Hypericin and Its Hexamethoxy Analog
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 13, 1997 2981
was added dropwise amide 2 (2.37 g, 10 mmol) in 15 mL of THF.
The mixture was stirred at -78 °C for 1 h, whereupon aldehyde 3
(1.66 g, 10 mmol) in 15 mL of THF was added dropwise over 5 min.
The resulting mixture was stirred at -78 °C for 1 h. Saturated
ammonium chloride solution (20 mL) was added. The solution was
diluted with 100 mL of ether and partitioned. The organic layer was
separated, washed with water and brine, and dried over MgSO4. After
concentration in vacuo, the residue was purified by sgc using 4:1 H:EA
to provide 3.90 g (97% yield) of 4 as a light yellow oil.
like fluorescence and the rise time of fluorescence in hypericin
was taken as evidence for intramolecular excited-state proton
transfer in hypericin.19 (In this article, we use the term “proton
transfer” very loosely. Our current knowledge of the excited
state transfer process is not detailed enough to specify whether
the process is a proton or an atom transfer.35)
This conclusion initially met with some resistance, despite
the precedent set by the large number of organic molecules
where the proximity of the enol and keto groups provides an
environment that is propitious for excited-state intramolecular
proton transfer or hydrogen atom transfer (in this article, we
use the two terms interchangeably): for example, malonalde-
hyde,14 salicylic acid,15 3-hydroxyflavone,16 benzothiazole,17 and
tropolone18 are but a few of the examples of a litany of species
that execute intramolecular excited-state proton transfer.
One argument proferred against intramolecular excited-state
proton transfer in hypericin is the observation of near mirror-
image symmetry between its absorption and emission spectra.
Such symmetry is typically taken as a signature of negligible
structural changes between the absorbing and the emitting
species. Intramolecular excited-state proton transfer usually
generates a broad structureless emission spectrum that bears little
resemblance to the absorbance spectrum. 3-Hydroxyflavone
provides a good example.
There are at least two ways to respond to this objection. It
is possible that the structural changes induced by proton transfer
do not significantly effect the electronic structure of the
tautomeric species (Figure 1a-c) in such a way as to destroy
the mirror-image symmetry. High-level quantum chemical
calculations will have much to offer in understanding this
problem. It is also possible, as we have argued elsewhere,6,7
that the ground-state of hypericin is already partially tautomer-
ized and that this ground-state heterogeneity yields the observed
mirror-image symmetry between absorption and emission
spectra.
Here we revisit the questions of ground-state heterogeneity
and nonradiative processes. We compare the excited-state
transients of hypericin obtained previously using an excitation
wavelength of 588 nm6,7 with results obtained from a regen-
eratively amplified and frequency-doubled Ti:sapphire laser
providing an excitation wavelength of 415 nm. Changes in the
kinetics using different excitation wavelengths is suggestive of
ground-state heterogeneity in hypericin. We also present the
synthesis of the hypericin analog with no labile protons,
hexamethoxyhypericin (Figure 1e, compound 1), and compare
its excited-state transients with those of hypericin. This analog
displays no rise time for stimulated emission, which we have
taken as the signature of intramolecular excited-state proton
transfer, and it displays no excited-state transients that can be
interpreted in terms of proton transfer.
4: NMR (CDCl3) d 6.61 (d, J ) 3 Hz, 1 H), 6.53 (d, J ) 3 Hz, 2
H), 6.50 (d, J ) 3 Hz, 2 H), 6.38-6.30 (m, 4 H), 6.26 (t, J ) 3 Hz,
1 H), 5.71 (s, 1 H), 5.53 (d, J ) 6 Hz, 1 H), 5.35 (d, J ) 9 Hz, 1 H),
3.83 (s, 3 H), 3.76 (s, 6 H), 3.74 (s, 3 H), 3.72 (s, 6 H), 3.68 (s, 3 H),
3.68-2.40 (m, 8 H), 1.3-0.75 (m, 12 H); IR (KBr) 3367, 2938, 1602,
1459, 1154, 840 cm-1; MS (EI) m/e 403, 330 (100), 315, 299, 271,
193; HRMS C22H29O6 calcd 403.19949; measured 403.19919.
ii. 5,7-Dimethoxy-3-(3′,5′-dimethoxyphenyl)isobenzofuran-1-one,
5. A solution of 4 (4.00 g, 10 mmol) and pTSA (100 mg) in 200 mL
of toluene was heated to reflux for 2 h. The organic solution was
washed with 2% sodium bicarbonate, water, and brine and dried.
Removal of the solvent by concentration in vacuo yielded 3.27 g (99%
yield) of 5 as white crystals (mp 182-184 °C).
1
5: H NMR (CDCl3) d 6.39 (m, 4 H), 6.28 (m, 1 H), 6.09 (brs, 1
H), 3.94 (s, 3 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.73 (s, 6 H); IR (KBr) 2843, 1771,
1600, 1113, 1007, 833 cm-1 13C NMR (CDCl3) d 55.52, 56.03, 56.15,
.
81.34, 98.38, 99.20, 100.91, 104.70, 106.16, 139.18, 154.68, 159.57,
161.25, 167.02, 168.45; MS (EI) m/e 330 (100), 300, 271, 257, 193,
165; HRMS C18H18O6 calcd 330.11034, measured 330.10952.
iii. 2,4-Dimethoxy-6-(3′,5′-dimethoxyphenylmethyl)benzoic acid,
6. A mixture of 5 (300 g, 90 mmol) and 10% Pd/C (500 mg) in 100
mL of ethyl acetate was stirred under a hydrogen atmosphere for 48 h
The suspension was carefully filtered, and the solvent was removed in
vacuo The resulting product was purified by recrystallization from
H:EA to provide 278 g (93% yield) of 6 as colorless crystals (mp 163-
164 °C).
6: 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 6.39 (d, J ) 3 Hz, 1 H), 6.36 (d, J ) 2 Hz,
1 H), 6.33 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 1 H), 6.28 (d, J ) 3 Hz, 1 H), 4.23 (br s, 2
H), 3.92 (s, 3 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 3.72 (s, 6 H); IR (KBr) 2930, 1694,
1606, 1153, 1081, 844; 13C NMR (CDCl3) d 170.32, 162.29, 160.79,
159.24, 144.30, 142.60, 144.30, 142.60, 113.57, 108.31, 107.32, 98.30,
96.82, 56.41, 55.47, 55.31, 40.07; MS (EI) m/e 332, 314, 299, 241,
213, 139; HRMS C18H20O6 calcd 332.12599, measured 332.12572.
iv. 1,3,6,8-Tetramethoxyanthracen-9-one, 7. To a solution of 6
(1.66 g, 5.0 mmol) in 100 mL of methylene chloride at 0 °C was added
trifluroacetic anhydride (1.05 g, 5.0 mmol) dropwise over 10 min. The
solution was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h. Twenty milliliters of methanol
was added, followed by 150 mL of 5% sodium bicarbonate. The
aqueous layer was extracted with 30 mL of methylene chloride. The
combined organic layers were washed with water and brine and dried.
After concentration in vacuo, the residue was purified by sgc using
5:1 H:EA to provide 1.41 g of 7 (90% yield) as light yellow crystals
(mp 207-208 °C).
7: 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 10.65 (s, 1 H), 7.43 (s, 1 H), 6.60 (d, J ) 3
Hz, 2 H), 6.29 (d, J ) 3 Hz, 2 H), 4.01 (s, 6 H), 3.89 (s, 6 H); IR
(KBr) 3319, 2996, 1630, 1578, 1562, 1370, 808; MS (EI) m/e 314
(100), 285, 271, 213, 185, 157; HRMS C18H18O5 314.11542, measured
314.11554.
v. 1,3,4,6,8,10,11,13-Octamethoxy phenanthro[1,10, 9, 8-opqra]-
perylene, 1. To a solution of anthrone 7 (1.30 g, 4.0 mmol) in 20 mL
of boiling EtOH was added a solution of ferric chloride hexahydrate
(1.48 g, 5.5 mmol) in 40 mL of EtOH over 10 min. The mixture was
heated at reflux for 30 min, cooled, and poured into 600 mL of 5%
HCl. The aqueous mixture was extracted three times with 100 mL of
EtOAc. The combined organic layers were washed with water and
brine and dried over magnesium sulfate.
After the solvent was concentrated in vacuo, the residue was mixed
with 5 g of KOH and 100 mL of EtOH and heated to reflux for 5 min.
The mixture was cooled to 0 °C, and K2S2O8 (1.35 g, 15.0 mmol) in
20 mL of water was added dropwise over 5 min at 0 °C. The mixture
was stirred at ambient temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was
then poured into 500 mL of 1% HCl and extracted three times with
100 mL of ethyl acetate. The combined organic layers were washed
Experimental Section
A. Synthesis. i. N,N-Diethyl 2,4-Dimethoxy-6-(hydroxy-3′,5′-
dimethoxyphenylmethyl)benzamide, 4. To a solution of TMEDA
(1.28 g, 11 mmol) and s-BuLi (11 mmol) in 50 mL of THF at -78 °C
(14) Carrington, T., Jr.; Miller, W. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 84, 4364.
(15) Barbara, P. F.; Walsh, P. K.; Brus, L. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93,
29-34.
(16) (a) Brucker, G. A.; Swinney, T. C.; Kelley, D. F. J. Phys. Chem.
1991, 95, 3190-3195. (b) Strandjord, A. J. G.; Barbara, P. F. J. Phys. Chem.
1985, 89, 2355-2361. (c) McMorrow, D.; Kasha, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1984,
88, 2235-2243. (d) Brucker, G. A.; Kelley, D. F. J. Phys. Chem. 1987,
91, 2856-2861. (e) Schwartz, B. J.; Peteanu, L. A.; Harris, C. B. J. Phys.
Chem. 1992, 96, 3591-3598.
(17) (a) Frey, W.; Laermer, F.; Elsaesser, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95,
10391-10395. (b) Laermer, F.; Elsaesser, T.; Kaiser, W. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1988, 148, 119-124.
(18) Ensminger, F. A.; Plassard, J.; Zwier, T. S.; Hardinger, S. J. Chem.
Phys. 1993, 99, 8341-8344.