Mendeleev Commun., 2010, 20, 148–150
Table 1 CMC, z-potentials and micelle size (D) of compounds 1–3 in
1
1
1
60
50
40
7
6
5
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
water.
2
Com- CMC (tensiometry)/ CMC (conductometry)/
D/nm z/mV
7
6
5
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
pound mol dm–3
mol dm–3
1
130
120
1a
2
3
–4
–4
1×10
5×10
7×10
1×10
–4
–4
5×10
145
106
–55
–75.8
1
10
–5
–5
7×10
100
1
–
6
–5
–4
–3
a10% DMF, the system is unstable in time.
lg C
2
Micelle-forming properties of compound 1 and salts 2, 3 are
different (Figure 1, Table 1). CMC of compound 2 is higher,
while that of compound 3 is lower than that of compound 1.
Structural features, particularly the presence of rigid aromatic
3
–
6.0
–5.0
–4.0
–3.0
lg C
and heterocyclic fragments in sodium salt 2, result in CMC
Figure 1 Isotherm of surface tension of aqueous solutions of (1) oxaphos-
phorinine 1 and its derivatives (2) 2 and (3) 3 (25 °C). Inset: (1) isotherm of
surface tension of the aqueous solution of 3 and (2) change of particles
diameters depending on concentration of solutions of compound 3.
5×10–4 mol dm ) which is 4 times lower than CMC of the
–3
(
–
3
–3
anionic surfactant sodium deoxycholate (2×10 mol dm ), which
has also rigid fragment in its structure, and is significantly lower
than CMC of widely used sodium dodecylsulfate detergent
active particles and their z-potentials, obtained at the concen-
tration of 1×10–3 mol dm , are also given in Table 1.
Micelle formation in solution of acid 1 is stepwise, which is
indicative of structural changes in the system. As this system
is unstable in time, the study of its structural changes and
micelle sizes was impossible.
–3
–3
(
SDS, 8×10 mol dm ). Negative value of z-potential (–45 mV
–3
–4
to –68 mV) of micelles 2 in the area of concentrations 5×10 –
1
–2
–3
×10 mol dm (Figure 2) points out that compound 2 is
anionic micelle-forming surfactant.
For better understanding of micelle formation processes in
solutions of compound 2, it is important to observe concentra-
tion changes of D and z-potential of particles, especially in pre-
micellar area. As judged from surface tension isotherm appear-
ance, aggregation of molecules in the system is expected.
Figure 2 represents concentration dependences of surface tension
of solutions of 2, D and z-potential of particles formed. Comparison
of data obtained by different experimental methods evidence that in
Compound 2. Suspension of compound 1 (2.02 g, 0.005 mol) in
Na CO water solution of (0.21 g, 0.0025 mol, 15 ml) was heated until
2
3
full dissolution of the solids. After 3 h white precipitate of compound 2
was formed. The precipitate was filtered off, washed with water and dried
–1
in air. Yield 1.8 g (89%), mp 216–217 °C. IR (n/cm ): 421, 442, 465, 478,
4
8
1
95, 525, 540, 588, 632, 682, 724, 738, 756, 786, 818, 831, 852, 881,
96, 9, 1083, 1132, 1178, 1213, 1269, 1308, 1342, 1377, 1464, 1552,
603, 1643, 1754, 1890, 1909, 1959, 2168, 2283, 2672, 2726, 2958,
–
5
–4
–3
premicellar interval of concentrations 5×10 –3×10 mol dm
with maximum in the area of 1×10–4 mol dm , associates of
salt 2 are formed and rearranged in the solution; their size changes
from 100 to 200 nm depending on concentration of compound
2. Taking into account low concentrations of salt 2 and large sizes
of particles, it can be suggested that water structures similar to
the hydrated fullerene nanoparticles of 70 nm in size at con-
centration 1×10 mol dm participate in the particles forma-
tion. Similar results were obtained for analogous concentration
range of SDS solutions wherein a maximum light scattering
–3
1
3
2
3
3
JPC
072, 3364, 3576, 3610. C NMR ([ H ]DMSO) d: 123.71 [dm (d), C ,
6
1
4
4a 3
3
166.5], 142.84 [m (s), C ], 125.93 [m (d), C , J
PCCC4a
16.0 Hz],
5
1
3
6
124.96 [dd (s), C , J
HC5
162.7 Hz, J
166.2 Hz, J
7
5
6.1 Hz], 125.26 [m (s), C ],
HC CC
7
1
3
8
1
28.40 [dd (s), C , J
HC7
5
7
6.1 Hz], 121.19 [dd (d), C ,
HC CC
1
3
8a 2
J
J
HC8
162.3 Hz, J
POCC8
5.2 Hz], 155.18 [dddd (d), C , J
POC8a
7.0 Hz,
3
8a 7.3 Hz, 3
2
9
7
J
5
8a 7.3 Hz,
J 8a 3.6 Hz], 34.25 [tm (s), C ,
8
–4
–3
HC CC
PC CC
PC C
3J
15.8 Hz], 31.81 [m (s), C ], 29.4–29.6 [tm (s), C
10
11–16
], 29.17
PCCC9
4
1
7
18
19 1
[
2
tm (s), C ], 28.34 [tm (s), C ], 22.55 [tm (s), C , J 19 124.3 Hz,
JHCC19 3.5 Hz], 14.28 [qm (s), C , J
HC
5
20
1
1
2
HC20
124.0 Hz]. H NMR ([ H ]DMSO)
6.9 Hz), 1.2–1.5 (m, 20H, C
7.4 Hz), 5.97 (d, 1H, C H, J 15.5 Hz), 6.90 (d,
6
2
0
3
10–19
coefficient connected with the structural changes of the water
nearby aggregates or SDS molecules was detected.
d: 0.85 (t, 3H, C H , J
H ), 2.43
3
HCCH
2
9
3
3
2
(t, 2H, C H , J
2
HCCH
PCH
8
3
7
3
1H, C H, J
7
8
8.7 Hz), 7.16 (br. d, 1H, C H, J
8
7
8.7 Hz), 7.32
Concentration-dependent rearrangements of nanoassociates
of compound 2 are accompanied by changing of the z-potential
negative values. A nonlinear concentration dependence of size
and z-potential of nanoassociates in the solutions of compound
HC C H
5
HC C H
(
br. s, 1H, C H). Found (%): C, 58.12; H, 7.93; Cl, 8.54; P, 8.04. Calc.
for C H ClNaO P (%): C, 59.04; H, 7.18; Cl, 8.71; P, 7.61.
2
0
29
3
Compound 3. A mixture of compound 1 (2.19 g, 0.006 mol), dioxane
(10 ml) and triethylamine (1.26 ml, 0.012 mol) was refluxed for 15 min.
–5
–4
–3
2
in the region of 1×10 –3×10 mol dm looks like that of
The white solid of compound 3 was obtained after evaporation of volatiles
6
,7
size and z-potential of the nanoassociates detected in the
solutions of the ‘melaphen’ plant growth regulator and ichphan
C-10 functional cationic surfactant within the concentration range
from the reaction mixture in air. Yield 2.7 g (93%), mp 35–36 °C. IR
–1
(
n/cm ): 418, 449, 466, 514, 537, 573, 649, 667, 722, 755, 816, 836, 903,
9
1
1
1
76, 1039, 1081, 1133, 1179, 1216, 1342, 1378, 1399, 1467, 1553, 1601,
645, 2492, 2676, 2737, 2851, 2921, 3439. C NMR ([ H ]DMSO) d:
1
3
2
6
3
1
1
3
–20
21.56 [ddt (d), C , J
PC3
166.3 Hz, J
HC3
163.4 Hz, J
9
3
5.6 Hz],
HC CC
2
2
00
4
4a
3
3
70
60
50
40
30
44.44 [m (s), C ], 125.15 [dd (d), C , J
PCCC4a
15.8 Hz, J
8
4a 9.2 Hz],
HC CC
–
–
30
40
5
1
3
6
1
J
25.02 [dd (s), C , J 162.8 Hz, J
HC5
7
5
5.1 Hz], 125.82 [dm (s), C ,
HC CC
1
180
160
3
7
3
8
6
11.7 Hz], 128.87 [dd (s), C , J
HC7
167.3 Hz, J
5
7
5.1 Hz],
1
HC CC
HC CC
8
1
3
8a
1
J
21.16 [dd (d), C , J
HC8
163.8 Hz, J
POCC8
5.6 Hz], 152.22 [m (d), C ,
15.8 Hz, J 125.1 Hz], 31.81
PCCC9 HC9
2
9
3
1
POC8a
7.1 Hz], 34.06 [tm (s), C , J
–50
–60
–70
1
40
10
1
11–15 1
[
tm (s), C , J 124.1 Hz], 29.5–29.6 [tm (s), C
HC9
1
, J 125.6–126.0 Hz],
HC
17
6
1
1
2
2
1
8
9.34 [tm (s), C , J
8.07 [tm (s), C , J
HC16
126.7 Hz], 29.24 [tm (s), C , J
125.6 Hz], 22.58 [tm (s), C , J
HC17
125.6 Hz],
125.1 Hz],
3
120
100
18
1
19 1
HC18
HC19
20
1
1
4.25 [qm (s), C , J
HC20
124.6 Hz], 45.72 [t (s), NCH , J 140.4 Hz],
2 HC
1
1
2
.76 [q (s), Me, J 128.2 Hz]. H NMR ([ H ]DMSO) d: 0.82 (br. s, 3H,
HC
6
–
6
–5
–4
–3
–2
20
9–19
C H ), 1.12–1.45 (22H, C H ), 2.94 (br. s, 6H, NCH ), 3.67 (br. s, NH),
6
3
2
2
3
2
8
3
lg C
.00 (d, 1H, C H, J
16.1 Hz), 7.00 (br. d, 1H, C H, J
7
8
8.5 Hz),
PCH
HC C H
7
3
5
7.5 (br. d, 1H, C H, J
8
7
8.5 Hz), 7.37 (br. s, 1H, C H). Found (%): C,
Figure 2 Concentration dependences of (1) associates diameters, (2) sur-
face tension and (3) z-potential of nanoparticles in aqueous solution of
compound 2.
HC C H
6
3.54; H, 9.87; Cl, 7.06; P, 6.82. Calc. for C H ClNO P (%): C, 64.25;
26 45 3
H, 9.33; Cl, 7.29; P, 6.37.
–
149 –