Stereodynamics of Triisopropyl(aryl)silanes
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 6, 2000 1735
Since, as mentioned above, 3a exchanges with 3b,
scrambling with 3a ′ and 3a ′′ may also follow the same
pathway. A single averaged signal can thus be obtained,
without ever visiting conformer 3c. Schemes 7 and 8 thus
explain how two single signals are observed at -149 °C
for the methine carbons.
barriers of 5.7, 6.6, and 6.7 kcal mol-1 for 3c, 3b, and
3a , respectively. The value for 3c is indeed almost equal
to that experimentally measured for the symmetric
conformer (5.9 kcal mol-1), and also the other two differ
by only 1 kcal mol-1 from that determined for the
asymmetric conformer (5.7 kcal mol-1). Naphthalene
rotation has its high energy point when one isopropyl
passes through the plane of the naphthalene at the peri-
position, and after examining a model of the starting
conformation, the reported barriers were calculated by
ensuring, quite reasonably, that the isopropyl group
rotates in concert, in the sense that keeps its methine
hydrogen, rather than a methyl group, near the peri-
hydrogen. The interconversion proposed in Scheme 8 is
readily modeled since it centers around the highly
symmetrical (g, g, g) conformation and only two torsion
angles change significantly. The barrier here is computed
to be 6.8 kcal mol-1 without naphthyl rotation and 6.6
kcal mol-1 with accompanying naphthyl rotation. If a
total view of all four rotors could be theoretically modeled,
the calculated barrier for such interconversion could only
be lower than 6.6 kcal mol-1, thus becoming even closer
Sch em e 8. P ossible P a th w a y for th e
In ter con ver sion of th e Th r ee Degen er a te F or m s
3b, 3b′, 3b′′ (∆Gq ) 5.7 k ca l m ol-1).
Th e Con for m er in Squ a r e Br a ck et Ha s Too High
a n En er gy To Be Ap p r ecia bly P op u la ted
3b, (g1, -g2, g3) f [(g1, g2, g3,] f (-g1, g2, g3), 3b′
3b′, (-g1, g2, g3) f [(g1, g2, g3,] f (g1, g2, -g3), 3b′′
Further support to this interpretation also comes form
the spectrum of the methyl groups. According to the
model of Scheme 7, when the three CH carbons of the
conformer 3c become equivalent, the corresponding six
methyl groups must also become equivalent. In fact each
isopropyl group in turn adopts the anti conformation, and
when this motion is rapid the methyls within each
isopropyl group become enantiotopic.
to the experimental values of 5.7 kcal mol-1
.
Isopropyl rotation, without concomitant naphthyl group
rotation, can be modeled straightforwardly. In the case
of the 3a into 3b interconversion mentioned above, a
simple rotation of one group achieves this smoothly with
a barrier of 4.8 kcal mol-1. The third dynamic process of
5.4 kcal mol-1 observed in the aromatic region might thus
be attributed to the slowing down of this process, which
would lead to separate signals of different intensities for
these conformers at -165 °C. This interpretation stems
from the fact that the observed barrier not only is lower
On the other hand the processes of Scheme 8, while
they make the methine carbons equivalent, still leave the
two methyls within any isopropyl group distinct, so that
two methyl signals are expected. This is because the local
plane of symmetry (i.e., the one bisecting the isopropyl
group) never coincides, even with fast rotation, with the
dynamic plane of symmetry of the molecule as a whole,
contrary to the case of 3c. The complex pattern of the
signals, due to nine overlapping methyl lines observed
at -165 °C, broaden and coalesce, at -149 °C, into three
lines, with an integrated intensity (checked by computer
simulation) of about 3:6:3 as shown in Figure 2. Thus
the intense central line (indicated by a triangle) corre-
sponds to the six equivalent methyl groups predicted by
the motion of Scheme 7 for the set of conformers 3c, 3c′,
3c′′. The two equally intense lines (indicated by squares)
each corresponds to three methyl groups, as predicted
by the motion of Scheme 8 for the set of conformers 3a
+ 3b (the line on the left of the major signal, being
sharper, appears taller than its equally intense broader
companion on the right). Only above -149 °C the inter-
conversion of 3c with the pair 3a + 3b becomes rapid
(having a barrier of 6.25 kcal mol-1) eventually leading
to a single line for the CH as well as for the CH3 carbons
(Figure 3).
Molecu la r Mech a n ics Ca lcu la tion s. MM3 calcula-
tions of bond rotations help to elucidate the conforma-
tional processes that give rise to the spectral changes of
compound 3. With four asymmetric rotors the possibili-
ties are very complex, but a few useful conclusions
emerge from these computations. Independent rotation
of the naphthyl group in 3 appears to have a barrier
much higher than any experimentally observed, the
lowest we could find being as high as 8.6 kcal mol-1 in
the case of conformer 3a . We were able, however, to
model a concerted rotation of the naphthyl and of one
isopropyl group from various conformational minima with
than the previous ones (i.e., 5.7, 5.9, and 6.25 kcal mol-1
)
but is also similar to the theoretically calculated value
(4.8 kcal mol-1) for the exchange of 3a with 3b. Any
alternative explanation would involve conformers calcu-
lated to be much less stable.
This interpretation also requires that the highest
barrier of 6.25 kcal mol-1 corresponds to the interchange
of the pair of conformers 3a + 3b with conformer 3c, with
the naphthyl group still rapidly rotating above -150 °C.
Accordingly, this same barrier of 6.25 kcal mol-1 should
be also obtained when monitoring the aromatic signals
in the same temperature range, because, in principle,
they too should display different shifts, even in the
presence of fast naphthyl rotation. On the other hand,
the highest barrier determined from the aromatic signals
could be detected only below -150 °C, and its value
turned out to be equal to the lowest of the barriers (5.7
kcal mol-1) determined from the aliphatic signals.17 This
apparent discrepancy is due to the fact that the shift
difference of the aromatic signals in conformer 3c and
in the set (3a + 3b) is initially quite small, being partly
averaged by the fast rotation of the naphthyl group. Only
when, on further cooling, the mentioned concerted pro-
cess renders the naphthyl rotation sufficiently slow does
the separation of some aromatic signals become large
(17) The aliphatic and aromatic spectral regions were simulta-
neously acquired at the same identical temperature. The differences
in the free energies of activation cannot be thus attributed to
differences in the determination of the relative temperatures. The only
uncertainities are those on the rate constants derived from the
theoretical fitting of the line shape which, given the quality of the
experimental spectra, was about (20%. Such uncertainity about the
rate constants leads to an error of (0.05 kcal mol-1 in the measurement
of the relative ∆Gq values at these temperatures.
(16) The degenerate forms are 3a ) (g1, -g2, a3), 3a ′ ) (a1, g2, -g3),
3a ′′ ) (-g1, a2, g3), and 3b ) (g1, -g2, g3), 3b′ ) (-g1, g2, g3), 3b′′ ) (g1,
g2, -g3). Of course also the enantiomers 3a * ) [-(g1), -(-g2), -(a3)]
and 3b* ) [-(g1), -(-g2), -(g3)] have three degenerate forms but in a
nonchiral medium this distinction is immaterial.