAH) adjusting the pH to 9.2. 1,3-
Thiazinane-2,6-dione 5 (3.9 g, 30 mmol) was added to the
mixture in portions in 30 min and maintaining the pH
between 8.2 and 9.2 by adding 25 % TEAH. After addition,
-3
.
˚
(D/r)max = 0.001, (Dq)max = 0.71 and (Dq)min = -0.80 eA
Crystallographic details for 3a are given in Table 1.
123