(entries 1, 3-6); nonpolar solvents seemed to favor the desired
isomer, but the reaction was extremely slow. The major product
where good conversion was achieved was the undesired C-4
isomer, 5. However, in our investigation of additive counterions,
we noted that addition of copper salts (entry 9) to the standard
reaction had a beneficial effect on the regioselectivity and
inverted the ratio in favor of attack at C-2 to give 4 as the major
isomer. In another experiment, adding a small amount of
pyridine to the reaction in order to solubilize the copper salts
further increased the ratio of products in favor of 4 (entry 12).
In an attempt to separate counterion from solvent effects, we
ran the reaction with potassium tert-butoxide in pyridine in the
absence of copper catalyst (entry 14). Desired isomer 4 was
still the major one, but to a lesser extent. When pyridine was
used as solvent with potassium tert-butoxide and a catalytic
amount of a copper salt, none of the undesired regioisomer could
be detected. The only other product of the reaction arose from
displacement of both chlorides by the phenol. The amount of
the bis-adduct formed could be minimized by adjusting the
stoichiometry of mesitol and base relative to 3. Under the
optimized conditions (1.1 equiv of each), <5% of this bis-adduct
was formed, and was largely purged during isolation.
A rate enhancement was also observed. In all the other
reactions shown, the ether formation was sluggish, and often
failed to go to completion even after 24 h. Under the preferred
conditions (25 mol % catalyst), the reaction was complete within
2 h. As little as 5 mol % was sufficient to drive the reaction to
completion, but a tailing in conversion was observed, and the
reaction required overnight reflux to consume the starting
materials. All of the copper(I) halide sources tried gave
equivalent results. Copper(0) or -(II) sources were not effective
in reversing the regioselectivity to a useful degree. Potassium
carbonate could also be used as the base, but a minimum of
two equivalents were required for good conversion.
There have been reports on the use of copper catalysis in
biaryl ether formation from halopyridines,12 but none that
address the issue of regioselectivity in 2,4-chloropyridines. The
beneficial effect of pyridine, either as a ligand or as solvent,
has been well-demonstrated in nonpyridyl Ullmann couplings,13
but this example appears to be unique, since the pyridine
appears to play a role even in the absence of copper. It is
possible that pyridine is adding to form a transient pyridinium
species, but literature precedent14 suggests that such activa-
tion would occur at C-4, and would be more likely to enhance
the electrophilicity of that carbon rather than block it. One
reaction was run in which collidine was substituted for
pyridine, and in that instance, almost no conversion was
observed after extensive reaction times. However, a trace of
a product was observed by GC that had a mass consistent
with displacement of one of the chlorides by collidine. If
the pyridinium adduct is forming, the role of the copper is
still not explained. Wright and co-workers have described
the isolation of macrocyclic 2-pyridyl copper complexes,15
which may help explain the directing effect noted in this
case, but would not explain the solvent effect. Finally, an
electron-transfer mechanism cannot be ruled out; the reac-
tions with copper(I) are highly colored and, as noted
previously, occur at a much faster rate than those without it.
The final step of the process was modified to avoid the use
of sodium hydride. Replacement with potassium tert-butoxide
gave clean displacement of the remaining chloride by 3-pen-
tanol, and the solvent was changed from DMSO to DMAc to
reduce potential handling issues. The order of addition and
temperature were found to have a large effect on the conversion.
The base had to be added to a mixture of the starting materials
at a minimum of 120 °C. Running the reaction at lower
temperatures or premixing all the reagents and heating gave
<60% conversion. A THF solution of the base was used to
avoid having to open the reactor under these conditions, with
continuous distillation of the THF from the reaction mixture to
maintain the temperature. The need for these conditions to
obtain good conversion is presumed to be due to steric
hindrance, since any residual methanol not removed after the
isolation of 4 gave the corresponding methoxy-substituted
product at much lower temperatures.
The reason for the changes in selectivity observed is not
entirely clear. There are a few examples reported in the literature
in which alkoxide anions add with high or exclusive selectivity
to the C-4 position of polychloropyridines. The best results are
obtained when the alkoxide is small and the reaction is carried
out at lower temperatures.5 Increasing the size of the nucleophile
tends to lead to mixtures of regioisomers,6 and this is usually
observed with phenols.7 More examples have been reported for
dichloroquinolines8 and other related heterocycles, 9 and in some
cases the regioselectivity can be controlled by reaction condi-
tions,10 but the kinetic selectivity is opposite to that observed
for the pyridines (C-2 > C-411), making it difficult to draw
analogies.
The optimized conditions are shown in Scheme 3. During
scale-up, a silica pad filtration was carried out after the first
coupling to ensure removal of the copper salts. The recovery
for both steps was less than the inherent yield because of the
very high solubility of both 4 and 1 in all solvents screened for
isolation.
In conclusion, a method for regioselective addition of mesitol
to the C-2 position of 2,4-dichloro-3,6-dimethylpyridine has
been described. The use of a copper(I) salt and pyridine as
solvent are key to achieving the desired selectivity.
(5) Tiwari, A.; Riordan, J. M.; Waud, W. R.; Struck, R. F. J. Med. Chem.
2002, 45, 1079.
(6) Brady, J. H.; Wakefield, B. J. Synthesis 1984, 33.
(7) Mack, A. G; Suschitzky, H.; Wakefield, B. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1980, 1682.
(8) Osborne, A. G.; Miller, L. A. D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993,
181.
(12) (a) Hill, A. J; McGraw, W. J. J. Org. Chem. 1949, 14, 783. (b)
Fujiwara, H.; Kitagawa, K. Heterocycles 2000, 53, 409.
(9) Chen, J.; Steglich, W. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1993, 30, 909.
(10) Jarvest, R. L.; Armstrong, S. A.; Berge, J. M.; Brown, P.; Elder, J. S.;
Brown, M. J.; Copley, R. C. B.; Forrest, A. K.; Hamprecht, D. W.;
O’Hanlon, P. J.; Mitchell, D. J.; Rittenhouse, S.; Witty, D. R. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3937.
(13) (a) Pello´n, R. F.; Carrasco, R.; Millia´n, V.; Rode´s, L. Synth. Commun.
1995, 25, 1077. (b) Fagan, P. J.; Hauptmann, E.; Shapiro, R.;
Casalnuovo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5043.
(14) Schmidt, A.; Mordhorst, T.; Nieger, M. Synthesis 2006, 23, 3987.
(15) Garcia, F.; Hopkins, A. D.; Kowenicki, R. A.; McPartlin, M.; Rogers,
M. C.; Wright, D. S. Organometallics 2004, 23, 3884.
(11) Rowlett, R. J., Jr.; Lutz, R. E J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1946, 68, 1288.
412
•
Vol. 12, No. 3, 2008 / Organic Process Research & Development