CN substituent,6 no information is in the public domain with
respect to the role of the subunits that adorn the terpenoid
core (the COOH group, the isopropyl substituent, the
cyclopentane ring).
Scheme 1. Preparation of the Requisite Cyclopentenones
A resurgence of interest in sordarins has occurred in the
past few years, as attested by recent synthetic activity7 that
nicely complements early work dating from 1993.8 The
chemistry developed during these important efforts could
surely be harnessed to furnish analogs that may clarify the
function of the various segments of the sordarin core. A more
practical alternative might be to focus on ketones 3, which,
arguably, could be expeditiously elaborated to sordarin
analogs displaying variously modified terpenoid units. A
concise avenue to 3 is presented herein, together with a
discussion of unusual chemical properties observed for
various synthetic intermediates.
10, reacted under identical conditions to give 12, via a
thermodynamic enolate. Michael reaction of ketoesters 11
and 12 with acrolein in the presence of 2 mol % of DBU
proceeded in quantitative yield (Scheme 2). Larger quantities
Our approach to 3 emphasizes low cost and ease of
execution, while regarding issues of absolute stereocontrol
as secondary, at least at this stage. The retrosynthetic
considerations adumbrated in Figure 2 identified enones 5
Scheme 2. Michael-Baylis-Hillman Avenue to Enones
14-16
Figure 2. Retrosynthetic analysis of ketones 3.
of DBU promoted incomplete conversion, seemingly due to
the acceleration of a competing retro-Michael expulsion of
acrolein from the products. Aldehydes 13 and 15 are sensitive
materials that degrade easily on silica gel. Fortunately, they
emerged in a state of high purity and were utilized in the
subsequent Baylis-Hillman14 step without purification. The
kinetics of the latter reaction are notoriously slow. In neat
acrylonitrile, 13 reacted at a reasonable rate, but 15 required
more than 4 days to advance to 16 (68% chromatographed).
The reasons behind the poor reactivity of 15 remain unclear.
A 9-fold rate acceleration was achieved under Aggarwal
conditions (La(OTf)3 and triethanolamine as cocatalysts),15
but to the slight detriment of yield (50% chromatographed).
In either case, the reaction furnished 14 and 16 as a mixture
of alcohol diastereomers. However, this was inconsequential,
because the alcohol in question is destined to undergo
and 6 as suitable starting points for our effort. The preparation
of these educts proceeded from 1,3-diones 7 and 8 (Scheme
1). Thus, 7 was converted into 9 with MeOH/TiCl4,9 while
10 was best prepared by O-methylation of 810 with Me2SO4/
K2CO3. Deprotonation of 2-unsubstituted enone 9 with
LHMDS produced a kinetic enolate, which reacted with the
Mander reagent11 to yield the known12 11 (Scheme 1). In
accord with Koreeda,13 however, the 2-substituted analog,
(4) (a) Capa, L.; Mendoza, A.; Lavandera, J. L.; Gomez de las Heras,
F.; Garcia-Bustos, J. F. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 2694.
(b) Shastry, M.; Nielsen, J.; Ku, T.; Hsu, M.-J.; Liberator, P.; Anderson,
J.; Schmatz, D.; Justice, M. C. Microbiology 2001, 147, 383.
(5) (a) Bueno, J. M.; Chicharro, J.; Fiandor, J. M.; Gomez de las Heras,
F.; Huss, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 1697. (b) Serrano-Wu, M.
H.; St. Laurent, D. R.; Carroll, T. M.; Dodier, M.; Gao, Q.; Gill; P.;
Quesnelle, C. A.; Marinier, A.; Mazzucco, C. E.; Regueiro-Ren, A.; Stickle,
T. M.; Wu, D.; Yang, H.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, M.; Zoeckler, M. E.; Vyas, D.
M.; Balasubramanian, B. N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1419 and
references cited therein.
(11) Crabtree, S. R.; Mander, L. N.; Sethi, S. P. Org. Synth. 1990, 70,
256.
(12) Compound 11 is known: (a) Irie, H.; Katakawa, J.; Tomita, M.;
Mizuno, Y. Chem. Lett. 1981, 637. (b) Boschelli, D.; Smith, A. B., III;
Stringer, O. D.; Jenkins, R. H., Jr.; Davis, F. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981,
22, 4385.
(13) (a) Koreeda, M.; Liang, Y.; Akagi, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1979, 449. (b) Koreeda, M.; Liang, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981,
22, 15.
(14) Reviews: (a) Ciganek, E. Org. React. 1997, 51, 201. (b) Basavaiah,
D.; Rao, A. J.; Satyanarayana, T. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 811. (c) Awad,
L.; Demange, R.; Zhu, Y.-H.; Vogel, P. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 1235.
(15) Aggarwal, V. K.; Mereu, A.; Tarver, G. J.; McCague, R. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 7183.
(6) Tse, B.; Balkovec, J. M.; Blazey, C. M.; Hsu, M.-J.; Nielsen, J.;
Schmatz, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2269.
(7) (a) Mander, L. N.; Thomson, R. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1321. (b)
Mander, L. N.; Thomson R. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1654. (c) Kitamura,
M.; Chiba, S.; Narasaka, K. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 942. (d) Chiba, S.;
Kitamura, M.; Narasaka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6931.
(8) Kato, N.; Kusakabe, S.; Wu, X.; Kamitamari, M.; Takeshita, H. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1002.
(9) Clerici, A.; Pastori, N.; Porta, O. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 217.
(10) Majetich, G.; Song, J.-S.; Ringold, C.; Nemeth, G. A.; Newton, M.
G. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 3973 and references cited therein.
4120
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 21, 2007