Published on Web 10/12/2007
Organized Surface Functional Groups: Cooperative Catalysis
via Thiol/Sulfonic Acid Pairing
Eric L. Margelefsky,† Ryan K. Zeidan,† Ve´ronique Dufaud,‡ and Mark E. Davis*,†
Contribution from the DiVision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena California 91125, and Laboratoire de Chimie, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure
de Lyon, 46 allee d’Italie, 69364 Lyon cedex 07, France
Received June 28, 2007; E-mail: mdavis@cheme.caltech.edu
Abstract: The synthesis and characterization of heterogeneous catalysts containing surfaces functionalized
with discrete pairs of sulfonic acid and thiol groups are reported. A catalyst having acid and thiol groups
separated by three carbon atoms is ca. 3 times more active than a material containing randomly distributed
acid and thiol groups in the condensation of acetone and phenol to bisphenol A and 14 times more active
in the condensation of cyclohexanone and phenol to bisphenol Z. Increasing the acid/thiol distance in the
paired materials decreases both the activity and selectivity. This work clearly reveals the importance of
nanoscale organization of two disparate functional groups on the surface of heterogeneous catalysts.
surface of a silica catalyst,11-15 but the arrangement of two
Introduction
different functional groups is more difficult. To our knowledge,
There is growing interest in developing multifunctional
catalyst systems where each different functional group plays a
distinctive role in the overall catalysis. Immobilization of two
or more functional groups on a solid support allows for the
possibility of spatial control of the different groups. They can
be isolated from each other, which can be useful for sequential
one-pot reactions,1-4 or they can be intimately mixed such that
direct interaction between the two groups is possible. In the
latter case, the two groups can act in concert to provide activity
greater than either could achieve alone (so-called cooperative
catalysis).5-10
there has been only one report of the organization of two
disparate functional groups into pairs on a rigid support. Bass
and Katz16 synthesized a precursor containing carbamate and
xanthate groups that was grafted onto silica and subsequently
thermolyzed to generate pairs of amine and thiol groups. No
catalytic results were reported from this bifunctional solid.
One reaction where cooperative, heterogeneous catalysis has
been well established is the synthesis of bisphenol A (BPA)
from acetone and phenol. This reaction is catalyzed by strong
acids and promoted by thiols that have been shown to increase
both the yield and selectivity of p,p′-bisphenol A over the
undesired o,p′-isomer (Scheme 1). Industrial processes typically
employ sulfonated polystyrene resins promoted by thiols, such
as cysteamine, bound to the resin by acid/base pairing.17,18 These
resins have a random arrangement of acid and thiol groups,
leading to a broad distribution of acid/thiol distances.
The mesoporous silica SBA-1519 is well suited as a support
for immobilizing organized functional groups. Its large, uniform
pore diameter (∼6 nm) provides ample room for reactant and
product diffusion, and its thick walls provide hydrothermal
stability. The rigidity of the silica matrix ensures that the bound
functional groups do not change their positioning (unlike
polymeric supports that have the potential to shrink and swell
When seeking cooperative behavior between the functional
groups, control of the distance between the reactive groups is
essential in order to optimize the catalysis for a particular
reaction. This is dramatically illustrated with enzymes that have
multiple catalytic functional groups organized within a single
active site. There have been several reports of the nanoscale
arrangement of two or more identical functional groups on the
† California Institute of Technology.
‡ Ecole Normale Supe´rieure de Lyon.
(1) Phan, N. T. S.; Gill, C. S.; Nguyen, J. V.; Zhang, Z. J.; Jones, C. W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2209-2212.
(2) Motokura, K.; Fujita, N.; Mori, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9674-9675.
(3) Helms, B.; Guillaudeu, S. J.; Xie, Y.; McMurdo, M.; Hawker, C. J.; Fre´chet,
J. M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6384-6387.
(4) Gelman, F.; Blum, J.; Avnir, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3647-
3649.
(11) Katz, A.; Davis, M. E. Nature 2000, 403, 286.
(12) Wulff, G.; Heide, B.; Helfmeier, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1089-
(5) Huh, S.; Chen, H. T.; Wiench, J. W.; Pruski, M.; Lin, V. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1826-1830.
1091.
(13) Tao, Y. T.; Ho, Y. H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 417-418.
(14) Dufaud, V.; Davis, M. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9403-9413.
(15) Mbaraka, I. K.; Shanks, B. H. J. Catal. 2006, 244, 78-85.
(16) Bass, J. D.; Katz, A. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1611-1620.
(17) McNutt, B. W.; Gammill, B. B. U.S. Patent 3,394,089, 1968.
(18) Wieland, S.; Panster, P. In Heterogeneous Catalysis And Fine Chemicals
IV; Blaser, H. U., Baiker, A., Prins, R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam; Studies
in Surface Science and Catalysis, Vol. 108, 1997; pp 67-74.
(19) Zhao, D. Y.; Huo, Q.; Feng, J.; Chmelka, B.; Melosh, N.; Fredrickson, G.;
Stucky, G. Science 1998, 279, 548-552.
(6) Zeidan, R. K.; Hwang, S. J.; Davis, M. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 6332-6335.
(7) Zeidan, R. K.; Davis, M. E. J. Catal. 2007, 247, 379-382.
(8) Miyabe, H.; Tuchida, S.; Yamauchi, M.; Takemoto, Y. Synthesis 2006,
3295-3300.
(9) Katz, A.; Bass, J. D.; Solovyov, A.; Pascall, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 3737-3747.
(10) Kwong, C. K. W.; Huang, R.; Zhang, M.; Shi, M.; Toy, P. H. Chem. Eur.
J. 2007, 13, 2369-2376.
9
10.1021/ja074761e CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2007, 129, 13691-13697
13691