6
220
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6220-6224
Structures and Reactivities of Ethylene Dication Electrophiles
Tomohiko Ohwada,* Takahisa Yamazaki, Takayoshi Suzuki, Shinichi Saito, and
Koichi Shudo
Contribution from the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UniVersity of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo,
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
X
ReceiVed October 30, 1995. ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed April 25, 1996
Abstract: 1,2-Dicarbonyl compounds such as 2,3-butanedione reacted with benzene in the presence of a strong
acid, trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, to give gem-diphenylated ketones in high yield. The monoxime derivative of
1
,2-diones also reacted with benzene in the acid, but slowly enough to allow discrimination of monophenylated and
diphenylated oximes. The reactive electrophiles in these Friedel-Crafts reactions are considered to be O,O-
diprotonated 1,2-dicarbonyl species and N,O-diprotonated ketoxime, i.e., related ethylene dications differentiated by
a single different heteroatom substituent, a hydroxy or a hydroxyamino group. The reactivity depends on the electron-
donating ability of substituents adjacent to the reaction center.
High-level theoretical calculations were successful in predict-
1,2-dicarbonyl species and N,O-diprotonated ketoxime, i.e.,
related ethylene dications differentiated by a single different
heteroatom substituent (a hydroxy or a hydroxyamino group)
adjacent to the reaction center.
ing the unusual anti-van’t Hoff perpendicular structure, rather
than planar geometry, of the ethylene dication (C2H42+). Ab
initio calculations also revealed that multiple substitution of the
1
2
a,3
ethylene dication with π-donating groups such as hydroxy,
fluoro,2 or amino groups tends to stabilize the planar geometry
relative to the perpendicular geometry. For example, in the
cases of fluoro and amino substitutions, the mono- and disub-
b
4
Results and Discussion
Acid-Catalyzed Reaction of 2,3-Butanedione. 2,3-Butane-
dione (1a) reacted with benzene in the presence of trifluo-
romethanesulfonic acid (TFSA) at 5 °C to give 3,3-diphenyl-
2-butanone (2a) in 94% yield (Scheme 1) (Table 1). The
product is probably formed through diphenylation of one of the
carbonyl groups. The reaction depends on the acidity of the
medium, as judged from the yield of the product. At H0 ) -8
to -9, where the medium is sufficiently acidic to monoprotonate
the dione (at least partially) to give the monocation 3 (Scheme
stituted dications C2H3X2 and 1,1-C2H2X2 take perpendicular
+
2+
structures, whereas the tri- and tetrasubstituted dications C2-
HX3 and C2X4 favor planar structures.1 Apart from the
2
+
2+
intriguing structural dichotomy, the ethylene dications can be
regarded as reactive electrophiles involving (at least formally)
5
,6
adjacent carbenium centers, i.e., gitonic superelectrophiles.
Ethylene dications substituted with two gem-diphenyl groups
3a,c
undergo facile electrocyclization to give fluorene derivatives.
9
,10
2
),
essentially no reaction takes place. But, an increase of
However, the electrophilic behavior of ethylene dications in
7
the acidity to -11 (H0) gave 2a in a yield of 62%, and the
conversion was quantitative in 50% TFSA-50% TFA (H0 )
Friedel-Crafts reactions is still little understood. Diprotonation
1
2
of 1,2-diones in strong acids has been shown to afford O ,O -
-
12). In TFSA the reaction is very rapid. The heterogeneity
diprotonated 1,2-diones, i.e., 1,2-dihydroxyethylene dications
11
8
of the reaction precludes quantitative kinetic studies. However
this acidity-dependent behavior of the reaction implies that an
additional protonation is required to increase the electrophilicity
4
, and therefore we chose to examine the Friedel-Crafts
reaction of 1,2-diones 1 and some derivatives with benzene in
the presence of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TFSA). While
,2-diones react readily with two benzenes to give gem-diphenyl
ketones 2, an oxime derivative of a 1,2-dione reacts slowly,
allowing discrimination of monophenylation and diphenylation.
Reactive electrophiles in these Friedel-Crafts reactions have
been demonstrated by direct observation to be O,O-diprotonated
1
13
of the attacking cation 3. The H and C chemical shifts of
the species formed from 1a in TFSA-SbF5 (mole ratio 2.5:1)
correspond well to those of the O,O-diprotonated 2,3-butane-
dione 4 formed in FSO3H-SbF5 (see Tables 2 and 3).12
Therefore, the efficient conversion of 1a at high acidities is
consistent with the intervention of the O,O-diprotonated 2,3-
1
X
Abstract published in AdVance ACS Abstracts, June 15, 1996.
(1) Observation: Benoit, C.; Horsley, J. A. Mol. Phys. 1975, 30, 557.
(9) The acidity (H0) of the trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TFSA)-
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) system has been described: Saito, S.; Saito, S.;
Ohwada, T.; Shudo, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991, 39, 2718-2720. See
also: Saito, S.; Sato, Y.; Ohwada, T.; Shudo, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 2312-2317, footnote 8.
(10) (a) Protonation of ketones: Paspaleev, E.; Kojucharova, A. Monatsch.
Chem. 1969, 100, 1213. (b) Protonation of imines: Childs, R. F.; Dickie,
B. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 5041. (c) Protonation of oximes: Allen,
M.; Roberts, J. D. Can. J. Chem. 1981, 39, 451-458.
(11) The possible solubility increase of benzene in the case of the higher
acidity seems to affect the rate of reactions. However, the increase of
benzene may be caused by the production of benzenium ions which may
not be a substrate for the electrophile. Even if this was the case, the very
slow reaction in the medium which is acidic enough to monoprotonate the
substrate completely definitely eliminates the possibility of the participation
of the monoprotonated species.
(12) Though some difference in solvent effect may exist, the presence
of the same diprotonated species in TFSA is in accordance with the normal
acid-base equilibrium.
Theoretical calculations: Lammertsma, K.; Barzaghi, M.; Olah, G. A.;
Pople, J. A.; Kos, A. J.; Schleyer, P. v. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
5
252.
2) (a) Koch, W.; Frenking, G.; Schwarz, H. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion
(
Processes 1985, 63, 59-82. (b) Frenking, G.; Koch, W.; Schwarz, H. J.
Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 406-416.
(
3) (a) Ohwada, T.; Shudo, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1862-
1
870. (b) Ohwada, T.; Shudo, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 34-40. (c)
Ohwada, T.; Shudo, K. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 5227-5237.
(4) Frenking, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2476-2481.
(5) Olah, G. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 767-788.
(6) Olah, G. A.; Hartz, N.; Rasul, G.; Burrichter, A.; Prakash, G. K. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6421-6427.
7) A part of the work has been communicated: Yamazaki, T.; Saito,
S.; Ohwada, T.; Shudo, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5749-5752.
8) Olah, G. A.; Calin, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 4672-4675.
Olah, G. A.; Grant, J. L.; Westerman, P. W. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 2102-
108.
(
(
2
S0002-7863(95)03623-7 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society