Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2015, 91 1427
the addition of catalase with compound 10 had a minimal impact
on bactericidal activity. Significant suppression of bactericidal
activity was observed in the presence of the cell-permeating radi-
cal quencher NAC. Our results suggest that ROS such as hydro-
gen peroxide and bactericidal radicals (hydroxyl radicals, etc.)
are the primary mediators of the synergistic photobactericidal
activity observed with our combination procedure and that com-
pounds activated by UV-A irradiation induce the generation of
an excess of ROS in solution. A more direct assay of ROS gen-
eration (e.g. electron spin resonance analysis) would permit both
qualitative and quantitative analyses (19).
Considering the attenuation of killing efficacy observed with
NAC, unlike catalase, phototreatment with compound 10
resulted in the production of oxidative radicals in bacterial
cells. In the present work, we used flow cytometry to assess
the generation of ROS in bacterial cells after exposure to UV-
A in both the absence and presence of test compound (1, 4 or
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online
version of this article:
Figure S1. Scheme for the synthesis of trans-FA derivatives
4
and 10: (i) acetic anhydride, pyridine, 4°C to rt, 5 h, 93% (2);
ii) oxalyl dichloride, phenol crystal, TEA, DMF, DCM, rt, 2 h,
8% (3); (iii) 35% hydrazine hydrate, THF, rt, 30 min, quant.
4); (iv) acetic anhydride, pyridine, 4°C to rt, 4 h; (v) acetylated-
, tert-BuOH, DCC, DMAP, DCM, 4°C to rt, 18 h, 79% (6);
vi) 35% hydrazine hydrate, AN, rt, 30 min, 63% (7); (vii) 2,
WSCI, DMAP, AN, rt, 22 h, 65% (8); (viii) 10% TFA in DCM,
°C to rt, 11 h, 70% (9); (ix) 35% hydrazine hydrate, AN, 4°C
(
8
(
5
(
4
to rt, 50 min; (x) sat. NH Cl aq., 75% (10).
4
Figure S2. UV absorption (A) and fluorescence (B) spectra of
compounds 1 (solid line), 4 (dotted line) and 10 (dashed line) at
a concentration of 50 lM.
Data S1. Details of compound synthesis for O-Acetyl-(E)-fer-
ulic acid (2), Phenyl O-acetyl-(E)-ferulate (3), Phenyl-(E)-ferulate
1
0). A fluorescent probe that responds only to strong oxidative
species such as hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite was used in
these analyses. After combination treatment with compound 10
and UV-A irradiation, a 1.56-fold increase in the fluorescence
intensity demonstrated the generation of an excess of strong
oxidative species within the bacterial cells, which corresponded
to the strongest bactericidal activity observed in combination
photoinactivation experiments. In contrast, combined treatment
with UV-A irradiation and noncationic compounds (1 and 4)
resulted in minimal elevation in fluorescence intensity. Only a
small increase in fluorescence intensity (1.19-fold) was
observed upon treatment with compound 10 in the dark, sug-
gesting that electrostatic interaction with the cell surface does
induce some degree of change in the cell membrane. Treatment
with sublethal concentrations of a disinfectant possessing a
cationic property has also been shown to induce ROS genera-
tion in bacteria (24). Therefore, the mechanism of the bacterici-
dal effect of combined UV-A irradiation in the presence of
compound 10 may involve electrostatic interaction with the bac-
terial cell surface due to the positive charge of compound 10,
followed by in situ amplification of strong oxidative radical
generation induced by photoactivation of the compound by
UV-A light. The oxidative damage caused by the intracellular
ROS would then effectively kill the cell. We suggest that inter-
action with the bacterial surface is important for amplifying
intracellular ROS generation, because the nearly identical UV
and fluorescence spectra of compounds 4 and 10 suggest that
the degree of UV-A-mediated photoactivation is also nearly
identical.
(
4), O-Acetyl-N-a-Boc-L-tyrosine t-butyl ester (6), N-a-Boc-L-ty-
rosine t-butyl ester (7), O-(O-Acetyl-(E)-ferulate)-N-a-Boc-L-ty-
rosine t-butyl ester (8), O-(O-Acetyl-(E)-ferulate)-L-tyrosine
trifluoroacetic acid t-butyl ester (9) and O-((E)-Ferulate)-L-ty-
rosine hydrochloride t-butyl ester (10).
REFERENCES
1
2
3
. Maillard, M.-N. and C. Berset (1995) Evolution of antioxidant activ-
ity during kilning: role of insoluble bound phenolic acids of barley
and malt. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43, 1789–1793.
. Mattila, P. and J. Hellstrom (2007) Phenolic acids in potatoes, veg-
etables, and some of their products. J. Food Compost. Anal. 20,
€
1
52–160.
. Hartley, R. D. and E. C. Jones (1975) Effect of ultraviolet light
on substituted cinnamic acids and the estimation of their cis
and trans isomers by gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 107,
213–218.
4. Kort, R., H. Vonk, X. Xu, W. D. Hoff, W. Crielaard and K. J.
Hellingwerf (1996) Evidence for trans-cis isomerization of the p-
coumaric acid chromophore as the photochemical basis of the photo-
cycle of photoactive yellow protein. FEBS Lett. 382, 73–78.
5
. Graf, E. (1992) Antioxidant potential of ferulic acid. Free Radic.
Biol. Med. 13, 435–448.
6
. Ryan, W. L., D. J. Gordon and D. H. Levy (2002) Gas-phase photo-
chemistry of the photoactive yellow protein chromophore trans-p-
coumaric acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 6194–6201.
7
. Yin, R., T. Dai, P. Avci, A. E. S. Jorge, W. C. M. A. de Melo, D.
Vecchio, Y.-Y. Huang, A. Gupta and M. R. Hamblin (2013)
Light based anti-infectives: ultraviolet C irradiation, photodynamic
therapy, blue light, and beyond. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 13,
In conclusion, electrostatic interaction between compound 10
and the bacterial cell surface appears to play an important role in
the enhanced bactericidal activity observed in combined treat-
ment with compound 10 and UV-A irradiation. The electrostatic
interaction, mediated by the cationic L-Tyr HCl moiety in com-
pound 10, results in damage to the cell membrane and subse-
quent amplified generation of active radical species stronger than
hydrogen peroxide upon continued UV-A irradiation. The cis-
conversion induced by photoirradiation may also play a role in
damaging the cell by enhancing the reaction between ROS and
cell substrates.
7
31–762.
8
. Dovigo, L. N., A. C. Pavarina, A. P. D. Ribeiro, I. L. Brunetti, C.
A. de. S. Costa, D. P. Jacomassi, V. S. Bagnato and C. Kurachi
(2011) Investigation of the photodynamic effects of curcumin against
Candida albicans. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 895–903.
9
. Hegge, A. B., E. Bruzellb, S. Kristensena and H. H. Tønnesena
(
2012) Photoinactivation of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms and
suspensions by the hydrophobic photosensitizer curcumin-effect of
selected nanocarrier: studies on curcumin and curcuminoides XLVII.
Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 47, 65–74.
1
1
0. Chignell, C. F., P. Bilski, K. J. Reszka, A. G. Motten, R. H. Sik and
T. A. Dahl (1994) Spectral and photochemical properties of cur-
cumin. Photochem. Photobiol. 59, 295–302.
1. Hamamoto, A., M. Mori, A. Takahashi, M. Nakano, N. Wakikawa,
M. Akutagawa, T. Ikehara, Y. Nakaya and Y. Kinouchi (2007) New
water disinfection system using UVA light-emitting diodes. J. Appl.
Microbiol. 103, 2291–2298.
Acknowledgements—This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Young Scientists (B) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of
Science (25870476).