240
Clin. Cardiol. Vol. 25, May 2002
active and therefore less vulnerable to established trigger fac-
tors such as vigorous physical exertion and sexual activity. In
fact, a higher percentage of these patients admitted to de-
creased physical activity because of poor health.
Third, for the purposes of the present analysis, we have as-
sumed that the onset of symptoms of AMI is synonymous
with the onset of the event. In certain individuals, such as
those with a stuttering onset or those with prolonged episodes
of pre- or postinfarction angina, the actual initiation of myo-
cardial necrosis may be difficult to determine without hourly
serum enzyme determinations. Similarly, symptoms may be
an unreliable indicator in patients with altered pain percep-
tion, such as diabetics and the very elderly. However, these
limitations would apply similarly to both groups so that any
systematic bias is unlikely. Finally, practice patterns change;
for example, it is likely that a higher percentage of patients are
prescribed beta blockers and aspirin following AMI now than
was true 10 years ago. Accordingly, the applicability of our
data to present day practice may be limited.
This hypothesis is supported by a study of Pell and D’Alon-
zo, who examined the clinical and epidemiologic aspects of
AMI in 1,356 employed patients between 25 and 64 years of
age.18 They found that younger men were almost three times
more likely to be engaged in heavy activity or severe exertion at
the time of symptom onset than their older co-workers. Sim-
ilarly, French and Dock, and also Yater et al. describe a much
lower incidence of AMI occurring during sleep (10 and 13.1%,
respectively) in populations that were considerably younger
than ours.14, 15 In contrast, Ridker et al. found that 26.3% of pa-
tients were awakened by the symptoms of AMI (compared
with 26.2% in our study) in the population of the Physicians
Health Study, which was 20–30 years older than in the two
studies described above.19 Stewart et al. recently reported the
results of a study based upon a standardized questionnaire in
2,468 consecutive patients admitted to a coronary care unit
with a first myocardial infarction between 1975 and 1993.9
They found that patients with exercise-related symptom onset
were more likely to be younger and male, while those who had
onset of symptoms in bed were more likely to be older and
have a history of stable or unstable angina. The study did not
distinguish between those individuals who were asleep at the
time of symptom onset and those who were merely in bed (per-
haps, in some cases, because they were feeling ill).
Conclusions
Patients who are awakened from sleep by the symptoms of
acute myocardial infarction appear to be older and sicker than
individuals who develop symptoms during activity. These data
suggest that these former individuals may be less likely to be
exposed to recognized trigger factors such as heavy exertion or
sexual activity. Further studies are warranted to attempt to
identify factors that are likely to precipitate acute myocardial
infarction in individuals who are largely sedentary.
References
Limitations
1. Muller JE, Stone PH, Turi ZG, Rutherford JD, Czeisler CA, Parker
C, Poole WK, Pasamani E, Roberts R, Robertson T, Sobel BE,
Willerson JT, Braunwald E, and the MILIS Study Group: Circadian
variation in the frequency of onset of acute myocardial infarction.
N Engl J Med 1985;313:1315–1322
2. Goldberg RJ, Brady P, Muller JE, Chen Z, deGroot M, Zonnevald
P, Dalen JE: Time of onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarc-
tion. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:140–144
3. Hjalmarson A, Gilpin EA, Nicod P, Dittrich H, Henning H, Engler
R, Blacky R, Smith SC, Ricou F, Ross J Jr: Differing circadian pat-
terns of symptom onset in subgroups of patients with acute my-
ocardial infarction. Circulation 1989;80:267–275
4. Willich SN, Linderer T, Wegscheider K, Leizorovicz A, Alamerc-
ery I, Schroder R, and the ISAM Study Group: Increased morning
incidence of myocardial infarction in the ISAM study: Absence
with prior beta-adrenergic blockade. Circulation 1989;80:853–858
5. Tofler GH, Brezinski D, Schafer AI, Czeisler CA, Rutherford JD,
Willich SN, Gleason RE, Williams GH, Muller JE: Morning in-
crease in platelet response to ADP and epinephrine: Association
with the time of increased risk of acute myocardial infarction and
sudden cardiac death. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1514–1518
6. Brezinski DA, Tofler GH, Muller JE, Pohjola-Sintonen S, Willich
SN, Schafer AI, Czeisler CA, Williams GH: Morning increase in
platelet aggregability: Association with assumption of the upright
posture. Circulation 1988;78:35–40
7. Peters RW, Zoble RG, Liebson PR, Pawitan Y, Brooks MM, Pro-
schan M: Identification of a secondary peak in myocardial infarc-
tion onset 11 to 12 hours after awakening: The Cardiac Arrhythmia
Suppression Trial (CAST) experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;
22:998–1003
8. Goldberg RJ, Brady P, Muller JE, Chen Z, de Groot M, Zonneveld
P, Dalen JE: Time of onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarc-
tion. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:140–144
Our data should be interpreted in light of several method-
ologic limitations. Although our hypothesis was defined pro-
spectively, prior to data analysis, the information was obtained
at the time of the baseline examination, which may have oc-
curred as long as 2 years after the qualifying myocardial in-
farction. Thus, the data exclude patients who died from the
acute infarct (or from other causes) and may be applicable
only to a select population of survivors. In addition, this time
differential raises the possibility that our findings could be
partly due to biased recall. However, when we analyzed the
percentage of patients awakened by symptoms as a function
of the time interval between their index myocardial infarction
and their CAST baseline examination, we found no signifi-
cant differences between groups ( i.e., there was no significant
difference among those patients examined within 14 days of
their myocardial infarction, 15–28 days, 29–42 days, 43–90
days, etc.). Second, we have no information about the type of
medication that individuals were receiving at the time of the
acute event. Some of these medications, such as beta blockers
or salicylates, may have some effect upon trigger factors of
AMI and may have affected our findings. However, only 30%
of patients were receiving beta blockers (and a smaller per-
centage were receiving salicylates on a regular basis) at the
time of their baseline examination,16 and it is likely that an
even smaller percentage of individuals were receiving these
medications prior to their qualifying myocardial infarction.