SONG Hongbing et al. / Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2012, 33: 666–669
cyanoacetate achieved much higher yield than those of the
Table 2 Effect of recycling on the reaction
reactions between benzaldehyde and malononitrile/ethyl
cyanoacetate. In addition, malononitrile was more reactive than
ethyl cyanoacetate with the same aromatic aldehyde because
the electron withdrawing ability of the substituent CN group is
stronger than that of the carbonyl group, that is, the methylene
group of malononitrile was more reactive than that of ethyl
cyanoacetate and reacted more readily with aromatic alde-
hydes, which is consistent with a precious report [26].
a
Recycle time
Isolated yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
95
94
92
89
87
84
Reaction conditions: 10 mmol furfural, 10 mmol ethyl cyanoacetate, 1
1
o
The isolated products were also characterized by H NMR,
mmol [bmim][Pro], 10 ml H
Refer to isolated pure product 3a, unless stated otherwise.
2
O, 25 C, 20 min.
1
3
a
C NMR, and IR as follows.
1
3
a (Table 1) H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) ꢀ 1.40 (t, J = 7.2
3
1
3
Hz, 3H), 4.39 (q, 2H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (t, J = 7.2
Hz, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.16 (s, 1H). C NMR (400
MHz, CDCl ) ꢀ 14.09, 62.51, 98.92, 116.37, 123.97, 133.93,
154.77, 161.33, 163.21. IR (KBr): 3325, 3024, 2226, 1714,
1
3
Hz, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 8.26 (s, 1H). C NMR (400
3
MHz, CDCl ) ꢀ 14.19, 62.73, 103.03, 129.26, 131.05, 133.28,
3
ꢀ
1
1
1
55.00, 162.48. IR (KBr): 2980, 2220, 1730, 1600, 1440,
1587, 1443, 1284, 1205, 1171, 843, 515 cm .
ꢀ
1
300, 1260, 1200, 1090, 1010, 768, 683, 582, 482 cm .
1
3
b (Table 1) H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) ꢀ 7.55 (t, J = 8.0
2.3 Recycle of [bmim][Pro]
3
Hz, 2H), 7.63 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 7.6
1
3
Hz, 2H). C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) ꢀ 14.20, 62.68, 102.96,
It is well known that a notable advantage of an IL as a
catalyst is its recyclability. After product filtration and water
evaporation, the catalyst was reused for the reaction.
[bmim][Pro] IL was successfully recycled six times without a
decrease in activity. All the reactions were completed in 20
min and yields of 84%–95% were obtained (Table 2).
3
1
1
29.21, 131.00, 133.28, 155.13, 163.25. IR (KBr): 3032, 2222,
ꢀ
1
591, 1448, 1215, 957, 756, 677, 617, 517 cm .
1
3
c (Table 1) H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) ꢀ 1.38 (t, J = 7.2
3
Hz, 3H), 4.35(q, 2H), 6.66(q, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H),
1
3
7
.75(d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (s, 1H). C NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl ) ꢀ 14.14, 62.89, 98.82, 113.84, 115.31, 121.71, 139.46,
3
1
2
5
48.52, 149.04, 162.57. IR (KBr): 3420, 3130, 3040, 2990,
220, 1920, 1720, 1620, 1540, 1460, 1370, 1260, 1020, 760,
2.4 Mechanism of Knoevenagel condensation catalyzed
by [bmim][Pro]
ꢀ
1
88 cm .
d (Table 1) H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) ꢀ 6.71 (q, 1H),
1
3
An IL derived from natural L-proline can behave as an anion
and it has been proposed that the L-proline functional group
acts as a “microaldolase” that facilitates the reaction steps
including the formation of the imine intermediate and the
carbon-carbon bond [27]. Hence, a mechanism (Fig. 1) can be
proposed where the L-proline anion acts as an organocatalyst
with the acceptor role of the corresponding iminium interme-
3
7
.37 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H).
1
3
C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) ꢀ 30.85, 112.50, 113.69, 114.36,
1
1
23.20, 142.98, 148.09, 149.41. IR (KBr): 3043, 2226, 1606,
ꢀ
1
455, 1294, 1149, 1020, 937, 766, 582 cm .
1
3
e (Table 1) H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) ꢀ 1.38 (t, J = 7.2
3
Hz, 3H), 4.35 (q, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = 1.6
Fig. 1. Mechanism for Knoevenagel condensation catalyzed by [bmim][Pro].