C. Q. Meng et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 903±905
905
5-HT1B receptors were gained, but the 5-HT1D/5-HT1B
selectivity decreased (compare 9k with 9f).
Table 1. Binding pro®le of 5-Thienyltryptamine derivatives 9 in
comparison with sumatriptan at the cloned human 5-HT1D and 5-
HT1B receptors
In summary, we have discovered a series of 5-thieny1-
tryptamine derivatives as potent, selective 5-HT1D/1B
Compound 5-HT1D, Ki, (nM)a 5-HT1B (Ki, nM)a 5-HT1B/5-HT1D
receptor agonists. Some of them are 10 times more
potent at the 5-HT1D receptor and 10 times more 5-
HT1D/5-HT1B selective than sumatriptan. These com-
pounds are currently under pharmacological evaluation
which will be reported separately.
Sumatriptan
11
1.7
0.7
0.5
3.2
7.6
19
31
2.5
8.2
1.8
4.5
36
32
23
17
133
303
714
476
70
113
9.9
107
3.2
18.8
32.8
34
41.5
39.8
37.5
15.3
28
9a
9b
9c
9d
9e
9f
9g
9h
9i
13.7
5.5
23.7
References and Notes
9j
9k
1. Migraine: Pharmacology and Genetics; Sandler, M.; Ferrari,
M.; Harnett, S., Eds.; Altman: London, 1996.
2. Plosker, M.; McTavish, D. Drugs 1994, 47, 622.
3. Meng, C. Q. Curr. Med. Chem. 1997, 4, 385.
4. Humphrey, P. P. A.; Goaadsby, P. J. Cephalalgia 1994, 14,
401.
5. Buzzi, M. G.; Bonamini, M.; Moskowitz, M. A. Cephalalgia
1995, 15, 277.
6. Bouchelet, I.; Cohen, Z.; Casee, B.; Seguela, P.; Hamel, E.
Mol. Pharmacol. 1996, 50, 219.
7. (a) Rebeck, G. W.; Maynard, K. I.; Hyman, B. T.;
Moskowitz, M. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 3666;
(b) Moskowitz, M. A.; Macfarlane, R. Brain Metab. Rev.
1993, 5, 159.
8. Yu, X. J.; Waeber, C.; Castanon, N.; Scearce, K.; Hen, R.;
Macor, J. E.; Chaveau, J.; Moskowitz, M. A. Mol. Pharmacol.
1996, 49, 761.
9. Johnson, K. W.; Schaus, J. M.; Durkin, M. M.; Audia, J.
E.; Kaldor, S. W.; Flaugh, M. E.; Adham, N.; Zgombick, J.
M.; Cohen, M. L.; Branchek, T. A.; Phebus, L. A. NeuroRe-
port 1997, 8, 2237.
10. Bouchelet, I.; Cohen, Z.; Seguela, P.; Hamel, E. In
Migraine: Pharmacology and Genetics; Sandler, M.; Ferrari,
M.; Harnett, S., Eds.; Altman: London, 1996; pp 55±66.
11. (a) Parsons, A. A.; Stutchburg, C.; Raval, P.; Kaumann,
A. J. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 1992, 346, 592;
(b) Kaumann, A. J.; Parsons, A. A.; Brown, A. M. Cardiovas.
Res. 1993, 24, 932.
aKi values are given as the mean of at least two independent determi-
nations performed in duplicate.
was ®rst protected as a phthalimide and the phenol
group was converted to the tri¯ate to give intermediate
10.16 Cross-coupling with 2-thiopheneboronic acid
under Suzuki conditions aorded compound 11.
Finally, cleavage of phthalimide with hydrazine gave 5-
thienyltryptamine 9a.
As shown in Table 1, all compounds reported here
exhibited high anity for the 5-HT1D receptor; most of
them being more potent than or comparable to suma-
triptan. In all cases, better 5-HT1D/5-HT1B selectivities
were observed when compared to sumatriptan, some
being over 10 times better. Both 2- and 3-thienyl analo-
gues displayed very similar binding pro®les at both 5-
HT1B receptors (compare 9b with 9c). Introduction of a
substitution to the 5-position of the thieny1 ring in the
N,N-dimethylamine series results in an at least 5-fold
lower anity for both the 5-HT1D and 5-HT1B receptors
(compare 9b and 9d with 9e), and slightly increased 5-
HT1D/5-HT1B selectivity. The same trends are not
observed in the pyrrolidine analogues (compare 9f with
9g). N,N-Dimethylamine derivative 9b, showed an
increased 5-HT1D/5-HT1B selectivity over the corre-
sponding primary amine 9a. The pyrrolidine derivative
9f binds with almost 30-fold lower anity than the N,N
dimethylamine analogue 9b at both 5-HT1D and 5-HT1B
receptors. Introduction of mono- or di-substitutions to the
pyrrolidine ring results in higher anity, though not to
the same extent at 5-HT1D and 5-HT1B receptors. In fact,
12. Castro, J. L.; Collins, I.; Russell, M. G. N.; Watt, A. P.;
Sohal, B.; Rathbone, D.; Beer, M. S.; Stanton, J. A. J. Med.
Chem. 1998, 41, 2667.
13. Ennis, M. E.; Ghazal, R. L.; Smith, M. W.; Schlachter, S.
K.; Lawson, C. F.; Im, W. B.; Pregenzer, J. F.; Svensson, K.
A.; Lewis, R. A.; Hall, E. D.; Sutter, D. M.; Harris, L. T.;
McCall, R. B. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2180.
14. Miyaura, N.; Yanagi, T.; Suzuki, A. Synth. Commun. 1981,
11, 513.
the methoxymethyl derivative (9j) has the lowest 5-HT1D
5-HT1B selectivity. When a double bond is introduced
into the pyrrolidine ring, potencies at both 5-HT1D and
/
15. Stille, J. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 508.
16. Barf, T. A.; de Boer, P.; Wikstrom, H. J. Med. Chem.
1996, 39, 4717.