3130 Anukumari et al.
Asian J. Chem.
O
OH
O
OH
N
O
Cl
O
O
O
c
a
b
N
NH
2
2
3
4
1
d
Cl
HN
N
O
Cl
O
NH
e
N
6
5
Scheme-1: (a) Ethyl acetoacetate, ethanol, heat, 90 °C, 4 h (b) dowtherm oil, 250 °C, 0.5 h (c) SO2Cl2, CHCl3, 6 h, r.t., (d) POCl3, 100 °C, 1h, (e) OPDA,
DMF, 90 °C, Pd(PPh3)4, 4 h
phosphorus oxychloride (4.5 mmol, 10 mL) was heated on a
hot water bath at 100 °C for 1 h. The reaction was monitored
by TLC. After the completion of reaction, the mixture was
cooled to room temperature and diluted with ice-cold water
(20 mL). It was then neutralised with sodium bicarbonate (5 %,
50 mL). The separated solid was filtered, washed with water
(2 × 20 mL) and dried to obtain compound 5. Yield = 3 g
(70 %), m.p. 91-93 °C. For spectral data.
Preparation of 2-methoxy-6-methyl-7,7a,11a,12-tetra-
hydroquinolino[3,4-]quinoxaline (6a): A mixture of com-
pound 5 (0.61 g, 0.25 mmol ), o-phenylenediamine (0.27 g,
0.25 mmol), triphenylphosphine palladium (0.1 g) and DMF
(25 mL) was heated for 4 h on a hot water bath at 100 °C. The
reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with
water (15 mL) and filtered to remove triphenylphosphine
palladium. The filtrate was washed with distilled water (2 ×
20 mL), organic layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30
mL) and the organic layer evaporated under reduced pressure
to obtain a crude residue. The latter was recrystallised from
ethanol to obtain compound 6. Yield = 0.3 g (49 %), m.p.:
142-143 °C. For spectral data.
spectrum showed signals at δ 2.62 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.83 (s, 3H,
OCH3), 7.56-8.01 (m, 3H, aromatic). Its LC/MS (ESI- MS)
showed m/z = 243 (M+ + 2) and 245 (M+ + 4) as twin peaks
corresponding to a molecular mass of 241. Compound 5 on
treatment with o-phenylenediamine in the presence of
Pd(PPh3)4 catalyst in DMF on a hot water bath at 100 °C for
4 h gave 2-methoxy-6-methyl-7,7a,11a,12-tetrahydroquino-
lino[3,4b]quinoxaline (6) whose structure was assigned based
on its spectral data. Thus, it's IR (KBr, νmax, cm-1) showed an
1
absorption at ≈3000 (N-H, broad). Its H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) spectrum showed signals at δ 2.62 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.83
(s, 3H, OCH3), 5.56-8.01 (m, 7H aromatic), 3.34 (s, two-NH
protons). Its LC/MS showed the molecular ion peak (M+ + 1)
at (ESI-MS) m/z = 271 corresponding to a molecular mass of
270 when recorded in the Q + 1 mode.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are thankful to the authorities of Osmania
University, Hyderabad, India for providing laboratory facilities
and to the authorities of Jawaharlal Nehru Technological
University, Hyderabad, India for encouragement.
Condensation of p-anisidine (1) with ethyl acetoacetate
in refluxing ethanol gave the previously reported12 ethyl-3-
[(4-methoxyphenyl)imino]butanoate (2) as shown in Scheme-I.
The latter was thermally cyclized by heating at 250 °C using
Dowtherm oil for 0.5 h to obtain 4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2-
methylquinoline (3), which is also known in literature13. Com-
pound 3 on treatment with sulphuryl chloride in chloroform
at room temperature gave 3-chloro-4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2-
methylquinoline (4), which was characterized based on its
spectral data. Thus, its IR showed a diagnostic absorption at a
3275 cm-1 as a medium and broad peak assignable to a -OH
stretching vibration and 1635 cm-1 assignable to -C=O func-
REFERENCES
1. F.W. Muregi and A. Ishish, Drug Dev. Res., 71, 20 (2010).
2. A.-H. Li, E. Ahmed, X. Chen, M. Cox, A.P. Crew, H.-Q. Dong, M. Jin,
L. Ma, B. Panicker, K.W. Siu, A.G. Steinig, K.M. Stolz, P.A.R. Tavares,
B.Volk, Q. Weng, D. Werner and M.J. Mulvihill, J. Org. Biomol. Chem.,
5, 61 (2006).
3. I.A. Mohammed and E. Subramanyam, Acta Pharm. Sci., 51, 163 (2009).
4. E. Rajanarendar, M. Nagi Reddy, S. Rama Krishna, K. Rama Murthy,
Y.N. Reddy and M.V. Rajam, J. Med. Chem., 55, 273 (2012).
5. F. Hayat, A. Salahuddin and A. Azam, J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem.,
26, 472 (2010).
6. M.P. Maguire, K.R. Sheets, K. McVety, A.P. Spada and A. Zilberstein,
J. Med. Chem., 37, 2129 (1994).
7. D.R. Buckle, C.J.M. Rockell, H. Smith and B.A. Spicer, J. Med. Chem.,
29, 2262 (1986).
8. M.P. LaMontagne, A. Markovac and M. Sami Khan, J. Med. Chem.,
25, 964 (1982).
9. K. Kacprzak, Synlett, 943 (2005).
1
tional group. Its H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) spectrum
showed signals at δ 2.62 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3),
5.99-8.01 (m, 3H, aromatic). Its LC/MS (ESI-MS) showed
m/z at 224 and 226 as twin peaks corresponding to molecular
masses of 223 and 225. Compound 4 was then treated with
POCl3 in 1:3 ratio (w/v) under reflux at 105 °C to obtain 3, 4-
dichloro-6-methoxy-2-methylquinoline (5) on processing the
reaction mixture. The structure of compound 5 was confirmed
by its spectral data. Thus, its IR in KBr phase showed the
absence of any absorption in the 3500-3000 cm-1 region and
also in 1800-1600 cm-1 region. Its 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
10. J. Finnerty and H. Wentrup, J. Org. Chem., 70, 9735 (2005).
11. H. Briehl, A. Lukosch and C. Wentrup, J. Org. Chem., 49, 2772 (1984).
12. A.L. Barry, in ed:V.L. Corian, Procedure for TestingAntimicrobialAgents
in Agar Media, Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine, Williams and Wilkins,
Baltimore, MD (1980).
13. K.D. Thomas, A.V. Adhikari and N.S. Shetty, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 45,
3803 (2010).