Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
6252
L. Begum et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 6249–6253
Scheme 7.
5. See for examples: Box, J. M.; Harwood, L. M.; Humph-
reys, J. L.; Morris, G. A.; Redon, P. M.; Whitehead, R. C.
Synlett 2002, 358–360.
6. For a review see; Ley, S. V.; Baeschlin, D. K.; Dixon, D.
J.; Foster, A. C.; Owen, D. R.; Ince, S. J.; Priepke, H. W.
M.; Reynolds, D. J. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 53–80.
7. Griffith, W. P.; Ley, S. V.; Whitcombe, G. P.; White, A. D.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 1625–1627.
8. Alves, C.; Barros, M. T.; Maycock, C. D.; Ventura, M. R.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8443–8456.
Scheme 8. Reagents and conditions: (i) LiOH, H2O, CH3OH, rt; (ii)
TFA–H2O (6:1), rt, 78% for 5, 54% for 6, 63% for 7.
9. (a) Saksena, A. K.; Mangiaracina, P. Tetrahedron Lett.
´
1983, 24, 273–276; (b) Armesto, N.; Ferrero, M.; Fernan-
dez, S.; Gotor, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8759–8762.
10. Typical experimental procedure for tandem dehydration/
fluorodeoxygenation. A solution of the diol (0.36mmol) in
CH2Cl2 (1mL) was added dropwise, under an atmosphere
of nitrogen, to an ice-cooled solution of dialkylaminosul-
furtrifluoride (0.8mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1mL). Once addition
was complete, the ice bath was removed and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5h. The
reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (10mL) and
then quenched by the careful addition of a saturated
aqueous solution of sodium bicarbonate (10mL). The
organic phase was collected and the aqueous phase was
most expedient syntheses of 5, 6 and 7 utilised the dual
dehydrating and fluorodeoxygenating properties of the
aminosulfurtrifluorides and were accomplished in six,
four and five steps, respectively. In the case of (3S)-3-
fluoroshikimic acid (6) a lengthier seven step synthesis
was found to be higher yielding overall but this was
not the case for the isomeric compound 5.
extracted with
a further three portions of CH2Cl2
Acknowledgements
(3·10mL). The combined organic extracts were dried
(MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash
column chromatography (SiO2; EtOAc–petroleum ether
(40–60), 1:10) provided the fluorinated products.
We acknowledge, with thanks, the EPSRC for funding
(L.B., J.L.H, D.J.L and H.L.W.) and we wish to
acknowledge the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry
Service Centre in Swansea for the provision of high res-
olution mass measurements. We thank the EPSRC and
the University of Reading for funds for the Image Plate
system. We are particularly grateful to Rehana Sung for
assistance with HPLC purification of compound 5, 6
and 7 and Dr. Julian Box for his contribution to initial
investigations into the synthesis of compound 6.
11. Spectroscopic data for compound 15b. Mp 107–109ꢂC;
22
½aꢂD +14.4 (c 10.5, CH2Cl2); mmax (film)/cmꢀ1 2992 m,
2952 m, 2916 m and 2834 m (C–H), 1725 s (C@O), 1650 w
(C@C); dH (400MHz; CDCl3) 1.33 and 1.40 (2·3H, 2·s,
2·butyl CH3), 2.35 (1H, dddd, J 18.1, 15.0, 10.2, 2.7 Hz,
C(6)Hb), 2.93 (1H, dtd, J 18.1, 6.2, 0.9 Hz, C(6)Ha), 3.29
and 3.30 (2·3H, 2·s, 2·acetal OCH3), 3.70 (1H, ddd, J
24.5, 11.1, 3.6 Hz, C(4)H), 3.79 (3H, s, CO2 CH3), 4.15
(1H, ꢁtd, J 10.7, 6.2 Hz, C(5)H), 5.10 (1H, ddd, J 50.1,
5.2, 3.6 Hz, C(3)HF), 6.90 (1H, ddd, J 5.2, 2.7, 2.2 Hz,
C(2)H); dC (75.4MHz; CDCl3) 17.98 and 18.08 (2·butyl
CH3), 30.67 (d, J 3.1 Hz, C(6)H2), 48.30 and 48.40
(2·acetal OCH3), 52.63 (CO2 CH3), 62.72 (C(5)H), 69.95
(d, J 17.0 Hz, C(4)H), 84.17 (d, J 175.5, C(3)HF), 99.48
and 100.38 (2·acetal C), 130.96 (d, J 13.5 Hz, C(2)H),
135.20 (d, J 9.8 Hz, C(1)), 166.38 (C@O); dF (376.3MHz;
CDCl3) ꢀ180.2 (ddddd, J 50.1, 24.5, 15.0, 6.2, 2.2 Hz,
C(3)HF); m/z (CI/NH3) 322 (MNHþ4 , 12%), 290 (82), 273
(88), 270 (30), 258 (30), 241 (30), 85 (100); (found
322.1669: C14H25FNO6 (MNHþ4 ) requires 322.1666).
12. A definitive mechanistic explanation for the formation of
16b is not possible, however it is plausible that the reaction
may procceed via an oxetane intermediate, which under-
goes nucleophilic ring opening at C1.
References and notes
1. (a) Begum, L.; Box, J. M.; Drew, M. G. B.; Harwood, L.
M.; Humphreys, J. L.; Lowes, D. J.; Morris, G. A.;
Redon, P. M.; Walker, F. M.; Whitehead, R. C. Tetra-
hedron 2003, 59, 4827–4841; (b) Humphreys, J. L.; Lowes,
D. J.; Wesson, K. A.; Whitehead, R. C. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 3429–3432.
2. (a) Brettle, R.; Cross, R.; Frederickson, M.; Haslam, E.;
MacBeath, F. S.; Davies, G. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1996, 6, 1275–1278; (b) Brettle, R.; Cross, R.; Frederick-
son, M.; Haslam, E.; MacBeath, F. S.; Davies, G. M.
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 10547–10556.
3. Jiang, S.; Singh, G.; Boam, D. J.; Coggins, J. R.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 4087–4090.
13. Lal, G. S.; Pez, G. P.; Pesaresi, R. J.; Prozonic, F. M.;
Cheng, H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7048–7054.
4. See for examples; (a) Card, P. J.; Reddy, G. S. J. Org.
Chem. 1983, 48, 4734–4743; (b) Weigert, F. J.; Shenvi, A.
J. Fluorine Chem. 1994, 66, 19–21.
14. Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for
structure 16a have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publica-