Crystal Growth & Design
Article
Scheme 1. Synthesis Diagrams for 1−3
The secondary building units (SBUs) of Mn-MOFs were
changed from the paddle-wheel unit (1) to the dinuclear Mn
node with more potential metal sites (2) via adjusting anions
of manganese salts. The two-fold interpenetrating conforma-
tions of 1 and 2 were further modified into the non-
interpenetrating conformation of 3 by adjusting the mixed
solvent systems. Along with the structural modification, the
stability, activity, and reusability of the Mn-MOFs were
significantly improved in the solvent-free cycloaddition of
obtained. Yield: ca. 33.78% (based on H
2
L). Anal. Calcd. (%) for
C H MnN O (1): C 55.82, H 4.96, N 7.66; found: C 54.98, H
34 36
4
11
4
.65, N 7.06; After drying in a vacuum, Anal. Calcd. (%) for
C H MnN O : C 55.75, H 3.29, N 4.9; found: C 56.09, H 3.45, N
2
6
18
2
9
5
.28.
Synthesis of [Mn (L) (H O) ]·2DMA (2). H L (0.2 mmol, 0.0972
2
2
2
3
2
g) and MnCl ·4H O (0.1 mmol, 0.0198 g) were dissolved in 4 mL of
2
2
N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) and 2 mL of n-octanol, then sealed in
a 20 mL screw-capped vial, and heated in an oven under 110 °C for 3
days. Then the mixture was washed three times by methanol and
dried at room temperature. Finally, colorless block crystals were
CO under the mild conditions of atmospheric pressure and 70
2
°C. Especially, the amount of cocatalyst was significantly
obtained. Yield: ca. 31.32% (based on H
2
L). Anal. Calcd. (%) for
C H Mn N O (2): C 55.14, H 4.32, N 6.43; found: C 54.59, H
reduced, and the conversion of cyclohexene oxide was
dramatically increased over the other known heterogeneous
catalysts.
60 56
2
6
21
4
.70, N 6.02; After drying in a vacuum, Anal. Calcd. (%) for
C H Mn N O : C 55.75, H 3.29, N 4.97; found: C 55.71, H 3.32,
5
2
38
2
4
19
N 5.01.
Synthesis of [Mn (L) (DMF) (H O)]·3DMF (3). H L (0.3 mmol,
2
2
2
2
2
2
. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
0.1458 g) and MnCl ·4H O (0.2 mmol, 0.0396 g) were dissolved in 2
2 2
mL of acetonitrile and 4 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), then
added into a 20 mL screw-capped vial, and heated in an oven under
Materials and Methods. All the reagents were procured from a
reagent company and were used directly without further purification.
IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Alpha spectrometer. Elemental
analyses were carried out on an Elementar vario EL CUBE
instrument. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was carried out using
an Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer. Thermal analysis was carried out
using a NETZSCH TG 209F3 device. Gas chromatography was
carried out using a GC 7900 instrument.
1
10 °C for 3 days. Then the mixture was washed three times by
methanol and dried at room temperature. Finally, colorless block
crystals were obtained. Yield: ca. 35.76% (based on H L). Anal. Calcd.
2
(
%) for C H Mn N O (3): C 55.04, H 4.72, N 8.62. found: C
67 69 2 9 22
5
4.91, H 4.68, N 8.16. After drying in a vacuum, Anal. Calcd. (%) for
C H Mn N O : C 56.04, H 3.87, N 6.76; found: C 55.03, H 3.94,
58 48
2
6
19
N 5.97.
Synthesis of H L. The ligand H L was synthesized by a modified
2
2
28
Crystallographic Data Collection and Refinement. The data
collections of 1 and 3 were performed on a SuperNova, single source
at offset/far, Eos diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo-
Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) with a CCD detector. The data of MOF
2 were collected on a XtaLAB Synergy diffractometer using Cu-Kα
radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å) with an Hypix6000HE detector. The
obtained diffraction data were reduced by the program suite
CrysAlispro (Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, CrysAlisPro Software system,
Rigaku Corporation, Oxford, UK, 2019). The structure determination
was operated in the OLEX2 graphical user interface. The structures
were solved using the SHELXT program using Intrinsic Phasing and
refined using the SHELXL refinement package with Least Squares
procedure. The mixture of 4-aminobenzoic acid (20 mmol, 2.74 g)
and bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-7-ene-2,3,5,6-tetracarboxylic acid dianhydride
(10 mmol, 2.48 g) was added into a 250 mL round-bottom flask and
then 100 mL of acetic acid was poured into the flask and refluxed at
1
20 °C for 12 h. Then the mixture was removed from heat, cooled to
room temperature, washed three times by distilled water, and dried in
a vacuum at 100 °C. Finally, a white powder product was obtained
(
yield 92.8%, m.p. > 310 °C). H L was used for next procedures
2
without further purification. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C H O N (H L):
2
6
18
8
2
2
C 63.85, H 4.02, N 5.78; found: C 64.20, H 3.73, N 5.76.
Synthesis of [Mn(L)(H O)]·2DMA (1). H L (0.2 mmol, 0.0972 g)
2
2
and Mn(OAc) ·4H O (0.1 mmol, 0.0245 g) were dissolved in 4 mL
2
2
29−31
of N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) and 2 mL of n-octanol, then
minimization.
All the thermal parameters of non-hydrogen atoms
sealed in a 20 mL screw-capped vial, and heated in an oven under 110
were refined anisotropically. The H atoms of H O were generated
2
°
C for 3 days. Then the mixture was washed three times by methanol
and dried at room temperature. Finally, colorless block crystals were
from different maps and refined with isotropic temperature factors.
The H atoms of ligands were located geometrically. The unresolved
3
729
Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 3728−3735