stereochemical control in macrocyclic formation can be
achieved by specific catalyst selection and that this meth-
odology can be effectively employed for the synthesis of
patulolide A and patulolide B.
cause predominant formation of the Z-isomer, presumably
due to steric effects during dinitrogen loss from the coupled
6
intermediate.
The bisdiazoacetate of hexaethylene glycol (1) was
prepared from hexaethylene glycol by conventional methods
in 58% overall yield. Addition of this diazo ester to a
refluxing dichloromethane solution of catalyst produced
macrocycle 2 (eq 1) in amounts and stereochemistry that
Treatment of a 25:75 mixture of 2Z:2E with 2,3-dimethyl-
1
,3-butadiene (10 molar equiv) in carbon tetrachloride at
reflux gave, after 48 h, complete consumption of 2E without
any observable reaction of 2Z (eq 2). This outcome was
were dependent on the catalyst employed (Table 1). The
major competing process was intermolecular oligomerization;
intramolecular insertion into an ether oxygen-activated
carbon-hydrogen bond, a highly favorable process with
dirhodium(II) catalysis,13 was not visibly productive. What
is perhaps most surprising about the data in Table 1 is the
surprising since relative reactivities of geometrical isomers
were not anticipated to differ to such a level in Diels-Alder
chemistry. For comparison, we reacted a mixture of dimethyl
maleate and fumarate under the same conditions and found
that the fumarate ester was also at least 50 times more
reactive than the maleate ester toward 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-
butadiene. The overall outcome is an effective kinetic isomer
differentiation, with the trans isomer reacting first followed
by a very slow cycloaddition of the cis dienophile. The
implications of these constructions for the design and
applications of crown ethers are under investigation.
Table 1. Catalyst Dependence for Yield and Z/E Ratio of 2a
catalyst
yield, %b
2Z:2E
Cu(MeCN)4PF6
Cu(PhCOCHCOCH3)2
Rh2(OAc)4
73
40
43
35
62
75
18:82
32:68
39:61
46:54
73:27
74:26
Rh2(pfb)4c
Rh2(4S-MEAZ)4
Rh2(5R-MEPY)4
A broad selection of bisdiazoacetates, including those from
diethylene glycol and tetraethylene glycol, have been treated
with dirhodium(II) catalysts, and the coupling products are
the only ones observed (from 96:4 to 88:12 Z:E ratios). Other
systems capable of addition, insertion, or ylide reactions,
namely bidsiazoacetates from cis-2-butene-1,4-diol, isoman-
nide, and 1,4-butanediol, give coupling product (Z only)
exclusively. Thus, as previously suggested by data from
a
Reaction performed in refluxing dichloromethane; diazo ester was added
b
to the catalyst (1.0 mol %) solution via a syringe pump. Yield (unopti-
mized) of 2 after chromatography on silica gel. Rhodium(II) perfluorobu-
c
tyrate.
extent of stereocontrol that could be achieved. With Cu-
8
(MeCN)
4
PF
6
as the catalyst, 2 was obtained with a greater
McKervey for bisdiazoketones, this coupling reaction is
than 4:1 E:Z ratio. The use of rhodium acetate changes this
stereoisomer ratio but not enough to be synthetically relevant.
general for the formation of medium rings to macrocycles
and occurs exclusively even when alternative addition,
insertion, or ylide transformations might also be favorable.
2
In contrast, chiral dirhodium(II) carboxamidates, either Rh -
14
15
(
4 2 4
4S-MEAZ) (3) or, preferably, Rh (5R-MEPY) (4),
Patulolides A and B (6 and 7) are macrocyclic lactones
that, since their isolation from Penicillium urticae mutant
(
12) Recent reviews: (a) Roxburgh, C. J. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 9767.
b) Stach, H.; Hesse, M. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 1573. (c) Tius, M. A. Chem.
ReV. 1988, 88, 719. (d) Paterson, I.; Mansuri, M. M. Tetrahedron 1985,
1, 3569.
16
S11R59, have been shown to have antifungal, antibacterial,
(
1
6,17
and antiinflammatory activities.
Multistep syntheses of
4
(
(
(
13) Wang, P.; Adams, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3296.
14) Doyle, M. P.; Davies, S. B.; Hu, W. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1145.
15) (a) Doyle, M. P.; Winchester, W. R.; Hoorn, J. A. A.; Lynch, V.;
(17) Makita, A.; Yamada, Y.; Okada, H. J. Antibiot. 1986, 39, 1259.
(18) Kalita, D.; Khan, A. T.; Barua, N. C.; Bez, G. Tetrahedron 1999,
55, 5177.
(19) Bestmann, H. J.; Kellermann, W.; Pecher, B. Synthesis 1993, 149.
(20) Solladi e´ , G.; Gerber, C. Synlett 1992, 449.
Simonsen, S. H.; Ghosh, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9968. (b) Doyle,
M. P.; Winchester, W. R.; Protopopova, M. N.; Kazala, A. P.; Westrum,
L. J. Org. Synth. 1996, 73, 13.
(
16) (a) Sekiguchi, J.; Kuruda, H.; Yamada, Y.; Okada, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1985, 26, 2341. (b) Rodphya, D.; Sekiguchi, J.; Yamada, Y. J. Antibiot.
986, 39, 629.
(21) Mori, K.; Sakai, T. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1988, 13.
(22) Corey, E. J.; Myers, A. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 3559.
(23) Ye, T.; McKervey, M. A. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 8007.
1
1778
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 12, 2000