It appears that the hydrophilic behaviour of the tertiary
amine in dabcoCH I?2CH OH and hydrophobic behaviour in
dabcoCH Br?2CH OH is due to a weaker affinity of the I
Acknowledgements
3
3
2
This study was supported by the Foundation for Polish
Science, TEAM project 2009-4/6. A. O. acknowledges the
receipt of a scholarship START from the Foundation for
Polish Science in 2012.
3
3
2
anions to the hydroxyl H-atoms of methanol than that of Br .
2
Hence, I binds to one methanol molecule and the other
+
…
methanol is OH N bonded to the dabcoCH cation. In
3
2
dabcoCH Br?2CH OH the Br anion attracts both the
3
3
methanol molecules in this way so that one methanol molecule
Notes and references
…
2
is directly OH Br bonded, and the other methanol is OH O
…
{ Crystal data for: dabcoCH
869507), monoclinic space group P2
3
Br?2CH
3
OH at 296 K/1.2 GPa (CCDC
…
˚
/m, a = 9.270(2) A, b = 6.7304(13) A, c
˚
23
bonded to the first mediating methanol. The CH OH
3
1
3
…
2
CH )OH Br aggregates engage all the hydroxyl H-donors
= 9.710(4) A, b = 107.60(4)u, V = 577.5(3) A , Z = 2, D = 1.560 g cm ,
˚
˚
(
3
2
GOF on F 1.167, R
.7 GPa (869508), monoclinic space group P2
6.653(3) A˚ , c = 9.643(9) A˚ , b = 107.72(7)u, V = 561.9(6) A˚ , Z = 2, D =
1
(all data) = 0.0984; dabcoCH
3 3
Br?2CH OH at 296 K/
and consequently no H-bond can be formed to the tertiary
+
amine of dabcoCH3 . Thus this final effect can be associated
˚
1
1
/m, a = 9.194(4) A, b =
3
2
3
2
1
.603
dabcoCH
P2 /m, a = 9.059(3) A, b = 6.7868(17) A, c = 10.543(4) A, b = 108.28(3)u, V
615.5(3) A , Z = 2, D = 1.717 g cm , GOF on F 1.178, R
0.0277; dabcoCH I?2CH OH at 296 K/1.2 GPa (869510), monoclinic space
group P2 /m, a = 9.040(3) A, b = 6.7590(9) A, c = 10.516(3) A, b =
08.45(3)u, V = 609.5(3) A , Z = 2, D = 1.734 g cm , GOF on F 1.676, R
all data) = 0.0486; dabcoCH I?2CH OH at 296 K/2.4 GPa (869511),
monoclinic space group P2 /m, a = 8.879(3) A˚ , b = 6.6161(9) A˚ , c =
g
cm
,
GOF on
F
1
1.137, R (all data) = 0.1801;
with the competition between the H-acceptors of the methanol
2
hydroxyl (this H-bonded to Br ) and amine N(4).
3
I?2CH
3
OH at 296 K/1.0 GPa (869509), monoclinic space group
˚
˚
23
˚
1
3
2
Our survey of the Cambridge Structural Database (version
˚
=
1
(all data) =
1
5
1
.14) revealed five crystal structures (refcodes: UNICIC,
3
3
˚
˚
˚
1
DAJVIV, VIBQUT, YASLOU, HUWLAN) containing the
2
Br anion and two methanol molecules hydrogen-bonded exactly
3
23
2
˚
1
1
(
3
3
as in dabcoCH Br?2CH OH (Scheme 1), whereas only one
3
3
1
3
23
˚
˚
1
0.328(3) A, b = 108.81(3)u, V = 574.3(2) A , Z = 2, D = 1.840 g cm ,
structure of an analogous aggregate involving the iodide anion
has been found (refcode WEPLEI). In this only aggregate of the
2
1
GOF on F 1.394, R (all data) = 0.0590.
2
I
2
anion, one methanol molecule forms bifurcated bonds to I
1
M. S. Kharash and F. R. Mayo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1933, 55,
468–2496.
2 S. W. Ciechanowski and R. H. Cole, J. Chem. Phys., 1973, 59,
and the second methanol molecule. We have also found 4 solvate
…
2
crystals where methanol is OH N bonded to an amine nitrogen
2
2
2420–2426.
in the presence of a Br anion, and 4 structures with I anions.
There are no isostructural relations between any of those
3
A. Budzianowski and A. Katrusiak, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110,
755–9758.
4 A. Olejniczak, A. Katrusiak and M. Szafra n´ ski, Cryst. Growth Des.,
010, 10, 3537–3546.
M. Szafranski and A. Katrusiak, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112,
779–6785.
9
structures, analogous to those between dabcoCH
and dabcoCH I?2CH OH.
The effect of hydrophobic and hydrophilic behaviour of the tertiary
amine in dabcoCH Br?2CH OH and dabcoCH I?2CH OH solvates
can be attributed to the balance between affinities of anions and the
3 3
Br?2CH OH
2
3
3
5
6
3
3
3
3
6 M. Szafranski, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113, 9479–9488.
7 W. Nowicki, A. Olejniczak, M. Andrzejewski and A. Katrusiak,
CrystEngComm., 2012, 14, DOI: 10.1039/C2CE25359C.
+
tertiary amine of dabcoCH
3
to hydroxyl H-atoms of methanol
8
9
A. Olejniczak and A. Katrusiak, CrystEngComm, 2010, 12, 2528–2532.
T. Talewaki, L. W. Beck and M. E. Davis, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater., 1999, 33, 197–207.
molecules, the only H-donors in these solvates. The hydrogen
bonding pattern can also be due to the difference in anionic radii
2
1.96 A for Br and 2.20 A for I , according to Goldschmidt).
2
10 Y. Cai, Y. Liu and G. Gao, Monatsh. Chem., 2007, 138, 1163–1166.
1 M. B. Smith and J. March, in March’s Advanced Chemistry. Reactions,
˚
˚
(
1
The resemblance of structures dabcoCH Br?2CH OH and
3
3
Mechanism, and Structure, 6th edn, Wiley, New Jersey, 2007, ch. 10.
12 L. Fabian and A. Kalman, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci., 2004,
3 3
dabcoCH I?2CH OH arises from the fact that the methanol
6
0, 547–558.
3 A. Bondi, J. Phys. Chem., 1964, 68, 441–451.
4 C. F. Macrae, I. J. Bruno, J. A. Chisholm, P. R. Edgington, P. McCabe,
molecule in reversed orientations occupies similar volume and
requires no symmetry changes. Hence, despite different
H-bonding patterns, similar anions, the same cations and
methanol molecules are similarly packed in the compressed
crystal space. Therefore the different H-bonding patterns can be
associated with the anions only, and not with the influence of
the crystal environment. On the other hand, the modified
H-bonding pattern considerably affects the crystal packing and
unit-cell dimensions. To our knowledge this is the first report on
1
1
E. Pidcock, L. Rodriguez-Monge, R. Taylor, J. van de Streek and P. A.
Wood, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2008, 41, 466–470.
5 F. R. Allen, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci., 2002, 58, 380–388.
1
1
1
6 L. Merrill and W. A. Bassett, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 1974, 45, 290–294.
7 (a) G. J. Piermarini, S. Block, J. D. Barnett and R.A. Forman, Appl.
Phys., 1975, 46, 2774–2778; (b) H. K Mao, J. Xu and P. M. Bell, J.
Geophys. Res., 1986, 91(B5), 4673–4676.
8 A. Budzianowski, A. Katrusiak, in High-pressure Crystallography, ed.
A. Katrusiak and P. McMillan, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2004, pp. 101–112.
19 Oxford Diffraction CryAlisCCD, Data collection GUI for CCD and
CrysAlisRED, CCD data reduction GUI versions and 1.17.13 beta,
Oxford Diffraction, Poland, 2003.
1
2
2
a remote Br and I anion exchange effect switching the
H-bonding pattern involving a tertiary amine. It shows that the
hydrophilicity effect of ions can be considerably longer in range
than is currently believed, and that the ions do not have to be
directly involved in the hydrogen bonds that they modify.
2
2
0 A. Katrusiak, Z. Kristallogr., 2004, 219, 461–467.
1 G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr., 2008,
64, 112–122.
6
376 | CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 6374–6376
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012