Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
salt of mellitic acid formed as a side reaction. After washing the
yellowish-brown filter cake three times with a total of 7 L of warm
water, the graphitic oxide residue was dispersed in 16 L of water to
approximately 0.285 g solid. The remaining salt impurities were
removed by treating with resinous anion and cation exchangers. The
dry form of graphitic oxide was obtained by centrifugation followed by
mL of sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.0). The regeneration
of NADH was monitored by a spectrophotometer (UV-1800,
Shimadzu).
4.8. Artificial Photosynthesis of Formic Acid from CO
. The
2
artificial photosynthesis of formic acid from CO was also performed
2
within a quartz reactor under an inert atmosphere at room
temperature, and a 450 W xenon lamp with a 420 nm cutoff-filter
was used as a light source. The reaction was composed of
photocatalyst (0.5 mg), β-NAD (1.24 μmol), rhodium complex
(0.62 μmol), and formate dehydrogenase (3 units) in 3.1 mL of
sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.0) with TEOA (1.24 mmol)
15
dehydration at 40 °C over phosphorus pentoxide.
4.3. Preparation of Chemically Converted Graphene from
Graphene Oxide. For the reduction procedure, dry graphene oxide
was dispersed in deionized water to give a colloidal solution. The pH
of this solution was adjusted to 9−10. Sodium borohydride was
directly added into the solution of graphene oxide dispersion under
magnetic stirring, and the mixture was kept at 80 °C for 1 h with
constant stirring. The reduced product was filtrated and washed with
large amounts of water several times to remove most residual ions.
This moderately reduced graphene oxide was kept in vacuum
desiccators with phosphorus pentoxide for two days, redispersed in
concentrated sulfuric acid, and heated to 120 °C with stirring for 12 h.
After cooling down, the dispersion was diluted with deionized water.
in the presence of CO (flow rate: 0.5 mL/min). After bubbling of
2
CO for 1 h without light (light off), the reactor was exposed to visible
2
light (light on). The amount of formic acid was detected by GC
(7890A, Agilent Technologies).
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
*
S
Supporting Information
15
Synthesis of CCGCMAQSP scheme, XRD, RAMAN, and XPS
The final product was separated by filtration.
.4. Preparation of 5,10,15-[(4-{(3,5-Tris-(dichlorotriazine)}-
aminophenyl)-20-aminophenyl porphyrin] Synthesis of
,10,15-[(4-{(3,5-Tris-(diamino-anthraquinone)triazine}-
inophenyl)-20-aminophenyl porphyrin]. A solution of 5,10,15-
(4-{(3, 5-Tris-(dichlorotriazine)}aminophenyl)-20-aminophenyl por-
phyrin] in THF, amino-anthraquinone (6 mmol), and triethylamine
6.6 mmol) was added and stirried at 80 °C for 10 h. The completion
4
5
AUTHOR INFORMATION
[
(
of the reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC).
The solvent was removed, and the residue was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel using CH Cl /ethyl acetate (50:1 v/v) as
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
2
2
eluent. The title compound was isolated 53% yield. 1H NMR (CGCl3,
δ in ppm): 9.31 (s, 9Haromatic secondary amine), 9.13 (d, 6H ), 8.70 (s,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
g
■
8Hpyrrol), 8.67(m, 18Hf+c+b), 8.51 (m, 18Ha+d+e), 8.46 (d, 8Hi+k, J = 6.6
This work was supported by the KRICT 2020 project program.
Hz), 7.72 (d, 8Hh+j), 4.20 (s, 2Hamine), −2.78 (s, 2Hpyrrol−NH); LC/MS,
+
29,30
ESI (m/z): 2237.78 (M ).
.5. Preparation of CCGCMAQSP. CCG (50 mg) and MAQSP
150 mg) were stirred in DMF (50 mL) in the presence of a catalytic
2
9
REFERENCES
4
■
(
(1) Yfrach, G. S.; Liddell, P. A.; Hung, S. C.; Moore, A. L.; Gust, D.;
Moore, T. A. Nature 1997, 385, 239−241.
(2) Yfrach, G. S.; Rigaud, J. L.; Durantini, E. N.; Moore, A. L.; Gust,
D.; Moore, T. A. Nature 1998, 392, 479−482.
(3) Listorti, A.; Durrant, J.; Barber, J. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 929−930.
(4) (a) Roy, S. C.; Varghese, O. K.; Paulose, M.; Grimes, C. A. ACS
Nano 2010, 4, 1259−1278. (b) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L.
Faraday Discuss. 2012, 155, 9−26.
(5) Park, C. B.; Lee, S. H.; Subramanian, E.; Kale, B. B.; Lee, S. M.;
Baeg, J. O. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5423−5425.
amount of triethylamine (1 mL) at 130 °C for 3 days under argon.
The round bottle flask was removed from oil bath and cooled at room
temperature, and ether (1.5 L) was added to precipitate out the
product. The product was filtered on a membrane filter paper. The
excess unwanted MAQSP and other impurities were removed through
multiple washing with water, followed by sonication, filtration, and
resuspension of the solid in tetrahydrofuran (500 mL). The crude
product was again washed with CHCl /CH Cl many times, via the
3
2
2
same above procedure. UV spectroscopy and TLC were used to check
the filtrate to make sure no MAQSP existed in the final washing. The
(6) Diwald, O.; Tompson, T. L.; Zubkov, T.; Goralski, E. G.; Walck,
S. D.; Yates, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 6004−6008.
(7) Li, D.; Kaner, R. B. Science 2008, 320, 1170−1171.
(8) Dikin, D. A.; Stankovich, S.; Zimney, E. J.; Piner, R. D.;
Dommett, G. H. G.; Evmenenko, G.; Nguyen, S. T.; Ruoff, R. S.
Nature 2007, 448, 457−460.
CCGCMAQSP was then washed with a small amount of H O to
2
remove acid−amine impurities, and eventually dried under vacuum to
2
8,30
yield the hybrid CCGCMAQSP.
The photocatalyst
(
CCGCMAQSP) was analyzed by AFM, FTIR, TGA, DSC, XRD,
Raman spectra, XPS, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (see
Supporting Information).
(9) Chen, H.; Muller, M. B.; Gilmore, K. J.; Wallace, G. G.; Li, D.
Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3557−3561.
4.6. Photoelectrochemical Measurements. Photoelectrochem-
ical measurements were carried out in a three-armed cell consisting of
reference (Ag/AgCl, BASI, MF-2063 RE-5), working (CCGCMAQSP
photoanode), and platinum wire (part no.: CHI115) counter
electrodes using a electrochemical analyzer CHI Instruments 1100A.
A 0.1 M NaCl solution containing 0.4 M TEOA was used as a redox
couple/electrolyte. Newport solar simulator (69911) was used as a
light source. Light intensity was measured by VSLI standard
incorporated Oriel P/N 91150 V.
(10) Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K. S. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183−191.
(11) Zhang, H.; Lv, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. ACS Nano 2010, 4,
380−386.
(12) (a) Williams, G.; Seger, B.; Kamat, P. V. ACS Nano 2008, 2,
1487−1491. (b) Xiang, Q.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012,
41, 782−796.
(13) Lee, C.; Wei, X.; Kysar, J. W.; Hone, J. Science 2008, 321, 385.
(14) Ruppert, R.; Herrmann, S.; Steckhan, E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1988, 1150−1151.
4.7. Photochemical Regeneration of NADH. The photo-
chemical regeneration of NADH was performed within a quartz
reactor under an inert atmosphere at room temperature, and a 450 W
xenon lamp (Newport 66921) with a 420 nm cutoff filter was used as a
light source. The photocatalytic regeneration of NADH was carried
out as follows. The reaction was performed in a quartz reactor. The
reaction was composed with β-NAD (1.24 μmol), rhodium complex
(15) Gao, W.; Alemany, L. B.; Ci, L.; Ajayan, P. M. Nat. Chem. 2009,
1, 403−408.
(16) Ang, P. K.; Wang, S.; Bao, Q.; Thong, J. T. L.; Loh, K. P. ACS
Nano 2009, 3, 3587−3594.
(17) Niyogi, S.; Bekyarova, E.; Itkis, M. E.; McWilliams, J. L.;
Hamon, M. A.; Haddon, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7720−
7721.
(
0.62 μmol), TEOA (1.24 mmol), and photocatalyst (0.5 mg) in 3.1
1
1460
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja3009902 | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11455−11461