in a number of biologically active marine natural products,
such as brevetoxins A and B, yessotoxin, ciguatoxin,
laurencin, and maitotoxin.7 We have recently reported8 a new
synthesis of R-hydroxy-γ-alkylidenebutenolides by the first
regio- and stereoselective cyclizations of 1,3-dicarbonyl
dianion equivalents with oxalic acid dielectrophiles. Herein,
we wish to report an efficient synthesis of 5,n bicyclic
butenolides (n ) 7-9) which can be regarded as hybrids of
the pharmacologically relevant subunits of γ-alkylidene-
butenolides and medium-ring ethers.
Scheme 1
Our starting point was the reaction of the dianion of ethyl
acetoacetate with allyl bromide which afforded ethyl 3-oxo-
hept-6-enoate 1 in 82% yield. Unfortunately, all attempts to
directly prepare â-allyl-γ-alkylidenebutenolide 5 by using
our dianion methodology8a failed: reaction of dilithiated ethyl
3-oxoheptenoate 1 with N,N′-dimethoxy-N,N′-dimethyl-
ethanediamide resulted in a complex mixture. This can be
explained by the lability of the dianion of 1. Therefore, we
have envisaged a Lewis acid-catalyzed synthesis of buteno-
lide 5 via the 1,3-bis(trimethylsilyloxy)-1,3-butadiene 3
which represents an electroneutral dianion equivalent.9 Bis-
silyl enol ether 3 was efficiently prepared by formation of
the silyl enol ether 2 (using Me3SiCl/NEt3) in 96% yield
(Scheme 1). Deprotonation of 2 with LDA at -78 °C and
subsequent addition of Me3SiCl afforded diene 3 in 90%
yield. To our satisfaction, Me3SiOTf-catalyzed cyclization
of 3 with oxalyl chloride 4 afforded the γ-alkylidenebuteno-
lide 5 in 76% yield with very good regioselectivity and
Z-selectivity.
The chemoselective alkylation of the R-hydroxy group
proved problematic: reaction of 5 with allyl bromide in the
presence of K2CO3 afforded the desired allylated butenolide
6a, however, in only 22% yield. The low yield can be
explained by the general base lability of the Michael position
of γ-alkylidenebutenolides.6f The use of 2-bromo-3-butene
resulted in formation of an inseparable mixture of products,
presumably due to decomposition and competing SN/SN′
reactions. The problem could be eventually solved by the
use of the Mitsunobu reaction: treatment of 5 with allylic
alcohol, 2-hydroxy-3-butene, and 3-hydroxy-1-pentene in the
presence of PPh3/DEAD afforded the corresponding allylated
butenolides 6a-c in good yields with very good chemose-
lectivities.10 The chemoselective alkylation of γ-alkylidene-
butenolides has to our knowledge not been reported so far.11
To our satisfaction, the ring-closing metathesis (RCM)12 of
6a-c using the Grubbs catalyst 7 proceeded uneventfully
(7) For medium-ring ethers, see: (a) Altenbach, H.-J. In Organic
Synthesis Highlights; Mulzer, J., Altenbach, H.-J., Braun, M., Krohn, K.,
Reissig, H.-U., Ed.; VCH: Weinheim, 1991. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Hwang,
C.-K.; Marron, B. E.; DeFrees, S. A.; Couladouros, E. A.; Abe, Y.; Carroll,
P. J.; Snyder, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3040 and cited literature.
(c) Overman, L. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 358. (d) Brandes, A.;
Hoffmann, H. M. R. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 145. (e) Alvarez, E.; Diaz, M.
T.; Perez, R.; Ravelo, J. L.; Regueiro, A.; Vera, J. A.; Zurita, D.; Martin,
J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2848. (f) Robinson, R. A.; Clark, J. S.;
Holmes, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10400. (g) Paquette, L. A.;
Sweeney, T. J. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 4487.
(8) Langer, P.; Stoll, M. Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 1919; Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1803. (b) Langer, P.; Krummel, T. Chem. Commun. 2000,
967. (c) Langer, P.; Eckardt, T. Synlett 2000, 844.
(9) (a) Krohn, K.; Ostermeyer, H.-H.; Tolkiehn, K. Chem. Ber. 1979,
112, 2640-2649. (b) Chan, T.-H.; Brownbridge, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 3534. (c) Molander, G. A.; Cameron, K. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 830.
(10) Representative experimental procedure: To a degassed THF
solution (6 mL) of 5 (240 mg, 1.1 mmol), 3-hydroxy-1-pentene (114 mg,
1.32 mmol), and PPh3 (347 mg, 1.32 mmol) was added a THF solution (2
mL) of DEAD (0.205 mL, 1.32 mmol). The solution was stirred at 20 °C
for 14 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was purified
by chromatography (silica gel, ether: petroleum ether ) 1:3) to give 6c as
a light yellow oil (180 mg, 56%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 250 MHz): 0.95, 1.28
(2 × t, J ) 7 Hz, 2 × 3 H, 2 × CH3), 1.75 (m, 2 H, CHCH2), 3.10 (m, 2
H, CCH2CHdCH), 4.22 (q, J ) 7 Hz, 2 H, OCH2CH3), 5.00-5.40 (m, 5
H, CHCdO, 2 × CHdCH2), 5.60-5.90 (m, 2 H, CHdCH2).13C NMR
(CDCl3, 62.5 MHz): δC 9.15, 14.16, 26.50, 28.03, 60.69, 82.99, 96.86,
117.56, 119.05, 129.61, 132.18, 136.27, 144.60, 155.46, 162.49, 163.37.
MS (70 eV, EI): 292 (20, M+). Anal. Calcd for C16H20O5: C 65.74, H
6.90. Found: C 65.56, H 7.10. All new compounds were characterized
spectroscopically and gave correct elemental analyses and/or high-resolution
mass spectra.
(11) For Mitsunobu reactions of tetronic acid derivatives, see: Bajwa,
J. S.; Anderson, R. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 48, 6973.
2992
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 19, 2000