Organic Letters
Letter
exhibited poor efficiency in the previous report.7 After testing
various ligands, we found that the phosphine ligands and
nitrogen ligands could both promote this transformation using
1a as a substrate (Table 1, entries 1−5). The dinitrogen ligand,
3,4,7,8-tetra-Me-phen, stood out, providing the desired
product in 65% yield (Table 1, entry 5). Additionally, other
iron sources were evaluated as well, and FeI2 gave the best
result (Table 1, entries 5−7; for details, see the Supporting
Information). Interestingly, when the highly pure iron catalyst
was employed, a higher yield was obtained (Table 1, entry 8,
75% yield upon isolation). Control experiments revealed the
necessity for a iron catalyst and ligand. No silylated product
was observed in the absence of the iron catalyst, and only a
21% yield of 1 was afforded without the use of a ligand (Table
1, entries 9 and 10). To evaluate the trace-metal effect in this
transformation, some transition metals were tested. Copper,
palladium, and nickel sources could promote this reaction as
well, but lower yields were presented (Table 1, entries 11−13).
These results suggest that this reaction was catalyzed by the
iron catalyst not other transition metals.
With the optimized reaction conditions established, various
aryl chlorides were examined. As shown in Table 2, the
monoaryl chlorides and biphenyl chlorides could both undergo
this transformation smoothly, providing the corresponding
products in moderate to good yield. This reaction exhibited
good functional group tolerance. Functional groups, such as
BnO, hydroxyl, morpholinyl, amine, Boc, CF3, Bpin, and
alkenyl, could be well-tolerated (5, 8−14). Electron-rich
substrates reacted well, affording silylated products in
moderate to good yield (4−7, 11; 5−83%). Electron-deficient
aryl chloride 12a underwent this transformation smoothly, and
a moderate yield was obtained. The alkenyl group could not
always be tolerated in hydrosilylation reactions, but substrate
14a could react well and generated the desired product 14 in
76% yield. Importantly, substrate 24a with a bulky steric
hindrance could also undergo this transformation, affording the
silylated product 24 in 70% yield. The heteroaromatic
chlorides were also suitable for this catalytic system. The
Scheme 2. Iron-Catalyzed Silylation of Aryl Chlorides
with low efficiency, even in the presence of electron-rich
ligands.13 In 2015, He and coworkers reported the palladium-
catalyzed silylation of aryl halides, in which only one example
of aryl chloride, 4-chloroanisole, was studied using a reactive
silylborane reagent.14 Therefore, the development of an
efficient and economical method for the synthesis of aryl
silane is highly appealing. With our continuing interest in
transition-metal catalysis,15 we herein report the first example
of the iron-catalyzed silylation of aryl chlorides using a nitrogen
ligand.
With these considerations in mind, we began our initial
studies on the silylation of the relatively reactive 4-biphenyl
chloride 15a with silylborane reagent 2b.9a To our delight, the
corresponding silylated product 15 could be obtained in
moderate to excellent yield (90% yield upon isolation) when
this reaction proceeded in the presence of FeI2 and nitrogen
ligands or phosphine ligands. (For details, see the Supporting
Information.) Encouraged by these results, we started to
investigate the silylation of the more inert substrate, which
a
Table 1. Representative Results for the Optimization of the Iron-Catalyzed Silylation of Aryl Chloride 1a
b
entry
[Fe]
ligand
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
FeI2
FeI2
FeI2
FeI2
XantPhos (10 mol %)
XPhos (10 mol %)
PCy3 (20 mol %)
2,9-di-Me-phen (10 mol %)
3,4,7,8-tetra-Me-phen (10 mol %)
3,4,7,8-tetra-Me-phen (10 mol %)
3,4,7,8-tetra-Me-phen (10 mol %)
3,4,7,8-tetra-Me-phen (10 mol %)
20
28
38
35
65
FeI2
FeBr2
Fe(OAc)2
FeI2
43
33
c
8
c
77 (75)
21
9
FeI2
10
11
12
13
3,4,7,8-tetra-Me-phen (10 mol %)
3,4,7,8-tetra-Me-phen (10 mol %)
3,4,7,8-tetra-Me-phen (10 mol %)
3,4,7,8-tetra-Me-phen (10 mol %)
0
28
24
44
CuI (5 mol %)
PdI2 (0.1 mol %)
Ni(OAc)2·4H2O (0.1 mol %)
a
Reaction conditions (unless otherwise specified): 1a (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), silylborane 2b (0.7 mmol, 3.5 equiv), [Fe] (0.02 mmol, 0.1 equiv),
b
Ligand (0.1 to 0.2 equiv), t-BuONa (0.5 mmol, 2.5 equiv), THF (1.5 mL), 120 °C, 12 h. Determined by 1H NMR using mesitylene as an internal
standard. The isolated yield is shown in parentheses. FeI2(99.99%) was used.
c
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX