Scheme 1. Mild Conversion of Aldehyde 1 into Cyanide 2
without Protection of the Ketone Present in 1
Table 1. One-Carbon Homologation of Simple and Hindered
Aldehydes
purification and two reaction vessels and proceeded in an
overall yield of 83%. Herein we report the generality and
scope of this versatile and selective one-pot homologation
for hindered aldehydes in the presence and absence of
ketones as well as a proposed mechanism for the unusual
ketone regeneration observed.
We first set out to investigate the generality of this protocol
with simple aldehydes in order to optimize the overall process
(Table 1). In all cases, the reactions proceeded as efficiently
and easily as for substrate 1 with overall yields ranging from
70 to 99%.
Table 2 illustrates the versatility of this approach with a
number of complex and sterically hindered keto-aldehydes.
Overall yields are generally good to excellent for the entire
procedure (aldehyde f cyanide). The first step is extremely
mild since the presence of Michael acceptors (entries 3 and
4, Table 1; entries 1, 2, and 6,8 Table 2), base-labile (entries
1 and 2, Table 2) and even acid-sensitive (entries 3, 4, 7,
Table 1, entries 1-3, Table 2) groups did not influence (bis)-
cyanohydrin formation. Even in the case of the extremely
hindered aldehyde in entry 7 (Table 2), the reaction succeeds
furnishing 80% overall yield of the desired cyanide. Sub-
strates containing easily enolizable carbonyl groups showed
no epimerization under the reaction conditions (Table 1,
entries 3, 4, and 7; Table 2, entries 1-3, 5, and 6). This
strategy saves a number of steps since alternative routes
based on protecting group chemistry are lengthy and lower-
yielding. Intrigued by the facile and simultaneous deprotec-
tion of ketone-cyanohydrins in this neutral reaction, we set
out to determine the root of this unusual phenomenon (see
a Preparation of aldehydes in entries 1-7 will be presented in the full
account of this work. b Isolated yield over entire homologation sequence.
c Yield based on 11% recovered aldehyde.
Scheme 2). After a systematic elimination of the possible
causes for this transformation,9 we suspected that imidazole,
produced after deoxygenation,7 was responsible. Although
the deoxygenation/ketone regeneration of 4 (derived from
(12) General Experimental Procedure. All compounds reported were
fully characterized spectroscopically. To a 0.8 M solution of keto-aldehyde
(i.e., Table 2) in toluene was added 2.2 equiv of Et2AlCN (1 M solution in
toluene, Aldrich) at 0 °C. After approximately 10 min the reaction mixture
was diluted with EtOAc and Rochelle’s salt (saturated solution) was added.
After stirring for 30 min at ambient temperature, the mixture was separated
and the organic layer was washed sequentially with water and brine, dried
(MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo to furnish the bis-cyanohydrin in 90%
purity. Only 1-2 equiv of Et2AlCN is necessary for simple aldehydes (i.e.,
Table 1). To a degassed (Ar bubbling, 10 min) solution of (bis)cyanohydrin
in CH2Cl2 (distilled from CaH2) were added 0.2 equiv of 4-DMAP and
1.1-1.2 equiv of 1,1′-thiocarbonyldiimidazole. Upon formation of the
thioimidazolide (as monitored by TLC, usually 5-30 min), nBu3SnH (5.0
equiv), and AIBN (0.2 equiv) were added, and the reaction vessel was placed
in a 20 °C water bath while exposed to light from a nearby sunlamp (simple
floodlamp) for 5-20 min (TLC monitoring). The reaction mixture was
diluted (10:1 hexanes:EtOAc) and passed through a silica plug to remove
tin impurities, and the product was eluted with hexanes:EtOAc (1:1). Flash
column chromatography was employed to obtain spectroscopically pure
material.
(8) 1 equiv of Et2AlCN was used to avoid Michael addition.
(9) Using the cyanohydrin of cyclohexanone (8), the following control
experiments were performed: (a) 8 + AIBN; (b) 8 + nBu3SnH; (c) 8 +
nBu3SnH + AIBN; (d) 8 + nBu3SnH + AIBN + hν; (e) experiment d
followed by silica gel chromatography; (f) 8 + 4-DMAP or imidazole.
Experiments a-e led to no reaction and full recovery of 8. Experiment f
led to ca. 20% conversion to cyclohexanone after 12 h.
(10) Prepared as reported in Japanese Patent application JP 79-38934
(Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., Japan), see also: Chem. Abstr. 94, 139812.
(11) Nicolaou, K. C.; Vourloumis, D.; Winssinger, N.; Baran, P. S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 44.
1896
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 13, 2000