134
H. Molaei, H. Dehghani / Inorganica Chimica Acta 384 (2012) 133–136
meso
2.2.5. [H2t(4-Clp)p(NO)]BF4
β
Anal. Calc. for C44H26N5OBF4: C, 60.8; H, 3.0; N, 8.1. Found: C,
Ar
Ar
Ar
59.7; H, 2.7; N, 7.8%. UV–Vis (CHCl3): 448.8, 663.8. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d À2.84 (s, 2H, NH), d 8.53–8.55 (d, 8H, o), d 8.04–8.06
(d, 8H, m), d 8.78 (s, 8H, b). IR (KBr): mNH (ꢀ3320 cmÀ1). KM (in
α
N
3
2
acetonitrile) = 133.1
X .
À1 cm2 molÀ1
1
4
NH
HN
Ar =
X
2.3. Diprotonation of the meso-tetraarylporphyrins
N
To H2t4-(Xp)p solution (in chloroform) was added excess
hydrochloric acid. Evaporation of the solvent produced
diprotonated porphyrins as green solids that those molar conduc-
tivities in methanol solutions were: [H4t(4-OCH3p)p]Cl2
Ar
X=H, CH3, CH(CH3)2, OCH3, Cl
Fig. 1. Meso-tetraarylporphyrins, H2t(Xp)p.
(
KM = 165
molÀ1), [H4tpp]Cl2
KM = 199
À1 cm2 molÀ1), [H4t(4-CH(CH3)2p)p]Cl2
À1 cm2 molÀ1).
X
À1 cm2 molÀ1), [H4t(4-CH3p)p]Cl2
KM = 213
(
KM = 204
À1 cm2 molÀ1), [H2t(4-Clp)p]Cl2
KM = 179
X
À1 cm2
(
X
(
X
X
(
a Magna 550 Nicolet instrument was employed (using KBr pellets).
The molar conductance of the molecular complex (in acetonitrile)
and diprotonated species (in methanol) of the porphyrins was
measured on a METROHM 644 conductometer.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. UV–Vis spectra
2.2. General procedure
An evidence for formation of the molecular complexes of meso-
tetraarylporphrins and NOBF4 was UV–Vis spectral data. Porphy-
rins have an intense Soret band at 400–420 nm and there are 3–
4 Q-bands at 500–650 nm because of electron transition within
the porphyrin core. Upon the addition of NOBF4 to free base
[H2t(4-Xp)p], the UV–Vis spectrum of the porphyrins is red shifted,
Fig. 2. These red shifts provide evidence for the out of plane distor-
tion of the porphyrins core, which causes a strong interaction to
0.05 mmol NOBF4 dissolved in 10 ml acetonitrile and added to
0.05 mmol of meso-tetraarylporphyrins in 15 ml chloroform and
the mixture was stirred for 10 min. With slow evaporation of the
solvent at room temperature, afford the green molecular complex,
[H2t(P-Xp)p(NO)]BF4. The completion of the reaction was deter-
mined by the disappearance of the Soret band (ꢀ420 nm) of the
porphyrins in those UV–Vis spectra. The results of elemental anal-
yses for the molecular complexes which were dried under vacuum
oven for 12 h at 60 °C were consistent with 1:1 mol ratio, [H2t(4-
Xp)p(NO)]BF4. The synthesized molecular complexes are decom-
posed to the related porphyrins at 150 °C.
occur between the aryl rings and porphyrin p-system [2–10]. The
UV–Vis spectra for the titration of the NOBF4 into [H2t(4-CH3p)p]
(0.5:1, 0.75:1, 1:1, excess:1) showed a new absorption band at
448.3 nm, and shrinking of the 418.9 nm peak, which belong to
the 1:1 molecular complex and H2t(4-CH3p)p, respectively. The
spectrum of the 0.5:1 NOBF4-H2t(4-CH3p)p reaction mixture
clearly demonstrates the superimposition of the [H2t(4-CH3p)p]
and [H2t(4-CH3p)p(NO)]BF4 spectra. The employment of an excess
of NOBF4 beyond the 1:1 mole ratio led to no detectable changes in
the spectrum of the [H2t(4-CH3p)p(NO)]BF4 complex. Conse-
quently, The UV–Vis titration results showed that mole ratio of
porphyrin to nitrosonium ion was 1:1.
2.2.1. [H2tpp(NO)]BF4
Anal. Calc. for C44H30N5OBF4: C, 72.2; H, 4.4; N, 9.6. Found: C,
71.3; H, 4.0; N, 9.2%. UV–Vis (CHCl3): 445.5, 661.5. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d À2.80 (s, 2H, NH), d 8.64–8.65 (d, 8H, o), d 8.03–8.06
(t, 8H, m.p.), d 8.79 (s, 8H, b). IR (KBr): mNH (ꢀ3320 cmÀ1). KM (in
acetonitrile) = 134.3
X .
À1 cm2 molÀ1
3.2. 1H and 13C NMR spectra
2.2.2. [H2t(4-CH3p)p(NO)]BF4
The 1H NMR spectra of H2tpp and its molecular complex with
NOBF4 are shown in Fig. 3. When the amount of NOBF4 is less than
H2tpp, the spectra of the porphyrin and the related molecular com-
plex are superimposed. An excess amount of NOBF4 caused no
change in the spectum of the 1:1 molecular complex. As a result,
the molecular complex between H2tpp and NOBF4 had 1:1 ratio.
Anal. Calc. for C48H38N5OBF4: C, 73.2; H, 4.9; N, 8.9. Found: C,
72.1; H, 4.5; N, 8.6%. UV–Vis (CHCl3): 448.3, 669.4. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d À2.80 (s, 2H, NH), d 2.79 (s, 12H, CH3), d 8.49–8.50 (d,
8H, o), d 7.82–7.84 (d, 8H, m), d 8.72 (s, 8H, b). IR (KBr): mNH
(ꢀ3320 cmÀ1). KM (in acetonitrile) = 132.9
X .
À1 cm2 molÀ1
2.2.3. [H2t(4-CH(CH3)2p)p(NO)]BF4
Anal. Calc. for C56H54N5OBF4: C, 74.7; H, 6.1; N, 7.8. Found: C,
73.5; H, 5.8; N, 7.4%. UV–Vis (CHCl3): 446.8, 661.9. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d À2.90 (s, 2H, NH), d 1.59–1.61 (s, 12H, CH3), d 3.34–
3.38 (s, 4H, CH), d 8.54–8.56 (d, 8H, o), d 7.87–7.89 (d, 8H, m), d
8.73 (s, 8H, b). IR (KBr): mNH (ꢀ3320 cmÀ1). KM (in
acetonitrile) = 158.0
X .
À1 cm2 molÀ1
2.2.4. [H2t(4-OCH3p)p(NO)]BF4
Anal. Calc. for C48H38N5O5BF4: C, 67.7; H, 4.5; N, 8.2. Found: C,
66.5; H, 4.2; N, 8.0%. UV–Vis (CHCl3): 453.0, 686.8. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d À2.76 (s, 2H, NH), d 4.17 (s, 12H, OCH3), d 8.52–8.54
(d, 8H, o), d 7.54–7.56 (d, 8H, m), d 8.58 (s, 8H, b). IR (KBr): mNH
Fig. 2. UV–Vis spectra of (a) H2tpp (b) [H2tpp(NO)]BF4 molecular complex in
chloroform solution.
(ꢀ3320 cmÀ1). KM (in acetonitrile) = 149.7
X
À1 cm2 molÀ1
.