Jian Li et al.
COMMUNICATIONS
Scheme 3. Proposed mechanism for the formation of furans.
pared and isolated by using a copper catalyst and and AuBr
(5 mol%) in methanol (2 mL) was stirred at
08C for 20 h. After completion of the reaction (observed
3
6
then treated under the standard reaction condition
with the gold catalyst. Indeed the target compound 3h
was collected in 69% yield. This strongly suggests that
an A3-coupling reaction of the substrates 1, 2g and
morpholine stands at the beginning of the reaction
cascade.
on TLC), the solvent was evaporated under reduced pres-
sure to obtain the crude mixture. The residue was purified
by silica-gel column chromatography (ethyl acetate/petrole-
um ether=1/10–1/4) to afford the pure product 3. The ob-
tained product was analyzed by H NMR, C NMR and
HR-MS.
1
13
[12]
Based on these experiments, we propose
the
mechanism illustrated in Scheme 3 for the formation
of the furans 3. An initial AuBr -catalyzed A3-cou-
3
pling of 1 with 2 and morpholine generates the inter- References
mediate 4. This homopropargylic alcohol 4 then un-
[
13]
dergoes an intramolecular cyclization
which after
[1] a) A. Boto, L. Alvarez, in: Heterocycles in Natural
Product Synthesis, (Eds.: K. C. Majumdar, S. K. Chatto-
padhyay), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2011; b) J. Kobaya-
shi, D. Watanabe, N. Kawasaki, M. Tsuda, J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 9236–9239.
protodemetallation delivers dihydrofuran intermedi-
ate B’. Aromatization by elimination of the amine
[
14]
then leads to the final product 3.
In summary, we have established a new Au(III)-cat-
alyzed A3-coupling/cyclization cascade to afford
furan-2-ylmethanol derivatives. This versatile protocol
enables easy access towards the target products from
abundantly available alkynes and aldehydes as start-
ing materials and is operated under mild reaction con-
ditions. With regard to the synthetic efficiency it is
important to note that the functionalized furfuryl al-
cohols are formed in one synthetic step and not by
post-functionalizations of a preformed furan system.
Three new bonds are formed overall, thus a yield of
[
2] a) J. B. Sperry, D. L. Wright, Curr. Opin. Drug Discov.
Devel. 2005, 8, 723–740; b) Y. Wang, Y.-C. Luo, X.-Q.
Hu, P. -F. Xu, Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5346–5349.
[
3] Selected examples: a) A. Gandini, M. N. Belgacem,
Prog. Polym. Sci. 1997, 22, 1203–1379; b) C. C. Wu,
W. Y. Hung, T. L. Liu, L. Z. Zhang, T. Y. Luh, J. Appl.
Phys. 2003, 93, 5465–5471; c) E. Ripaud, D. Demeter,
T. Rousseau, E. Boucard-Cetol, M. Allain, R. Po, P.
Leriche, J. Roncali, Dyes Pigm. 2012, 95, 126–133.
[4] Reviews: a) X. L. Hou, H. Y. Cheung, T. Y. Hon, P. L.
Kwan, T. H. Lo, S. Y. Tong, H. N. C. Wong, Tetrahedron
1
998, 54, 1955–2020; b) T. L. Gilchrist, J. Chem. Soc.
5
1% is equivalent to an average efficiency of 80% for
Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 2849–2866; c) A. V. Gulevich,
A. S. Dudnik, N. Chernyak, V. Gevorgyan, Chem. Rev.
each bond formation, the best yield of 71% even to
an average of 91%. Therefore we believe that this
protocol offers an attractive alternative to existing
protocols for the synthesis of these valuable building
blocks.
2
013, 113, 3084–3213; d) K.-S. Yeung, Z. Yang, X.-S.
Peng, X.-L. Hou, Prog. Heterocycl. Chem. 2011, 23,
181–216; e) T. Graening, F. Thrun, in: Comprehensive
Heterocyclic Chemistry III, Vol. 3, (Eds.: A. R. Katritz-
ky, C. A. Ramsden, E. F. V. Scriven, R. J. K. Taylor),
Elsevier, Oxford, 2008, pp 497–569.
[
[
5] M. E. Jung, J.-M. Ku, L. Dub, H. Hu, R. A. Gatti,
Experimental Section
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 5842–5848.
6] B. Martín-Matute, C. Nevado, D. J. Cµrdenas, A. M.
Echavarren J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5757–5766.
7] D. Ghosh, H. M. Lee, Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 5534–5537.
8] a) C. Paizs, M. I. Tosa, L. C. Bencze, Heterocycles 2011,
82, 1217–1228; b) U. E. Hille, C. Zimmer, C. A. Vock,
R. W. Hartmann, ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 2–6.
General Procedure; Synthesis of 5-Subsititued Furan-
[
[
2-ylmethanol 3
In
a
one-necked flask,
a
solution ofglyceraldehyde
1
(0.3 mmol), morpholine (4.5 mmol), alkyne 2 (4.5 mmol)
2
10
ꢁ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 207 – 211