2092
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 57, No. 10, October, 2008
Magdesieva et al.
Table 1. The yield and current efficiency of electrocatalytic
Scheme 1
oxidative coupling of alkynes (0.1 mmol) in MeCN : H O =
2
–
8
2
0 : 1 in the presence of the catalyst (3.2•10 mol) at a potenꢀ
tial of –0.55 V (vs. Ag/AgCl/KCl)
Substrate
Product
Yield (%)
by current by substance
PhC≡CH
PrC≡CH
PhC≡C—C≡CPh
PrC≡C—C≡CPr
81
63
75
81
66
77
Me SiC≡CH Me SiC≡C—C≡CSiMe
3
3
3
Reduction of dioxygen in the catalytic cycle is known16
to proceed with formation of either H O (the consumpꢀ
2
2
tion of two electrons) or H O (the consumption of four
2
electrons). The cyclic voltammetry investigation of the
solutions obtained after electrolysis showed no even traces
of hydrogen peroxide, which could be detected by its
characteristic reduction peak at a potential of –1.29 V
The work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project Nos 08ꢀ03ꢀ00142
and 07ꢀ03ꢀ90824).
(
see Ref. 16). The application of the chemical tests (e.g.,
with KI) also gave a negative result. Consequently, fourꢀ
References
electron reduction of O to water does occur in the invesꢀ
2
tigated catalytic cycle, thus making the reaction ecologiꢀ
cally friendly.
The formal reaction stoichiometry can be presented as
follows:
1. E. A. Lewis, W. B. Tolman, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 1047
2. S. Itoh, Curr. Opin. in Chem. Biol., 2006, 10, 115.
3
4
. J. P. Klinman, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2541.
. M. Mirica, X. Ottenwaelder,T. D. P. Stack, Chem. Rev.,
2
004, 104, 1013.
+
–
+
Cu + O + 2 RC≡СН + e + 2 H →
5. F. Paul, C. Lapinte, Coord. Chem. Revs, 1998, 178—180,
431.
2
2
+
→
Cu + RC≡С—С≡СR + 2 H O.
2
6
7
8
9
. A. S. Hay, J. Org. Chem., 1960, 25, 1275.
. A. S. Hay, J.Org.Chem., 1962, 27, 3320.
. M. D. Cameron, G. E. Bennet, J. Org. Chem., 1957, 567.
. Chemistry of Acetylenes, Ed. H. V. Gunter, Marcell Dekker,
New York, 1969, 597.
Four electrons, which are necessary for the reduction
of dioxygen to water, are supplied by the molecules of the
alkyne that is oxidized (two electrons per two molecules
II
I
of alkyne) and the electrode (due to the Cu /Cu reducꢀ
tion and the regeneration of the catalyst). Water is the
source of additional protons. Special experiments showed
that the process does not occur (the current value is zero)
in thoroughly dried acetonitrile and when the air specially
dried by passing through the vessel with concentrated
H SO is bubbled through the cell.
10. G. E. Jones, D. A. Kendrick, A. B. Holmes, Org. Synth.
Coll., 1993, 8, 63.
1
1
1
1
1. R. Salazar, L. Fomina, S. Fomine, Polymer Bull., 2001, 47,
51.
2. L. Fomina, B. Vazquez, E. Tkatchouk, S. Fomine, Tetrahedron,
002, 58, 6741.
3. T. V. Magdesieva, K. P. Butin, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2002, 71,
23.
4. T. V. Magdesieva, A. V. Dolganov, A. V. Yakimansky,
M. Ya. Goikhman, I. V. Podeshvo, V. V. Kudryavtsev, Russ.
J. Electrochem., 2007, 43, 1133.
1
2
2
4
The elucidation of the reaction mechanism is not a
2
subject of the present study. However, based on literature
data,1
2,17
an active Cu complex with molecular oxygen
I
can be assumed to serve as an oxidant. Unfortunately, we
were not able to determine the type of the oxygenꢀconꢀ
taining adduct. The reason for that was the immobilizaꢀ
tion of the catalyst on the graphite electrode, which makes
impossible the registration of the electronic absorption
spectra, which usually serve as a major diagnostic criteꢀ
15. T. Magdesieva, A. Dolganov, A. Yakimansky, M. Goikhman,
I. Podeshvo, V. Kudryavtsev, Electrochimica Acta, 2008, 53,
3
960.
1
1
6. D. T. Sawyer , J. S. Valentine, Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 393.
7. K. Wieghardt, P. Chaudhury, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 35,
3
29
4
rion of the structure of the intermediate. The realization
1
8. V. L. Kornienko, I. V. Chaevko, G. V. Kornienko, in
1
8
of the catalytic cycle involving the peroxide anion might
Electrochemistry of Organic Compounds in the Beginning of
be considered as an alternative mechanism but, as it has
2
1st Century, Sputnik, Moscow, 2008, p. 147.
been showed earlier,1
4,15
in the presence of copper comꢀ
plexes this route seems to be unlikely.
Received June 26, 2008;
in revised form October 2, 2008
The catalytic cycle in shown in Scheme 1.