for (S)-Val (4), producing soluble PpiB at concentrations
similar to those formed when (S)-Val (4) is added. Native
PpiB contains 16 (S)-Val (4) residues, and the dominant peaks
in the spectra of protein obtained using 2, 0.2 and 0.02 mM of
the chloride 1a, correlate with the replacement of all 16, 13–14,
and 9 of these, respectively. The corresponding values for the
chloride 1b are 7–9, 5–7, and 3–5. At 2 mM concentration, the
chlorides 1a,b show average levels of incorporation of well
above 90% and around 50%, respectively. The PpiB produced
in the former case is around 30% comprised of protein in
which every one of its 16 residues of (S)-Val (4) is replaced by
the chloride 1a.
Notes and references
1 I. Hirao, T. Kanamori and T. Ueda, in Protein Engineering,
ed. C. Kohrer and U. L. RajBhandary, Nucleic Acids and Mole-
¨
cular Biology, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 2009, vol. 22, pp. 271–290.
´
2 (a) T. L. Hendrickson, V. de Crecy-Lagard and P. Schimmel, Annu.
Rev. Biochem., 2004, 73, 147–176; (b) S. Lepthien, L. Merkel and
N. Budisa, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5446–5450.
3 (a) P. M. England, Biochemistry, 2004, 43, 11623–11629; (b) J. Xie
and P. G. Schultz, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2006, 7, 775–782;
(c) K. J. Rodgers and N. Shiozawa, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.,
2008, 40, 1452–1466.
4 (a) A. S. Spirin, V. I. Baranov, L. A. Ryabova, S. Y. Ovodov and
Y. B. Alakhov, Science, 1988, 242, 1162–1164; (b) T. Kigawa,
T. Yabuki, Y. Yoshida, M. Tsutsui, Y. Ito, T. Shibata and
S. Yokoyama, FEBS Lett., 1999, 442, 15–19; (c) A. S. Spirin,
Trends Biotechnol., 2004, 22, 538–545; (d) Y. Shimizu, Y. Kuruma,
B.-W. Ying, S. Umekage and T. Ueda, FEBS J., 2006, 273,
4133–4140.
The chloride 1b is incorporated less efficiently than the
diastereomer 1a. In this context it is noteworthy that
(2S,3R)-Thr is adenylated by the ValRS of E. coli ML30,
but (2S,3S)-allo-Thr is not.16 In this first step of incorporation,
an OH group is accommodated in place of one Me substituent
of (S)-Val (4) but not the other. The pattern of incorporation
of the chlorides 1a,b parallels that for adenylation of
(2S,3R)-Thr and (2S,3S)-allo-Thr, with the Cl being preferen-
tially accommodated in place of the Me that may be
substituted for OH. The competitive experiment using the
chloride 1a (2.0 mM) and (S)-Val (4) (0.5 mM) shows an
average degree of substitution of around 30% (5 of a possible
16, Fig. 2c), indicating that the overall efficiency of incorpora-
tion of the chloride 1a is B8% (2.0/0.5 mM ꢀ 30%) that of
(S)-Val (4). In one regard this value is not surprising as it
is not too dissimilar to the relative efficiency of adenylation
by ValRS (30%),16 but it is nevertheless remarkable because
in direct contrast to the situation with (2S,3R)-Thr and
(S)-Abu for example, the chloride 1a survives editing post-
adenylation. Apparently the proof-reading sieve of ValRS18
accommodates the HOCHMe and CH2Me side chains
of (2S,3R)-Thr and (S)-Abu, respectively, but excludes the
MeCHMe and ClCHMe groups of (S)-Val (4) and the
chloride 1a.
5 (a) B. Holzberger, M. Rubini, H. M. Moller and A. Marx, Angew.
¨
Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 1324–1327; (b) J. K. Montclare, S. Son,
G. A. Clark, K. Kumar and D. A. Tirrell, ChemBioChem, 2009, 10,
84–86.
6 M. L. Mock, T. Michon, J. C. M. van Hest and D. A. Tirrell,
ChemBioChem, 2006, 7, 83–87.
7 K. Ozawa, M. J. Headlam, P. M. Schaeffer, B. R. Henderson,
N. E. Dixon and G. Otting, Eur. J. Biochem., 2004, 271,
4084–4093.
8 (a) K. Ozawa, P. S. C. Wu, N. E. Dixon and G. Otting, FEBS J.,
2006, 273, 4154–4159; (b) Y. Xun, P. Tremouilhac, C. Carraher,
C. Gelhaus, K. Ozawa, G. Otting, N. E. Dixon, M. Leippe,
J. Grotzinger, A. J. Dingley and A. V. Kralicek, Protein Expression
¨
Purif., 2009, 68, 22–27.
9 K. Ozawa, M. J. Headlam, D. Mouradov, S. J. Watt, J. L. Beck,
K. J. Rodgers, R. T. Dean, T. Huber, G. Otting and N. E. Dixon,
FEBS J., 2005, 272, 3162–3171.
10 (a) T. Kigawa, E. Yamaguchi-Nunokawa, K. Kodama,
T. Matsuda, T. Yabuki, N. Matsuda, R. Ishitani, O. Nureki and
S. Yokoyama, J. Struct. Funct. Genomics, 2002, 2, 29–35;
(b) V. Bergo, S. Mamaev, J. Olejnik and K. J. Rothschild, Biophys.
J., 2003, 84, 960–966.
11 Z. I. Watts and C. J. Easton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
11323–11325.
12 A. Bondi, J. Phys. Chem., 1964, 68, 441–451.
13 A. A. Bondi, Physical Properties of Molecular Crystals, Liquids and
Glasses, Wiley, New York, 1968.
In conclusion, the chlorides 1a,b–2a,b are efficiently
incorporated into PpiB as substitutes for (S)-Val (4) and
(S)-Leu (5), respectively, but the chlorides 3a,b do not
substitute for (2S,3S)-Ile (6). In preliminary studies we have
also observed a virtually identical pattern of incorporation
into ubiquitin. These results are of intrinsic interest, especially
since protein with high levels of incorporation of chlorinated
amino acids seems to be soluble and natively folded, and
they also provide a way to obtain novel proteins that
may have interesting properties. Conversely, it is remarkable
in this regard, that PpiB formed using the chloride 1a (2 mM),
and incorporating more than 90% of that amino acid
residue in place of (S)-Val (4), catalyses the interconversion
of the cis- and trans-amide isomers of N-succinyl-(S)-Ala-(S)-
Ala-(S)-Pro-(S)-Phe-4-nitroanilide with an activity similar to
that of native PpiB. The KM and kcat values of the native PpiB
14 (a) W. F. Prouty, J. Virol., 1975, 16, 1090–1093; (b) J. D. Etlinger
and A. L. Goldberg, J. Biol. Chem., 1980, 255, 4563–4568;
(c) K. W. Lanks, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj., 1990, 1034,
62–66.
15 (a) M. Rabinovitz and H. McGrath, J. Biol. Chem., 1959, 234,
2091–2095; (b) M. Rabinovitz and J. M. Fisher, Biochim. Biophys.
Acta, 1962, 61, 644–646; (c) M. Rabinovitz and J. M. Fisher,
Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1964, 91, 313–322.
16 F. H. Bergmann, P. Berg and M. Dieckmann, J. Biol. Chem., 1961,
236, 1735–1740.
17 The chloride 1a and (2S,3R)-Thr are structurally analogous, except
for the substitution of OH for Cl, which changes the order of
priority of the substituents at the 2-position when assigning
stereochemistry.
18 S. Fukai, O. Nureki, S.-i. Sekine, A. Shimada, J. Tao,
D. G. Vassylyev and S. Yokoyama, Cell, 2000, 103, 793–803.
19 S. Narayanan, M. R. S. Iyengar, P. L. Ganju, S. Rengaraju,
T. Shomura, T. Tsuruoka, S. Inouye and T. Niida, J. Antibiot.,
1980, 33, 1249–1255.
20 (a) L. Guignard, K. Ozawa, S. E. Pursglove, G. Otting and
159–162;
were determined to be 380 ꢁ 25 mM and 1940 ꢁ 60 sꢂ1
,
N.
E.
Dixon,
FEBS
Lett.,
2002,
524,
(b) M. A. Apponyi, K. Ozawa, N. E. Dixon and G. Otting, in
Structural Proteomics: High Throughput Methods, ed. B. Kobe,
M. Guss and T. Huber, Methods in Molecular Biology, Humana
Press, Totowa, NJ, 2008, vol. 426, pp. 257–268.
respectively, while the corresponding values for the
chlorinated protein are 590 ꢁ 50 mM and 1110 ꢁ 50 sꢂ1, a
less than two-fold difference in each (see ESI).
21 (a) O. Nureki, D. G. Vassylyev, M. Tateno, A. Shimada,
T. Nakama, S. Fukai, M. Konno, T. L. Hendrickson,
P. Schimmel and S. Yokoyama, Science, 1998, 280, 578–582;
(b) A. R. Fersht, Science, 1998, 280, 541.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support received from
the Australian Research Council, and assistance of Mai-Loan
Huynh with mass spectral analysis.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 1839–1841 1841