C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
are consistent with every photon initiating the ring-opening reaction
of no more than 4-8 molecules (i.e., 3.30 molecules per photon in
this case). It should be noted that the reaction is exothermic by
∼10 kcal/mol, and that each mole of 300 nm photons injects ∼75
kcal/mol into the sample. A large fraction of this energy may lead
to the vaporization of H2O, which requires the cleavage of several
hydrogen bonds, and to the recrystallization of the product. To test
this hypothesis, we investigated the photochemistry of solvent-free
crystals grown from dry benzene.18 While the reaction was also
fast at ambient temperature, the samples melted and recrystallized
in situ.13 It was also of interest to see whether suspended
nanocrystals of the hydrate have a mechanical response that is
similar to that of macroscopic specimens.19 Indeed, using dynamic
light scattering, we found that the average crystal size changed from
1000 nm before reaction to 220 nm at 100% conversion.
Figure 1. Two micrograph frames illustrating the conversion of crystalline
DPCP to powder DPA. For a series of frames illustrating the entire
transformation into a fine powder within 15 min.12
In conclusion, the release of ring strain upon R-cleavage is a
viable strategy to engineer decarbonylation reactions in crystals.
With quantum yield values of ΦDPCP ) 3.30 ( 0.35, our results
indicate that DPCP undergoes an efficient quantum chain reaction
in the crystalline state. Given that the product is a highly emissive
chromophore, this remarkable reaction may be used to design
strategies for signal amplification.
Figure 2. Representative plot of conversion versus time for a suspension
with equimolar DPCP and DCK in H2O/CTAB. The 50-fold difference in
reactivity is due to a ca. 3.4 times greater absorbance by DPCP, and a 16-
fold difference in quantum yield (ΦDCK ) 0.2 and ΦDPCP ) 3.30 ( 0.35).
Acknowledgment. Financial support by the National Science
Foundation (Grants DMR0605688 and CHE0551938) is gratefully
acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available: Photochemical procedures,
reaction data, and fluorescence spectra. This material is available free
References
(1) (a) Ramamurthy, V.; Venkatesan, K. Chem. ReV. 1987, 87, 433. (b)
Sakamoto, M. Chem.sEur. J. 1997, 3, 684. (c) Scheffer, J. R.; Garcia-
Garibay, M. A.; Nalamasu, O. Org. Photochem. 1987, 8, 249.
(2) Schmidt, G. J. M. Pure Appl. Chem. 1971, 27, 647.
(3) Campos, L. M.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. In ReViews of ReactiVe Intermediate
Chemistry; Platz, M. S., Jones, M., Moss, R., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons:
Hoboken, NJ, 2007.
(4) Campos, L. M.; Ng, D.; Yang, Z.; Dang, H.; Martinez, H. L.; Garcia-
Garibay, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3749.
(5) Quenching also plays a role in solid-state photochemistry. (a) Ng, D.;
Yang, Z.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2001, 42, 9113. (b)
Ng, D.; Yang, Z.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7063.
(6) Ng, D.; Yang, Z.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 645.
(7) Natarajan, A.; Ng, D.; Yang, Z.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6485.
(8) DPCP is highly immunogenic and should be handled with gloves.
(9) (a) Takeuchi, S.; Tahara, T. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 4768. (b) Terazima,
M.; Hara, T.; Hirota, N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 246, 577. (c) Hirata, Y.;
Okada, T.; Mataga, N.; Nomoto, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 6559. (d)
Hirata, Y.; Mataga, N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 193, 287.
(10) Poloukhtine, A.; Popik, V. V. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 1749.
(11) Very efficient quantum chain reactions may occur in electron-transfer
reactions of ground-state radical ions: Gillmore, J. G.; Neiser, J. D.;
McManus, K.; Roh, Y.; Dombrowski, G. W.; Brown, T. G.; Dinnocenzo,
J. P.; Farid, S.; Robello, D. R. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 7684-7694.
(12) Tsukada, H.; Shimanouchi, H.; Sasada, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 27,
2455.
(13) Time-lapse micro-photographs of hydrated and anhydrous crystals irradi-
ated in situ have been deposited as Supporting Information.
(14) Veerman, M.; Resendiz, M. J. E.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 2615.
(15) Kasai, H.; Nalwa, H. S.; Oikawa, H.; Okada, S.; Matsuda, H.; Minami,
N.; Kakuta, A.; Ono, K.; Mukoh, A.; Nakanishi, H. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
1992, 31, 1132.
(16) By comparing suspended crystals with an optically dense solution of
DPCP, we confirmed that irradiation to S1 (λ g 335 nm) gives similar
quantum yields (ΦDPCP ≈ 1.0), as expected for a reaction from S1.
(17) Powel, R. C; Soos, Z. G. J. Lumin. 1975, 11, 1.
(18) Tsukada, H.; Shimanouchi, H.; Sasada, Y. Chem. Lett. 1974, 639.
(19) (a) Kobatake, S.; Takami, S.; Muto, H.; Ishikawa, T.; Irie, M. Nature
2007, 446, 778. (b) Al-Kaysi, R. O.; Mu¨ller, A. M.; Bardeen, C. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15938.
Figure 3. Fluorescence excitation (heavy line) and emission (dotted line)
of (top) a nanocrystalline suspension of DPA with submicellar CTAB/H2O
and (bottom) a micellar solution of DPA in CTAB/H2O.
experiments, taking into account the different absorbances (A) of
DPCP and DCK, and using the formula
ΦDPCP ) (ADPCP/ADCK)(NDPA/NDC)ΦDCK
we obtained ΦDPCP ) 3.30 ( 0.35.16 Incidental evidence that no
reaction takes place in solution or in micelles was obtained by
fluorescence analysis. While DPCP is not emissive, the fluorescence
emission of DPA formed in solid suspensions was nearly identical
to that obtained from a bulk solid, which is readily distinguishable
from that obtained from experiments carried out in solution or in
micelles (Figure 3).
A quantum yield greater than 1.0 is consistent with an adiabatic
barrierless reaction involving a species capable of transferring
energy to the ground-state reactant before deactivation. While there
is some disagreement on the series of events leading to the ground
state,9,10 femtosecond excitation of DPCP to S2 in solution leads to
ring opening within ca. 200 fs to give an excited-state species with
a lifetime of ca. 8 ps before relaxing to S1. Given that singlet
excitons in crystals have hopping times of ca. 1-2 ps,17 our results
JA078301X
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 4, 2008 1141