46 J ournal of Chemical and Engineering Data, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2001
agreement (within the boundaries of experimental uncer-
devoid of sterical interaction and apparently does not
tainties) with those ∆rH° (l)(equilibrium) derived from the
contribute to strain. Because of this, one can ensure that
no additional group-additivity parameters or correction
terms are necessary (besides the correction for strain HS
) 10.9 kJ ‚mol-1 like in tert-butylbenzene) for the group-
m
chemical equilibria studies. Hence, the important assump-
tion that values of Kx in excess alkanol are indistinguish-
able from the thermodynamic constants Ka could be
generalized for ether synthesis reactions.
contribution correlation for ∆fH° (g) of alkyl cumyl ethers.
m
The thermodynamic consistency observed allows us to
calculate the enthalpy of formation of propyl cumyl ether
Liter a tu r e Cited
∆fH° (l) ) -(257.4 ( 2.4) kJ ‚mol-1 from the known en-
m
(1) Izquierdo, J . F.; Cunill, F.; Vila, M.; Iborra, M.; Tejero, J .
Equilibrium Constants for Methyl tert-Butyl Ether and Ethyl tert-
Butyl Ether Liquid-Phase Synthesis Using C4 Olefinic Cut. Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 2830-2835.
(2) Rihko, L.; Linnekoski, J . A.; Krause, A. Reaction Equilibria in
the Synthesis of 2- Methoxy-2-Methylbutane in the Liquid Phase.
J . Chem. Eng. Data 1994, 39, 700-704.
(3) Heintz, A.; Verevkin, S. P. Simultaneous study of chemical and
vapor-liquid equilibria in the reacting system of the methyl cumyl
ether synthesis from methanol and R-methyl- styrene. Fluid
Phase Equilib., in press.
thalpies of formation of propanol and R-methylstyrene and
the standard enthalpy of reaction obtained from the
temperature dependence of Kx (see Table 6).
4.2. Str a in En th a lpies HS of Alkyl Cu m yl Eth er s. An
important test to establish the validity of the experimental
and calculation procedures presented in this paper provides
the comparison of strain enthalpies of alkyl cumyl ethers,
which could be derived from their gaseous standard molar
enthalpies of formation ∆fH° (g) at 298.15 K (Table 6).
m
(4) Benson, S. W. Thermochemical Kinetics; Wiley: New York, 1976,
Indeed, the methyl, ethyl, propyl, and butyl cumyl ethers
listed in Table 6 present a typical example of the homologi-
cal. It is well established that for homologic rows such as
p 274.
(5) Simirsky, V. V.; Kabo, G. J .; Frenkel, M. L. Additivity of the
enthalpies of formation of urea derivatives in the crystalline state.
J . Chem. Thermodyn. 1987, 19, 1121-1927.
alkanes or alkanols14 the enthalpic contribution to ∆fH°
m
(6) Skuratov, S. M.; Kolesov, V. P.; Vorobe´v, V. F. Thermochemistry;
(g) from the CH2 group should remain constant. In other
words, no additional strain interactions in a molecule are
expected by passing from methyl to butyl cumyl ether. The
Moscow: Moscow State University, 1966.
(7) Hubbard, W. N.; Scott, D. W.; Waddington, G. In Experimental
Thermochemistry; Rossini, F. D., Ed.; Interscience: New York,
1956, pp 75-127.
(8) Atomic weights of the elements. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66,
2423-2444.
resulting values of ∆fH° (g) of alkyl cumyl ether calculated
m
as the sum of ∆fH° (l) and ∆gl H° are shown in Tables 6
m
m
and 8.
(9) Verevkin, S. P. Measurement and Prediction of the Monocarbox-
ylic Acids Thermochemical Properties. J . Chem. Eng. Data 2000,
45, 953-960.
We define the strain enthalpy HS of a molecule as the
difference between the experimental standard enthalpy of
formation ∆fH° (g) and the calculated sum of the strain-
m
(10) CODATA Key Values for Thermodynamics; Cox, J . D., Wagman,
free Benson type increments4 for this molecule. The strain-
free increments for the calculation of enthalpies of forma-
tion of alkanes,15 alkylbenzenes,16 and ethers17,18 are
already well established. By using these group-additivity
D. D., Medvedev, V. A., Eds.; Hemisphere: New York, 1989.
(11) Chickos, J . S.; Hosseini, S.; Hesse, D. G.; Liebman, J . F. Heat
Capacity Corrections to a Standard State: A Comparison of New
and Some Literature Methods for Organic Liquids and Solids.
Struct. Chem. 1993, 4, 271-278.
(12) Verevkin, S. P. Thermochemical investigation on R-methyl-styrene
and parent phenyl substituted alkenes. Thermochim. Acta 1999,
326, 17-25.
parameters and the values of ∆fH° (g) of cumyl deriva-
m
tives (Table 8), their values of strain enthalpies HS
)
{∆fH° (g) - ∑ increments} have been estimated (Table 8).
m
All alkyl cumyl ethers studied here are very similarly
(13) Chao, J .; Rossini, F. D. Heats of combustion, formation, and
isomerization of nineteen alkanols. J . Chem. Eng. Data 1965, 10,
374-379.
(14) Mosselman, C.; Dekker, H. Enthalpies of formation of n-alkan-
1-ols. J . Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1975, 417-424.
(15) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Williams, J . E.; Blanchard, K. B. The evaluation
of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its
origin. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2377-2386.
(16) Beckhaus, H.-D. Force Field for the Calculation of Structure and
Enthalpy of Formation of Alkylbenzenes. Chem. Ber. 1983, 116,
86-96.
(17) Rakus, K.; Verevkin, S. P.; Peng, W.-H.; Beckhaus, H.-D.;
Ru¨chardt, C. Geminal Substituent Effects. 11 The Anomeric Effect
in Orthoesters. The Concept of Geminal Pairwise Interactions for
the Interpretation of Enthalpies of Formation. Liebigs Ann. 1995,
2059-2067.
(18) Verevkin, S. P.; Beckhaus, H.-D.; Belen’kaja, R. S.; Rakus, K.;
Ru¨chardt, C. Geminal Substituent Effects. 9. Enthalpies of
Formation and Strain Free Increments of Branched Esters and
Ethers. Thermochim. Acta 1996, 279, 47-64.
(19) Verevkin, S. P. Strain effects in phenyl substituted methanes.
Geminal interaction between phenyl and electron releasing
substituent in benzylamines and benzyl alcohols. J . Chem. Eng.
Data 1999, 44, 1245-1251.
strained by about 10 kJ ‚mol-1 (Table 8). This fact is a
further indication that the data for ∆fH° (g) of alkyl cumyl
m
ethers, obtained by combining the different experimental
techniques (calorimetry, transpiration, equilibrium study),
are generally consistent, supporting the confidence in the
experimental procedures used. To ascertain the strain
effect, we also involved in the interpretation our recent
result (see Table 8) for cumyl alcohol.19 Cumyl alcohol also
exhibits an amount of strain similar to that for alkyl cumyl
ethers (see Table 8). What reasons cause strain in these
molecules? Elucidation of the nature of strain in alkyl
cumyl ethers is aided by comparison with the strain of the
similar shaped tert-butylbenzene,20 ∆fH° (g) ) -(24.42 (
m
0.80) kJ‚mol-1, and the strain enthalpy, HS ) 10.9 kJ‚mol-1
.
tert-Butylbenzene is a relevant structural pattern of strain
in the cumyl derivatives studied. Its strain enthalpy is a
reflection of the intrinsic strain of the molecule due to steric
repulsions of methyl groups and the benzene ring attached
to the central quaternary carbon atom. It is expected from
the analogy with the strain of tert-butylbenzene that the
observed amount of destabilization in cumyl derivatives
could no doubt be attributed to the steric repulsions of
methyl groups and the benzene ring attached to the central
quaternary carbon atom. Because cumyl ethers and cumyl
alcohol are strained similarly by about 8 to 10 kJ ‚mol-1
(Table 8), it is evident that strain in cumyl derivatives is
governed only by steric interactions of methyl groups and
the benzene ring while the OH or alkoxy group is rather
(20) Verevkin, S. P. Thermochemical Properties of Branched Alkyl
substituted Benzenes. J . Chem. Thermodyn. 1998, 30, 1029-1040.
(21) Verevkin, S. P. Thermochemistry of Phenols. Quantification of
the Ortho-, Para-, and Meta- interactions in Tert-alkyl Substi-
tuted Phenols. J . Chem. Thermodyn. 1999, 31, 559-585.
Received for review May 29, 2000. Accepted September 4, 2000.
J E000162A