1
Table 1 H NMR Chemical shifts (δ/ppm) of 2a–h and 2aЈ–hЈ
1
Compound
Solvent
H Chemical shifts
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
a
aЈ
b
bЈ
c
cЈ
d
CDCl3
CDCl3
10.8 (1H, s, NH), 6.89 (1H, s, H6), 5.35 (1H, s, H8), 4.22 (2H, q, OCH ), 3.86 (3H, s, OMe), 1.30 (3H, t, CH )
2 3
9.2 (1H, br s, NH), 6.82 (1H, s, H6), 5.75 (1H, s, H8), 4.25 (2H, q, OCH ), 3.86 (3H, s, OMe), 1.31 (3H, t, CH )
2
3
CDCl
11.92 (1H, s, NH), 6.85 (1H, s, H6), 5.61 (1H, s, H8), 3.85 (3H, s, OMe), 3.09 (3H, s, NCH ), 3.02 (3H, s, NCH )
3 3
3
2
[ H ]DMSO
12.2 (1H, br s, NH), 6.52 (1H, s, H6), 6.18 (1H, s, H8), 3.77 (3H, s, OMe), 3.01 (3H, s, CH ), 2.90 (3H, s, NCH )
6
3
3
2
[ H ]DMSO
13.8–11.2 (1H, br s, NH), 6.66 (1H, s, H6), 5.43 (1H, s, H8), 3.78 (3H, s, OMe)
13.8–11.2 (1H, br s, NH), 6.72 (1H, s, H6), 5.38 (1H, s, H8), 3.80 (3H, s, OMe)
6
2
[ H ]DMSO
6
2
[ H ]DMSO
12.39 (1H, s, NH), 9.47 (1H, s, NH), 8.0–8.2 (1H, m, ArH), 8.0–7.2 (3H, m, 3 ArH), 6.56 (1H, s, H6), 6.20 (1H,
s, H8), 3.77 (3H, s, OCH ), 2.22 (3H, s, ArCH )
6
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
e
[ H ]DMSO
11.63 (1H, s, NH), 10.10 (1H, s, NH), 7.56 (2H, d, ArH), 7.37 (1H, t, ArH), 6.71 (1H, s, H6), 5.83 (1H, s, H8),
.79 (3H, s, OCH3)
12.41 (1H, s, NH), 10.06 (1H, s, NH), 7.55 (2H, d, ArH), 7.35 (1H, t, ArH), 6.55 (1H, s, H6), 6.14 (1H, s, H8),
.76 (3H, s, OCH3)
6
3
2
eЈ
f
[ H ]DMSO
6
3
2
[ H ]DMSO
11.73 (1H, s, NH), 9.41 (1H, s, NH), 7.12–6.89 (4H, m, ArH), 6.91 (1H, s, H6), 6.08 (1H, s, H8), 3.84 (3H, s,
OCH ), 3.77 (3H, s, OCH )
6
3
3
2
fЈ
g
[ H ]DMSO
12.42 (1H, s, NH), 9.52 (1H, s, NH), 8.01 (1H, d, ArH), 7.08–7.03 (3H, m, ArH), 6.93–6.89 (1H, m, ArH), 6.54
1H, s, C H), 6.38 (1H, s, H8), 3.84 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.77 (3H, s, OCH )
6
(
6
3
3
CDCl3
11.9 (1H, s, NH), 6.85 (1H, s, H6), 5.65 (1H, s, H8), 3.85 (3H, s, OMe), 3.60 (3H, br s, NCH ), 3.49 (3H, br s,
3
NCH ), 1.4–1.7 (6H, m, 3 CH )
3
2
gЈ
CDCl3
9.83 (1H, br s, NH), 6.74 (1H, s, H6), 5.18 (1H, s, H8), 3.83 (3H, s, OMe), 3.60 (3H, br s, NCH ), 3.49 (3H, br s,
3
NCH ), 1.4–1.7 (6H, m, 3 CH )
3
2
2
2
2
5
h
[ H ]DMSO
11.92 (1H, s, NH), 6.68 (1H, s, H6), 6.22 (1H, s, H8), 3.78 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.4–3.6 (8H, m, 4 CH )
6
3
2
2
hЈ
a
[ H ]DMSO
12.2 (1H, s, NH), 6.53 (1H, s, H6), 6.18 (1H, s, H8), 3.77 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.3–3.7 (8H, m, 4 CH )
3 2
6
2
[ H ]DMSO
7.92 (1H, d, NH), 7.31 and 7.52 (4H, AB, J 8.4, C H ), 6.73 (1H, s, H6), 3.81 (3H, s, OCH ), 2.88 (3H, s, CH ),
6
6
4
3
3
2
.35 (3H, s, CH3)
2
5
b
[ H ]DMSO
7.90 (1H, d, NH), 7.33 and 7.55 (4H, AB, J 8.4, C H ), 6.73 (1H, s, H6), 3.81 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.1–3.6 (8H, m,
6
6
4
3
4
CH ), 2.37 (3H, s, CH )
2
3
1
13
13
O
N
S
detail with H and C NMR spectroscopy. The C NMR
2 3
MeO2C
S
H
chemical shifts and coupling constants ( J
Hz) of 2a–h and 2aЈ–hЈ indicate that for both isomers
2a–h and 2aЈ–hЈ the C5᎐C6 double bond exists in the (Z)-
configuration and therefore the formation of the second isomer
of 2a–h can be associated only with rotation about the C2᎐C8
bond (Table 2). The configuration of the C2᎐C8 bond was
determined by 1D NOE experiments. In the case of the (Z,Z)-
isomer we expected that saturation of the NH-proton would
give an NOE enhancement of the H8-proton but instead we
~ 1 Hz; J
~
C4–H6
C7–H6
R
H
NH2
+
5
CO2Me
CO2Me
O
N
᎐
CH3
NH
N
R
N
᎐
᎐
O
CH3
4a,b
5a,b
performed an excitation on the H O-signal because the N-H
signal was broad and in some cases even not observed. Because
2
a R = NMe2 b R = N
O
of chemical exchange between the labile N-H proton with H O
2
Scheme 2
the transfer of saturation from H O to the N-H proton leads to
2
an NOE enhancement of the H8-proton. These experiments
have proved that the compounds 2aЈ–hЈ can be assigned the
The presence of two exocyclic double bonds in the structure
of 2a allows for several geometric configurations. Indeed the
heating of thiazolidine 2a in ethanol or DMSO leads to the
formation of the isomeric product 2aЈ (Scheme 3). This process
(
Z,Z)-isomeric form. The proton chemical shifts of the com-
pounds 2a–h and 2aЈ–hЈ are shown in Table 1.
We have also studied the conversion of 2a–h [the (E,Z)-
2
1
isomer] to 2aЈ–hЈ [the (Z,Z)-isomer] in [ H ]DMSO by
H
6
MeO2C
H
MeO2C
H
NMR spectroscopy at 298 K. The compounds 2b,e,f convert in
1
00% yield to their (Z,Z)-isomer, compound 2c in 82% and
O
H
O
compound 2h in 80%. In CDCl , 2a only converts in 10% yield
to 2aЈ. Clearly, the (E,Z)-isomers 2 are stabilized in non-polar
solvents by the formation of an intramolecular hydrogen bond.
In a polar solvent, such as [ H
S
S
3
N
O
NH
O
H
2
EtO
H
]DMSO, intermolecular hydro-
6
gen bonding with the solvent allows the formation of the (Z,Z)-
isomers, which now may be stabilized by a close S ؒ ؒ ؒ O con-
tact. This also explains the formation of the two isomers in
the case of 2c–cЈ, where the cyano function will not interact
either with the sulfur or the NH-group of the thiazolidine ring.
EtO
2
a
2a′
13
Scheme 3
proceeded in 20% conversion after 7 days when chloroform was
used as a solvent. A number of thioamides 1b–h were reacted
analogously with DMAD to afford the thiazolidine products
b–h (Scheme 1). The N,N-dimethylcarbamoyl derivative 1b
gave a mixture, from which both 2b and an isomeric compound
bЈ were isolated. Cyanothioacetamide 1c gave an inseparable
mixture of thiazolidines 2c,cЈ, whereas the other thioamides
d–h only yielded the isomer 2d–h. The formation of the second
Conclusions
2
Thus, reaction of malonthioamide derivatives with dimethyl
acetylenedicarboxylate leads to new thiazole derivatives, and
to the previously unknown 2,5-dimethylenethiazolidin-4-one
system. It is worth noting that compounds 1, in contrast to
2
1
7
6
isomers for the products 2d–h were monitored by TLC and
NMR spectroscopy; these isomers were not isolated. The
geometric configuration of 2a–h and 2aЈ–hЈ was studied in
thiocarbamoylazomethine ylide and enamino thioamides, do
not enter into the reaction with methyl propiolate, which reveals
their relatively low nucleophilicity.
2
134
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1998