3
252 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 10, 1998
Siskos et al.
Ta ble 1. Sp ectr oscop ic Absor p tion Da ta of 1a -e in
Certainly, with the aniline chromophore there is the
risk of introducing additional complications into the
system due to the well-known tendency of the aniline
function to photoionize in polar solvents, usually water,
a
MeCN
1
1,15
or to break the N-H bond in nonpolar solvents.
R
H
o-Me
m-Me
p-Me
p-Ph3C
hν
hν
-
•+
•
•
1
a
b
c
d
e
e + PhNH
7
PhNH2
8 PhNH + H
2
water
hexane
λmax (nm)
log ꢀ
M
236
236
240
240
265
4.23
4.21
4.12
4.16
4.08
-
1
cm-1
)
We present here a laser flash photolysis (LFP) and
electron spin resonance (ESR) study, supported by prod-
uct analysis, on the aniline derivatives 1. Our data
indicate that compounds 1 undergo clean homolytic
photodissociation to trityl radical, in both polar (aceto-
nitrile) and nonpolar solvents (hexane), with high quan-
tum yields, competing effectively with other possible
pathways, such as heterolysis or photoionization. This
photobehavior follows nicely Michl’s predictions. In
(
a
They show an additional shoulder at 300-310 nm (log ꢀ ∼
-
1
-1
3
.3 M cm ).
N-(triphenylmethyl)aniline derivatives 1a -e, keeping in
mind Michl’s “spirit”: a low δCN (nitrogen is the closest
of the first row elements to carbon), a weak central C-N
9
σ bond (∼39 kcal/mol), and a local chromophore
aniline)8
a,10a
(
with high excitation energy (Esinglet > 90
kcal/mol, Etriplet > 70 kcal/mol).10 While the absorption
sharp contrast, we obtained (see Figure 1c) under the
spectra of 1a -e are the sum of the methylene-isolated
phenyl and anilino chromophores (see Table 1), the
fluorescence spectra which we obtained in hexane are
characteristic of the anilino chromophore (emission at
•
same conditions (MeCN/248-nm laser) a ratio [Ph
3
C ]:
+
[
Ph
very different than in diarylmethyl chlorides;
noted here is the large δCCl and the strengthening of the
3
C ] = 1:1.4 by the photodissociation of Ph
3
C-Cl, not
16a
to be
1
0b
λ
max ≈ 330 nm).
our system to Michl’s approach would presumably be the
nonpure” ππ* character of the lowest excited states (S
), due to the perturbing effect of the lone pair on
The main justified objection to relating
1
6b
C-Cl bond (∼60 kcal/mol) compared to C-N.
“
T
1
,
Exp er im en ta l Section
1
Ma ter ia ls. The synthesis of N-(triphenylmethyl)aniline
1
1
nitrogen. However, in aniline this contribution seems
17,18
derivatives 1a -e has been described previously.
They
to be rather small (∼22%), and S
1 2
and probably S remain
were purified by recrystallization (twice) from methanol or a
in fact ππ* states.1
1a,12
mixure of methanol and CHCl . The triphenylmethyl chloride
3
The photodissociation of the C-N bond in benzylic
(Merck) was recrystallized from hexane by adding drops of
acetyl chloride. Ph CH (Fluka) was recrystallized from ligroin,
3
compounds has recently attracted much attention, but
most studies concern ammonium salts,2a,d where the C-N
9-Ph-fluorene (9-Ph-flH) was prepared from the corresponding
carbinol,19 and 9-Ph-fl-NHPh from the 9-Ph-fl-Cl and aniline.
Acetonitrile (MeCN), hexane, cyclohexane, ethanol, tetrachlo-
romethane (Merck), and n-butyl chloride (Fluka) were spec-
troscopic grade and used as received.
20
bond already possesses considerable ground-state car-
+
13
bocation-dipole character (R
3
C ‚‚‚NR′
3
)
due to the
increased electronegativity of the ammonium group.
There do exist also some product studies apart from the
classical papers by Lewis and Lipkin
1
4
In str u m en ts. Fluorescence spectra (uncorrected) were
obtained on a Spex Fluorolog. Electron spin resonance spectra
were obtained on a Varian E-109 spectrometer. Gas chro-
matographic analyses and separations were conducted on a
1
4a
and Porter and
Stracham.1
4b,15b
(
9) On the basis of the known BDH of the C-N bond in H C-NHPh
3
9a
(
68.9 kcal/mol) and the calculated difference of ∼30 kcal/mol in the
(12) The spectrum is recorded 18 µs after the pulse to avoid T-T
9
b
9c,47
12a
BDH’s between H
3
C-H (105 kcal/mol) and Ph
3
C-H (75 kcal/mol),
absorptions of the triplet state of aniline (lifetime of the triplet state
1
2b
we arrive at a value ∼39 kcal/mol for the BDH in Ph
3
C-NHPh, not
is 1.2 µs in benzene and 4.3 µs in dioxane; we found 2.8 µs in MeCN).
(a) Malkin, Ya. N.; Ruziev, Sh.; Kuz'min, V. A. J . Gen. Chem. USSR
1987, 57, 560. (b) Shimamori, H.; Sato, A. J . Phys. Chem. 1994, 98,
13481.
considering, however, possible steric effects which should decrease the
BDH even more. (a) Colussi, A. J .; Benson, S. W. Int. J . Chem. Kinet.
978, 10, 1139; For a critical review, see: Batt, L.; Robinson, G. N.
1
The Chemistry of the Functional Groups, Suppl. F; Patai, S., Ed.; Wiley-
Intersience, Chichester, 1982; Part 2, p 1035. (b) McMillen, D. F.;
Golden, D. M. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1982, 33, 493. (c) Breslow, R.;
Grant, J . L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 7745; see for a discussion of
the trityl stabilization energy: (d) Beckhaus, H.-D.; Dogan, B.;
Schuetzer, J .; Hellman, S.; R u¨ chardt, C. Chem. Ber. 1990, 123, 137.
(13) Boyd, S. L.; Boyd, R. J .; Bessonette, P. W.; Kerdraon, D. I.;
Aucoin, N. T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8816.
(14) (a) Lewis, G. N.; Lipkin, D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 2801.
(b) Porter, G.; Stracham, E. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1958, 54, 1595. (c)
Ogata, Y.; Takagi, K. J . Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 1642. (d) Ratclieff, M.
A., Kochi, J . K. J . Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 3268. (e) Bekowies, P. J .;
Albrecht, A. C. J . Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 431. (f) Shi, M.; Okamoto, Y.;
Takamuku, S. J . Chem. Res.(S). 1990, 346.
(15) (a) Qin, L.; Tripathi, N. R.; Schuler, R. H. Z. Naturforsch. 1985,
40a, 1026. (b) Land, E. J .; Porter, G. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1963, 59,
2027. (c) Malkin, Ya. N.; Ruziev, Sh.; Pigorov, N. O.; Kuz’min, V. A.
Bull. Akad. USSR, Ser. Chem, 1987, 51. (d) Leyva, E.; Platz, M. S.;
Niu, B.; Wirz, J . J . Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 2293. (e) Wagner, B. D.;
Ruel, G.; Lusztyk, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 511.
(
9
b
9b
H
C-H (105 kcal/mol) and PhCH
-NHPh ∼56 kcal/mol.
10) The energy of the lowest excited state of various (triarylmethyl)-
anilino derivatives is reported to be localized on the anilino
BDH of the C-N bond in PhCH
chromophore.8
solvents), 91.8 kcal/mol (polar) and ETriplet ) 71.0 kcal/mol (nonpolar),
7
8
(16) (a) A ratio 1: 1.6 was reported for Ph CH-Cl by Steenken and
2
6
b
•
L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 6777. Cremers, D. A.; Cremers, T. L.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983, 94, 102. Spears, K. G.; Gray, T. H.; Huang, D.
J . Phys. Chem.. 1986, 90, 779. Geiger, M. W.; Turro, N. J .; Waddel,
W. H. Photochem. Photobiol. 1977, 25, 15. (b) We measured the
co-workers. (b) From ∆H°
f
(Ph
(Ph
kcal/mol is obtained for the BDH of the C-Cl bond in Ph
is reasonable in view of the reported values of 64 kcal/mol for Ph
3
C-Cl)gas ) 53.3 kcal/mol, ∆H°
f
(Cl )gas
C )gas ) 84.5 kcal/mol, a value of 61
C-Cl. This
1
6c
•
9d
) 29.9 kcal/mol, and ∆H°
f
3
3
2
-
6
b
9b
fluorescence spectra of the compounds PhNHMe, PhNHCH
NHCHPh , and PhNHCPh (1a ) (0.05 mM in hexane, excitation at 240
and 300 nm) and found emissions at λmax 328, 332, 327, and 327 nm,
2
Ph, Ph-
2
CH-Cl, and 72.2 kcal/mol for PhCH -Cl. (c) NIST Standard
Reference Database 25; Lias, S. G., Liebman, J ., Lewin, R. D., Kafafi,
S. A., Eds.; 1994; Version 2.0.
2
3
1
0a.
respectively, typical values for the anilino chromophore.
11) (a) Malkin, J . Photochemical and Photophysical Properties of
(17) Siskos, M. G.; Tzerpos, N. I.; Zarkadis, A. K. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Belg. 1996, 105, 759.
(
Aromatic Compounds; CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1992; p 117, 201. (b)
Malkin, Ya. N.; Kuz'min, V. A. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1985, 54, 1041. (c)
Saito, F.; Tobita, S.; Shizuka, H. J . Photochem. Photobiol. A, 1997,
(18) Siskos, M. G.; Garas, S. K.; Zarkadis, A. K.; Bokaris, E. P. Chem.
Ber. 1992, 125, 2477.
(19) Schuler, R. H.; Hartzell, A, L.; Behar, B. J . Phys. Chem. 1981,
85, 192.
1
06, 119. (d) Saito, F.; Tobita, S.; Shizuka, H. J . Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans. 1996, 92, 4177.
(20) Kliegl, A. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1905, 38, 284.