1372
J. Kim, S.L. Gipson / Polyhedron 23 (2004) 1371–1374
electron reductive elimination product ethane [13].
Oxidation of CpꢁRuL2R (L ¼ PMe3, PMe2Ph, R ¼ Me;
L ¼ PMe3, R ¼ CH2CMe3) and CpRu(PPh3)2Me yield
RH via Ru–C bond cleavage followed by H-atom ab-
straction from one of the other ligands [14]. In a similar
study of the oxidations of CpRu(CO)(PR3)Me (R ¼ Cy,
Ph), it was concluded that coordination of solvent to the
17eꢀ cation precedes Ru–Me bond cleavage [15]. The
only reported example of one-electron reductive elimi-
nation from group 6 compounds is that of Cp2MX2
(M ¼ Mo, W; X ¼ halide, thiolate) [16]. We report here
the first oxidatively induced metal–carbon bond cleav-
age (one-electron reductive elimination) in a molybde-
num complex, [Mo(C6F5)(CO)5]ꢀ, which also has the
distinction of not having any hydrogen-containing
ligands.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Cyclic voltammetry of PPN[Mo(C6F5)(CO)5]
The cyclic voltammetry of PPN[Mo(C6F5)(CO)5] in
CH2Cl2 displays a partially chemically reversible one-
electron oxidation at +0.66 V vs. Cpꢁ2Feþ/Cp2ꢁFe. The
ratio of the cathodic to the anodic peak currents for this
couple ranges from near zero at scan rates below 20 mV/
s to near unity at scan rates above 5 V/s. This change in
chemical reversibility suggests that the presumed prod-
uct of the oxidation, the neutral 17-electron complex
Mo(C6F5)(CO)5, undergoes a relatively slow chemical
reaction. In THF and MeCN solvents the chemical re-
versibility is even lower, with the peak current ratio for a
given scan rate decreasing in the order CH2Cl2 >
THF > MeCN. Given that this is the same order as the
coordinating ability of the solvents, these results suggest
that the decomposition of the 17-electron species in-
volves nucleophilic attack by solvent.
2. Experimental
The participation of nucleophiles in the chemical re-
action following oxidation of [Mo(C6F5)(CO)5]ꢀ is
further supported by the observation that the addition
of ligands such as pyridine and triphenylphosphine to
CH2Cl2 solutions of PPN[Mo(C6F5)(CO)5] causes a
decrease in chemical reversibility of the oxidation. At a
scan rate of 0.2 V/s, the peak current ratio for a 1.0 mM
solution of PPN[Mo(C6F5)(CO)5] in CH2Cl2 decreases
from 0.72 in the absence of pyridine to essentially zero
with 5.0 mM added pyridine. All of these observations
are consistent with an EC mechanism for the oxidation
of [Mo(C6F5)(CO)5]ꢀ.
2.1. Reagents
All reactions were carried out under argon using
Schlenk techniques or in a nitrogen-atmosphere glove-
box. All solvents were distilled from appropriate drying
agents and stored under nitrogen. The compounds
PPN[Mo(C6F5)(CO)5] [5] (PPN ¼ bis(triphenylphos-
phoranylidene)ammonium) and Cp2FeBF4 [17] were
prepared by published methods. All other reagents were
obtained commercially and were used as received.
2.2. Instrumentation
3.2. Chemical oxidation of PPN[Mo(C6F5)(CO)5] by
ferrocenium and tropylium
IR spectra were obtained using a Mattson Instru-
ments Genesis II FTIR and a cell with CaF2 windows
1
separated by a 0.1 mm spacer. H, 31P, and 19F NMR
In order to identify the products of the reaction of
Mo(C6F5)(CO)5 with nucleophiles, PPN[Mo(C6F5)-
(CO)5] was treated with the mild oxidants Cp2FeBF4
and C7H7BF4. The oxidations with ferrocenium (1
equiv.) were conducted in the presence of pyridine or
triphenylphosphine (2 equiv.) in CDCl3 as solvent.
NMR spectroscopy of the resulting solutions identified
spectra were obtained on a Bruker DPX 300 MHz
NMR spectrometer. NMR chemical shifts were refer-
1
enced to residual protons in the solvent (for H), 85%
H3PO4 external standard (for 31P), or CFCl3 external
standard (for 19F). Mass spectra were obtained on a VG/
Fisons Prospec 3000 double focusing spectrometer using
EI ionization. Peaks in the mass spectrum were refer-
enced to perfluorokerosene.
1
the products as Mo(CO)5L (by H and 31P, L ¼ Py or
PPh3), C6F5H (by 1H and 19F), and Cp2Fe (by 1H).
Thus, the 16-electron Mo(CO)5 fragment produced by
the Mo–C6F5 bond cleavage was trapped as a stable 18-
electron complex by the added ligand, while the C6F5
radical most likely abstracted a hydrogen atom from
adventitious water to yield the pentafluorobenzene.
The reaction of PPN[Mo(C6F5)(CO)5] with C7H7BF4
could not be performed in the presence of nucleophiles
since the tropylium reacted more rapidly with the nu-
cleophiles than with the Mo complex. Nevertheless, a
slow reaction between PPN[Mo(C6F5)(CO)5] and
C7H7BF4 did occur in the absence of added nucleophile
Cyclic voltammetry was performed using a Bioana-
lytical Systems BAS 100B/W electrochemical analyzer.
Solutions contained approximately 0.1 M [Bu4N]PF6
supporting electrolyte. Electrodes consisted of a 0.5 mm
Pt disk working electrode, Pt wire auxiliary electrode,
and Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Potentials were refer-
enced to the formal potential of the decamethylferr-
ocenium–decamethylferrocene couple (Cpꢁ2Feþ/Cp2ꢁFe),
which we measure as approximately )0.1 V vs. Ag/
AgCl. Simulations of the cyclic voltammetry were run
using Bioanalytical Systems DigiSim 3.0 software.