2
Rajeev.T. Ulahannan et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1199 (2020) 127004
standard in CDCl
3
.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Molecular structure
2.1. Computational details
The title compound was synthesised and characterised by 1
H
NMR, FT-IR and SXRD. The results of SXRD showed that the crystal
belonged to monoclinic system of space group P2 /c. The crystal
Computational study of the compound, 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
,4,5-triphenyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole was carried out with
Gaussian 09 [22] program in the ground state using the B3LYP/6-
1G basis set to obtain the optimized molecular structure and
1
1
data obtained is summarised in Table .1. The bond parameters such
as bond length and bond angle were calculated theoretically and
experimental values obtained in SXRD analysis were compared.
Good agreements between experimental and theoretical values
were obtained. The results are shown in Table 2.
3
frequencies corresponding to its vibrational modes. Optimization of
molecular structure was done by Berny's optimization algorithm
using redundant internal coordinates [23]. A scaling factor of 0.9613
was used for obtaining a considerably better agreement with
experimental data; because, the DFT hybrid B3LYP method might
tend to overestimate the fundamental modes. The structure
deduced was confirmed to be of minimum energy because of the
absence of imaginary wave numbers on the calculated vibrational
spectrum. The animation option of GAUSSVIEW program gave a
visual presentation of the vibrational modes [24]. The absorption
and emission of the molecule were studied from the TD-DFT studies
on the molecule as this method was a very successful one to
compute the excited states [25,26]. The energy of neutral molecule
optimized in neutral state, energy of neutral molecule optimized in
cation state, energy of cation state optimized in neutral state and
energy of neutral molecule optimized in anion state were obtained
using the TD-DFT/B3LYP6-31G computations [27].
Experimental and optimized bond length and bond angles of the
title compound were compared. A good agreement was observed
and is given in Table 2. The root mean square deviation (RMSD)
values of bond length and bond angles were calculated using the
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ꢀ
ꢁ
n
P
2
1
calc
i
exp
i
expression, RMS ¼
ðn
ꢁ
n
Þ
. The RMSD for bond
nꢁ1
i
ꢀ
length was 0.459 Å and that for bond angle was 0.520 . Complete
results of these studies are given in the supplementary data.
Hydrogen refinements were done by keeping aliphatic methyl
3
CH hydrogen fixed and refined by difference in electron density
synthesis method and riding model is followed in phenyl ring.
Imidazoles are reported to show weak non covalent interaction.
Indole-benzene reported to favours
p-p stacking interaction [29].
Table 1
Crystal data and structure refinement for 2(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,4,5-triphenyl-2,5-
dihydro-1H-imidazole.
2
1
.2. Synthesis of 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,4,5-triphenyl-2,5-dihydro-
H-imidazole
Empirical formula
28 22 2
C H N O
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength
Volume
Space group
Mr ¼ 402.47
T ¼ 296 K
The title compound was synthesised by solvent free synthesis by
taking benzil (1 mmol), 4-methoxybezaldehyde (1 mmol), aniline
l
¼ 0.71073 Å
(
1 mmol), NH
4
OAc (1.3 mol %) and 0.2 g activated K10 clay catalyst.
3
V ¼ 2165.9 (4) Å
ꢀ
The mixture was stirred at 120 C [28]. The formation of the
product was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the
completion of the reaction, hot ethanol was added to the mixture
and the insoluble catalyst was filtered off. The pure product was
obtained by column chromatography using hexane and ethyl ace-
tate (8:2 v/v) as eluent. The purified product was recrystallised
from ethanol. (Scheme 1).
P21/c
ꢁ3
ꢁ3
Crystal system Dx,g cm
Unit cell dimensions
Monoclinic, 1.234 Mgm
a ¼ 10.5906 (10) Å
b ¼ 10.3985 (8) Å
c ¼ 20.193 (2) Å
ꢀ
a
b
g
4
¼ 90
ꢀ
¼ 103.105 (4)
o
¼ 90
Z
F(000)
F(000 )
hklmax
848.0
848.38
14,13,26
0
2.3. X-ray diffraction studies
Crystal size
Reflections collected
0.25 ꢂ 0.25 ꢂ 0.20 mm
3302 reflections with I > 2s(I)
Single crystal X-ray diffraction patterns of 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
,4,5-triphenyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole were collected on Bruker
AXS Kappa Apex 2 CCD diffractometer. Data collection was carried
out using APEX 2 (Bruker, 2004), Cell refinement was done with
APEX 2/SAINT (Bruker, 2004) and data reduction with SAINT/XPREP
Bruker 2004). Structure was solved with SIR 92 program. Structure
was refined with SHELXL 97, Molecular graphics was plotted with
ORTEP-3 and Mercury.
Independent reflections
5155 independent reflections [Rint ¼ 0.032]
H-atom parameters constrained
Refinement on F2
1
Least-squares matrix: full
H-atom parameters constrained
2
2
ꢁ3
R[F > 2
s
(F )] ¼ 0.048
Drmax ¼ 0.17 e Å
2
ꢁ3
wR(F ) ¼ 0.157
Drmin ¼ ꢁ0.24 e Å
S ¼ 1.07
(
5155 reflections
2
0
81 parameters
restraints
CH3
O
NH
2
Ph
Ph
O
O
Clay Catalyst
N
N
+
+
+
NH OAc
4
0
OCH
3
120 C
CHO
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,4,5-triphenyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole.