enantioselectvities of 81% (entry 7), 83% (entry 10) and 71% ee
entry 12), respectively. To the best of our knowledge, these are
the best results so far reported for this oxidative coupling of
In summary, we have designed novel chiral oxovanadium(IV)
(
complexes for the asymmetric catalytic oxidative coupling of
2-naphthols which results in high yields of 86–99%, and with
high enantioselectivities of 83–98% ee.
2
-naphthols. Catalyst 2c is the best reported system for the
catalytic asymmetric coupling of 2-naphthol.
We are grateful for financial support from the National
Science Foundation of China (20102005).
With comparably better chiral catalysts 2b and 2c in hand, we
extended their applications in catalysing the oxidative coupling
of other 2-naphthol derivatives 3b–d and results are shown in
Table 2. In all cases, catalyst 2c, on average, exhibited higher
enantioselectivity than 2b. For the 2-naphthol derivatives 3b–d
tested, the corresponding coupling products 4b–d were afforded
in 86–99% yields and with 83–98% ee. The best enantiose-
lectivity of 98% ee was obtained with 7,7A-dimethoxy-BINOL
Notes and references
‡ General procedure: a two-neck round bottom flask (5 mL) was charged
with a solution of catalyst 2c (16 mg, 0.02 mmol) in anhydrous CCl
The solution was stirred for 10 min under an oxygen atmosphere, and then
treated with a solution of 2-naphthol (29 mg, 0.2 mmol) in CCl (1 mL). The
reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C until the reaction was complete
monitored by TLC). The crude mixture was concentrated under reduced
4
(1 mL).
4
4
b (Table 2, entry 4) and is the best result among catalytic
(
asymmetric preparations of this type. Optically pure 4b is very
pressure and the residue purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate–
light petroleum (bp 60–90 °C) (1/3)) to give the desired compound.
useful for the preparation of some novel chiral ligands, such as
8
a multifunctional polymeric catalyst. 3,3A-Dimethoxy-BINOL
was not produced by oxidative coupling in the presence of either
1 (a) L. Pu, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 2405; (b) R. Noyori, Asymmetric
Catalysis in the Organic Synthesis, Wiley, New York, 1994; (c) R.
Noyori and H. Takaya, Acc. Chem. Res., 1990, 23, 345.
For resolution of binaphthols, see:(a) B. Feringa and H. Wynberg,
Bioorg. Chem., 1978, 7, 397; (b) F. Toda and K. Tanaka, J. Org. Chem.,
2
b or 2c. Substitution with a methoxy group at C3 suppressed
5b
the coupling reactivity.
2
1
988, 53, 3607; (c) S. Miyano, K. Kawahara, Y. Inoue and H. Hashimoto,
Table 2 Coupling reaction of 2-naphthol and derivatives using catalysts 2b
and 2c
a
Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 355; (d) W. H. Pirkle and J. L. Schreiner, J.
Org. Chem., 1981, 46, 4988; (e) Q. S. Hu, D. Vitharana and L. Pu,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1995, 6, 2123; (f) D. Cai, D. L. Hughes, T. R.
Verhoeven and P. J. Reider, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 35, 7991; for non-
oxidative methods of chiral binaphthyl synthesis, see; (g) T. Hayashi, K.
Hayashizaki, T. Kiyoi and Y. Ito, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 8153; (h)
M. Shindo, K. Koga and K. Tomioka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114,
8732; (i) A. N. Cammidge and K. V. L. Crepy, Chem. Commun., 2000,
1723; (j) J. Yin and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
12051.
3
(a) M. Nakajima, I. Miyoshi, K. Kanayama and S.-i. Hashimoto, J. Org.
Chem., 1999, 64, 2264; (b) X. Lin, J. Yang and M. C. Kozlowski, Org.
Lett., 2001, 3, 1137 and references therein.
4
5
R. Irie, K. Masutani and T. Katsuki, Synlett, 2000, 1433.
(a) C. Y. Chu, D. R. Hwang, S. K. Wang and B. J. Uang, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 980; (b) S. W. Hon, C. H. Li, J. H. Kuo, N. B. Barhate,
Y. H. Liu, Y. Wang and C. T. Chen, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 869.
For the studies on the helical polymeric salen complexes, see: (a) H. C.
Zhang, W. S. Huang and L. Pu, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 481; (b) Y. Dai,
T. J. Katz and D. A. Nichols, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35,
2109; for helical chiral Lewis acid, see; (c) K. Maruoka, N. Murase and
H. Yamamoto, J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 2938; for other chiral catalysts
based on peptides with secondary structures, see; (d) S. J. Miller, G. T.
Copeland, N. Papaioannou, T. E. Horstmann and E. M. Ruel, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 1629; (e) S. R. Gilbertson, S. E. Collibee and A.
Agarkov, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 6522.
Entry
Catalyst
Product
Time/days Yield (%)b Ee (%)c
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
2b
2c
2b
2c
2b
2c
2b
2c
4a
4a
4b
4b
4c
4c
4d
4d
8
6
5
5
5
5
7
7
86
95
85
88
98
99
trace
trace
81
83
97
98
87
88
ND
ND
7 (a) L. J. Theriot, G. O. Carlisle and H. J. Hu, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1969,
31, 2841; (b) J. J. R. Frausto da Silva, R. Wootton and R. D. Gillard, J.
Chem. Soc. A, 1970, 3369.
The reaction was carried out at 0 °C in the presence of 10 mol% catalyst
b
c
using CCl
4
as solvent. Isolated yield. The ee values were determined by
HPLC on a Kromasil CHI-TBB column.
8
H. B. Yu, Q. S. Hu and L. Pu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 6500.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 914–915
915
Typeset and printed by Black Bear Press Limited, Cambridge, England