The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
ARTICLE
parallel or perpendicular, would be expected to give a β value of
þ2 or -1, respectively. The anisotropy measured in the present
work is ∼0.0, which indicates an isotropic dissociation process.
This value of β does not give any indication of the nature of the
transition dipole moment in fumaryl chloride dissociation. Gen-
erally, an impulsive dissociation is accompanied with an aniso-
tropic distribution of the photoproducts, since the dissociation
lifetime is much shorter than the rotation period of the molecule.
However, the anisotropy in an impulsive dissociation can be
reduced,53,33 or wiped out,54 due to several factors, such as mixed
initial transition with both parallel and perpendicular compo-
nents, longer dissociation lifetime, dissociation not from a single
geometry rather from a range of geometries etc. In fumaryl
chloride, for C2h geometry, the π-π* transition, which has Bu
symmetry, the transition dipole moment is mainly along the x
axis and y axis. The same is true for the n-π* transition. So, in
this case even if there is a crossover from the initially prepared
π-π* state to the n-π* state, the transition dipole moment is
not changed. However, during this crossover period the molecule
may rotate. The absence of recoil anisotropy in the present
studies is expected mainly due to the mixed transition, as
discussed, and the relatively longer dissociation lifetime, since
the dissociation is not from the initially prepared state rather
from the crossover state. In addition, the different geometries of
fumaryl chloride also contribute to the β value of ∼0.0.
that in fumaryl chloride the initially prepared S2(1π-π*) state
crosses over to various states, namely, S1(1n-π*), (n-σ*), and
the ground state, and the Cl atom can be formed from all these
states, with different values of ET.
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*Electronic mail: haripu@barc.gov.in.
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Drs. S.K. Sarkar and T. Mukherjee for their constant
guidance and keen interest throughout this work. We also
acknowledge help rendered by Mr. Yogesh Indulkar during the
initial experiments.
’ REFERENCES
(1) Schippers, P. H.; Dekkers, H. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 145.
(2) Upadhyaya, H. P.; Kumar, A.; Naik, P. D. J. Chem. Phys. 2003,
118, 2590.
(3) Upadhyaya, H. P.; Kumar, A.; Naik, P. D.; Avinash, V. Sapre;
Mittal, J. P. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 10097.
(4) Kumar, A.; Upadhyaya, H. P.; Naik, P. D.; Maity, D. K.; Mittal,
J. P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 11847.
(5) Dhanya, S.; Maity, D. K.; Upadhyaya, H. P.; Kumar, A.; Naik,
P. D.; Saini, R. D. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 10093.
(6) Tang, X.; Ratliff, B. J.; Fitzpatrick, B. L.; Butler, L. J. J. Phys. Chem.
B 2008, 112, 16050.
V. CONCLUSION
In summary, fumaryl chloride generates a chlorine atom upon
excitation at 235 nm, which prepares the molecule initially in its
π-π* state. The nascent distribution of the photofragment
chlorine atom is measured by the 2 þ 1 REMPI with the TOF
mass spectrometry technique. We have determined the photo-
fragment speed distribution, the anisotropy parameter β, and the
spin-orbit branching ratio for the chlorine atom elimination
channels, to gain insight into the dynamics of the chlorine atom
formation. Polarization-dependent and state-specific TOF profiles
are deconvoluted to get translational energy distributions, using a
forward convolution method with least-squares fitting, taking into
account the fragment anisotropies. The TOF profiles for Cl and
Cl* are independent of the laser polarization; i.e., the parameter β
is well characterized by a value of 0.0, within the experimental
uncertainties. Two contributions, namely, the fast and the slow
components, are observed in the translational energy distribution,
P(ET), of Cl and Cl* atoms formation channels. The average
translational energies for the Cl and Cl* channels for the fast
component are 14.9 ( 1.6 and 16.8 ( 1.6 kcal/mol, respectively.
Similarly, for the slow component, the average translational
energies for the Cl and Cl* channels are 3.4 ( 0.8 and 3.1 ( 0.8
kcal/mol, respectively. The energy partitioning into the transla-
tional mode is interpreted with the help of an impulsive model for
the fast component, and a statistical model for the slow compo-
nent. While the experimental fT value for a slow chlorine atom is
nicely described with the statistical model, that for the fast Cl atom
channel is slightly higher than the predicted value of 0.32, by the
impulsive model. Apart from the chlorine atom elimination
channel, the molecular HCl elimination is also observed in the
photodissociation of fumaryl chloride. The observation of the HCl
molecular elimination channel in the dissociation process and the
bimodal translational energy distribution of the chlorine atom
clearly indicate the existence of a crossover mechanism from the
initially prepared state to the ground state. Finally, it is proposed
(7) Person, M. D.; Kash, P. W.; Butler, L. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97,
355.
(8) Wei, Z.-R.; Zhang, X.-P.; Lee, W.-B.; Zhang, B.; Lin, K.-C. J.
Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 014307.
(9) Szpunar, D. E.; Miller, J. L.; Butler, L. J.; Qi, F. J. Chem. Phys.
2004, 120, 4223.
(10) Wu, W.; Liu, K.; Yang, C.; Zhao, H.; Wang, H.; Yu, Y.; Su, H. J.
Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 13892.
(11) Cui, G.-L.; Li, Q.-S.; Zhang, F.; Fang, W.-H.; Yu, J.-G. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2006, 110, 11839.
(12) Ahmed, M.; Blunt, D.; Chen, D.; Suits, A. G. J. Chem. Phys.
1997, 106, 7617.
(13) Hemmi, N.; Suits, A. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 6633.
(14) Wu, C.-Y.; Lee, Y.-P.; Wang, N. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120,
6957.
(15) Katon, J. E.; W. R. Feairheller, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 47, 1248.
(16) Koster, D. F.; Vasiloff, T. P. Spectrochim. Acta 1971, 27, 1633.
(17) Pietri, N.; Jurca, B.; Monnier, M.; Hillebrand, M.; Aycard, J. P.
Spectrochim. Acta Part A 1999, 56, 157.
(18) Hagen, K. J. Mol. Struct. 1985, 128, 139.
(19) Landry, J. M.; Katon, J. E. Spectrochim. Acta 1984, 40A, 871.
(20) Bizzocchi, L.; Esposti, C. D.; Dore, L. Astron. Astrophys. 2008,
492, 875.
(21) Jabbari, E.; Gruetzmacher, J. A.; Lu, L.; Currier, B. L.; Yaszemski,
M. J. Development of a Novel Self-Crosslinkable poly(caprolactone
fumarate) as a Biodegradable and Injectable Scaffold for Bone Tissue
Engineering. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the
IEEE EMBS, Cancun, Mexico, 2003.
(22) Mahmoudi, M.; Simchi, A.; Imani, M.; Hafeli, U. O. J. Phys.
Chem. C 2009, 113, 8124.
(23) Maaref, S.; Roz, Z.; Sun, S.-S.; Seo, K.; Winston, K.; Bonner,
C. E. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 92, 317.
(24) Upadhyaya, H. P.; Saha, A.; Kumar, A.; Bandyopadhyay, T.;
Naik, P. D.; Bajaj, P. N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 5271.
(25) Wiley, W. C.; McLaren, I. H. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1955, 26, 1150.
(26) Lubman, D. M.; Jordan, R. M. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1985, 56, 373.
(27) Brophy, J. H.; Rettner, C. T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1979, 67, 351.
1545
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp1100279 |J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 1538–1546