M. Iwasaki et al. / Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 5200–5203
5203
distillation apparatus (Shibata, GTO-250RS). With the appa-
ratus, it took 5 min to reach 200 ꢀC and additional heating
continued for 15 min. The classical heating at 110 ꢀC shown
in Scheme 3 was done in an oil bath.
4.3.1. 2,2-Dimethyl-6-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-7-octen-3-
1
one (5f). IR (neat) 2967, 1705, 1453, 1367, 769 cmꢂ1; H
NMR (CDCl3) d 1.05 (s, 9H), 2.02–2.09 (m, 1H), 2.14–
2.22 (m, 1H), 2.32 (s, 6H), 2.34–2.47 (m, 2H), 3.84–3.89
(m, 1H), 5.05 (dt, J¼10.5, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 6.08 (ddd, J¼17.5,
10.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 6.96–7.02 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3)
d 21.67, 26.54, 26.59, 34.54, 43.27, 44.25, 114.47, 126.28,
129 (br s), 136.95, 139.51, 140.29, 215.87. Anal. Calcd for
C18H26O: C, 83.67; H, 10.14%. Found: C, 83.66; H, 10.09%.
1H NMR (300 MHz and 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (75.3 MHz
and 125.7 MHz) spectra were taken on Varian Mercury 300
and UNITY INOVA 500 spectrometers and were recorded
in CDCl3. Chemical shifts (d) are in parts per million relative
to tetramethylsilane at 0.00 ppm for 1H and relative to CDCl3
at 77.0 ppm for 13C unless otherwise noted. IR spectra were
determined on a SHIMADZU FTIR-8200PC spectrometer.
TLC analyses were performed on commercial glass plates
bearing 0.25-mm layer of Merck Silica gel 60F254. Silica
gel (Wakogel 200 mesh) was used for column chromato-
graphy. Elemental analyses were carried out at the Elemental
Analysis Center of Kyoto University.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Re-
search and COE Research from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan. K.H.
acknowledges JSPS for financial support.
Unless otherwise noted, materials obtained from commer-
cial suppliers were used without further purification. Tolu-
ene, DMF, and N-methylpyrrolidinone were purchased
from Wako Pure Chemical Co. Dimethylnaphthalene (mix-
ture of regioisomers) was obtained from TCI. Toluene was
stored over slices of sodium. Dimethylnaphthalene, DMF,
and N-methylpyrrolidinone were used as received. Tri(p-
tolyl)phosphine and cesium carbonate were purchased from
Wako Pure Chemical Co. Palladium acetate and tricyclo-
hexylphosphine were obtained from TCI and Acros, respec-
tively. The homoallyl alcohols 1, 4, and 6 were prepared
according to the literature.1b
References and notes
1. (a) Hayashi, S.; Hirano, K.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2210–2211; (b) Iwasaki, M.; Hayashi,
S.; Hirano, K.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 4099–4104.
2. Reviews for microwave-assisted organic reactions: (a)
Microwave Assisted Organic Synthesis; Tierney, J. P.,
€
Lidstrom, P., Eds.; Blackwell: Victoria, 2005; (b) Larhed, M.;
Olofsson, K. Microwave Methods in Organic Synthesis;
Springer: Berlin, 2006; (c) Roberts, B. A.; Strauss, C. R. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 653–661; (d) Tokuyama, H.; Nakamura,
M. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2005, 63, 523–538; (e) de la
Hoz, A.; Diaz-Ortiz, A.; Moreno, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005,
34, 164–178; (f) Kappe, C. O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
4.2. Typical procedure
The reaction of entry 1 in Table 1 is representative. Cesium
carbonate (0.20 g, 0.60 mmol), palladium acetate (5.6 mg,
0.025 mmol), and tri(p-tolyl)phosphine (30 mg, 0.10 mmol)
were placed in a 5-mL glass pressure vial. The vial was
flushed with argon and sealed with a PTFE–silicon septum.
Toluene (2.0 mL) and DMF (0.20 mL) were added, and the
mixture was stirred for 1 min. Homoallyl alcohol 1a (85 mg,
0.50 mmol)and1-bromonaphthalene(2a, 83 mL, 0.60 mmol)
were added. The suspension was heated at 200 ꢀC with stir-
ring for 15 min in the microwave reactor. The mixture was
then cooled to room temperature. Hydrochloric acid (1 M,
3 mL) was added. The organic layer formed was then washed
with brine (5 mL), and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate.
The solvent was evaporated. Silica gel column purification
with hexane as an eluent afforded 1-methallylnaphthalene
(3a, 82 mg, 0.45 mmol) in 90% yield.
€
43, 6250–6284; (g) Lidstrom, P.; Tierney, J.; Wathey, B.;
Westman, J. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9225–9283; (h) Caddick,
S. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 10403–10432; (i) Mingos, D. M. P.;
Baghurst, D. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1991, 20, 1–47.
3. Microwave-assisted carbon–carbon bond cleavage has rarely
been reported: (a) Tanner, D. D.; Kandanarachchi, P.; Ding,
Q.; Shao, H.; Vizitiu, D.; Franz, J. A. Energy Fuels 2001, 15,
197–204; (b) Ahn, J.-A.; Chang, D.-H.; Park, Y. J.; Yon, Y. R.;
Loupy, A.; Jun, C.-H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 55–58.
4. Caution: the black precipitate resulted in extreme microwave
absorption that caused reaction vial to shatter. Although the mi-
crowave reactor is explosion-proof, proper precautions should
be taken.
5. (a) Garbacia, S.; Desai, B.; Lavastre, O.; Kappe, C. O. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 9136–9139; (b) Perreux, L.; Loupy, A.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9199–9223; (c) Kuhnert, N. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1863–1866; (d) Strauss, C. R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3589–3590.
4.3. Characterization data
Spectral data for 3, 5, 7, and 8 were found in the literature1,6
except for 5f.
6. For 3c: Thatia, T.; Jayanth, T.; Jeganmohan, M.; Cheng, C.-H.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2921–2924.