10.1002/chem.201804016
Chemistry - A European Journal
COMMUNICATION
While initial formation of the cyclic intermediates 7Occ and 7Ncc
is possible through reaction of monoadduct 6cc with another
monomer 1c, interconversion is also possible via transition state
TSRcc located +58.8 kJmol−1 above 7Ncc. Uretdione 2c is
exclusively formed from cyclic intermediate 7Ncc through
transition state TSD0cc. Dimer 2c is then able to react with
monoadduct 6cc forming previously unreported spiro-
intermediate 9cc, which is conceptually similar to the spiro-
tetramers formed by reductive oligomerization in the presence of
silanes reported by Süss-Fink.[10] Acyclic, trimeric intermediate
8cc is either formed by interconversion of 9cc through transition
state TSD2cc or by addition of one molecule of 1c to cyclic adduct
7Occ through transition state TS3cc. Trimers 3c and 4c are finally
obtained from 8cc via the low-lying transition states TS5cc and
TS4cc. Based on both the experimental and computational
results, we propose the revised reaction mechanism shown in
Scheme 3.
In conclusion, we provide here a comprehensive study on the
phosphane-catalyzed oligomerization of aliphatic isocyanates,
which includes the validation of earlier 31P NMR and kinetic
measurements,[2a] and the combined experimental/theoretical
analysis of 15N and 31P NMR spectral data in reactions of 15N-
labeled isocyanates. Calculation of the potential energy surface
leads us to a revised reaction mechanism featuring previously
unknown spiro intermediate 9 formed from uretdione 2. Cyclic
intermediate 7N is responsible for the signals visible at low
temperature NMR measurements as shown by the prediction of
31P, 15N and 13C chemical shifts. Further evidence was obtained
from the 31P-15N couplings and the multiplicities found for signals
in low temperature NMR measurements. The new mechanism
provides the basis for a better understanding of an important
industrial process and its possible improvement through the
development of new catalyst systems. This study also shows the
potential of the employed methodology to solve further
For all intermediates found in the revised mechanism, 13C, 15N,
and 31P NMR chemical shifts were predicted at the B3LYP/IGLO-
III//B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory (see SI). The methodology
used combines theoretically calculated shieldings for the ethyl-
substituted systems shown in Figure 4 with a system of
increments for the influence of longer alkyl chain substituents. The
predicted 31P chemical shifts perfectly fit our assignment of cyclic,
pentacoordinate intermediate 7Nab to the signals reported by
Horvath and Richter (theor. predicted -55.2 ppm, exp. found -55.6
unanswered
questions
of
isocyanate
activation
by
organocatalysts.[11]
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Dr. D. Stephenson (LMU München) for
recording the low-temperature NMR spectra, Dr. F. Richter
(Covestro AG) for fruitful discussions and the Leibnitz
Supercomputer Centre (www.lrz.de) for generous allocation of
computational resources.
ppm here and -55.0 ppm in ref. 2).[2a] In addition, the predicted 31
P
chemical shift for acyclic intermediate 7Lab of +29.3 ppm is that
for a "typical" phosphonium species. In case of 15N NMR
spectroscopy, the predicted signals vary more from the measured
ones, probably because of the partially anionic character of the
nitrogen atoms in the intermediates that was not reflected in our
set of reference compounds. Still, 7Nab is the only intermediate
whose predicted NMR shifts fit for all three measured nuclei in
complete agreement with all other results.
Keywords: Computational chemistry, isotopic labelling, Lewis
base organocatalysis, NMR spectroscopy, reaction mechanisms
[1]
[2]
a) C. Six, F. Richter in Isocyanates, Organic, Ullman's Encyclopedia of
Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, 2003; b) F. Richter, Nachr. Chem. 2007,
55, 380 – 384.
a) Z. Pusztai, G. Vlad, A. Bodor, I. T. Horvath, H. J. Laas, R. Halpaap, F.
U. Richter, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 107 – 110; Angew. Chem.
2006, 118, 113 – 116. b) H. J. Laas, R. Halpaap, J. Pedain, J. Prakt.
Chem. 1994, 336, 185 – 200.
[3]
a) S. M. Raders, J. G. Verkade, J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5308 – 5311; b)
H. A. Duong, M. J. Cross, J. Louie, Org. Lett. 2004, 25, 4679 – 4681.
U. Tracht, F. U. Richter, Macromol. Symp. 2013, 324, 33 – 40.
J. N. Gibb, J. M. Goodman, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 90 – 97.
a) B. E. Mann, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1972, 1, 30 – 34; b) B.
Maryasin, H. Zipse, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 5150 – 5158,
c) M. M. Kayser, K. L. Hatt, D. L. Hooper, Can. J. Chem. 1991, 69, 1929
– 1939.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
J. S. Tang, J. G. Verkade, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1993, 32, 896 – 898;
Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 934 – 936.
a) F. U. Richter, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 5200 – 5202; b) D. Heift, Z.
Benko, H. Grützmacher, A. R. Jupp, J. M. Goicoechea, Chem. Sci. 2015,
6, 4017 – 4024.
[9]
a) A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648 – 5652; b) S. Grimme, J.
Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 034108-1; c) A. V. Marenich, C. J. Cramer, D.
[10] a) G. Süss-Fink, G. Herrmann, G. F. Schmidt, Polyhedron 1988, 7, 2341
– 2344; b) G. Herrmann, G. Süss-Fink, Chem. Ber. 1985, 118, 3959 –
3965; c) G. Süss-Fink, G. Herrmann, U. Thewalt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1983, 22, 880 – 881; Angew. Chem. 1983, 95, 899 – 900.
Figure 5. Comparison of predicted and experimentally obtained 31P, 15N and
13C NMR shifts.
[11] a) H. Sardon, A. Pascual, D. Mecerreyes, D. Taton, H. Cramail, J. L.
Hedrick, Macromolecules 2015, 48, 3153 – 3165; b) J. Alsarraf, Y. A.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.