The Cu(II)–carbene fragment is interesting in its own right since
it is implicated in so many copper catalysed carbene transfer
reactions, but usually is too reactive to isolate and study.9 Despite
growing a range of crystals of 3 and 4 that appeared optically to be
suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction, we have been unable to
obtain diffraction patterns from any. However, careful oxidation of
[Cu{OC(Ph)(CH2{1-C[NCHCHNBut]})2}]2 ([CuLo]2) previously
made in our laboratory,4 afforded an orange, highly crystalline,
tetrametallic complex in very low yield, 5%, characterised as [{(m-
O)[CuClLo]2}2] 5, Fig. 2.∑
To the best of our knowledge there is only one other
crystallographically characterised organometallic Cu(II) complex;
the N-confused porphyrin complex [CuII{calix[4]phyrin}] has a
2.007(4) Å Cu–C distance, the average Cu(II)–C distance in 5 is
1.99(3) Å. The Cu centres are slightly distorted square planes with
the alkoxide O atom displaced out of the plane by 0.102 Å.
As well as being rare examples of organometallic Cu(II),10 these
A recent study of catalysts made from copper(II) salts with added
chiral monodentate NHC ligands gave ees of up to 39% at 220 °C
with [:C{(NCH(Ph)Me)CH}2], (but with a yield of 60%), with
improved enantioselectivities at 278 °C over 16 h (to 69% ee), or
with a different test substrate ketone.11
In summary, a range of new anionic, heterobidentate ligands that
combine the strong s-donor N-heterocyclic carbene with an
alkoxide, and the first characterised lithium salts of a bidentate
NHC ligand are easily made. Chiral complexes of rare divalent
copper organometallics have been isolated, these catalyse con-
jugate addition reactions. The first crystal structure of a non-
macrocyclic organometallic copper(II) complex has also been
presented. The insight into the Cu(II)–NHC moiety should aid in
future catalyst, or LAC additive, design.
We thank Dr Simon Woodward, Ms Victoria Albrow, and Mr
Miguel Robredo for help with the catalysis, and to the Royal
Society and the EPSRC for funding (fellowship for PLA,
studentships for MR, ACS).
are the first complexes that tether the NHC group to the copper(II
)
centre by an anionic group, providing an alternative source of
stereocontrol in 3 or 4. NHCs are usually rendered chiral by
incorporation of
a
chiral hydrocarbyl N-substituent e.g.
[:C{(NCH(Ph)Me)CH}2], or by C2 symmetrical 1,2-dialkylation of
the backbone of the saturated NHC analogue, e.g.
[:C{(NR)CHBut}2].
The catalysis of conjugate addition to cyclohexenone, eqn. (1),
by 3 and 4 has been studied. Complex (R)–2b was used to make
enantiomerically pure 3b. All the complexes tested show rapid and
high-yielding catalysis of the substrate, as would be predicted from
the bound NHC donor group, Table 1.
The most efficient catalyst is the N-methylated t-butoxide 3b.
This NHC group is the least sterically encumbered, but makes the
poorest NHC donor. There are no reports of the use of copper
alkoxides as catalysts for conjugate addition reactions, but it is
possible that the alkoxide also contributes to the activity of this
catalyst. The homochiral complex gave an ee of 51%. This
represents good (3 : 1) selectivity, particularly at this relatively high
temperature and short reaction time.
Notes and references
‡ Crystallographic data for all complexes are deposited with the CCDC:
for crystallographic data in .cif or other electronic format.
§ 2b C28 H54 I2 Li4 N4 O4 Mr = 792.31, monoclinic, a = 12.880(2), b =
15.655(2) c = 19.034(2) Å, b = 93.239(2)°,U 3831.8 Å3, T = 150 K, space
group C2/c, Z = 4, dc = 1.373 Mg m23, m(Mo–Ka) = 1.674 mm21 11901
unique reflections (Rint = 0. 031) used in all calculations. Final R1 [4326
reflections with F > 4s(F)] = 0.0362 and wR(all F2) was 0.0854.
¶ 3b: pale green solid, yield 63%. 4a: purple solid, yield 69%. 4b: purple
solid, yield 76%. Anal. calcd. (found) for C20H34CuN4O2·2.5C7H8·2LiI: C,
48.74 (49.05); H, 5.89 (5.27); N, 6.06(6.74).
∑ 5: C48.4 H65.6 Cl4 Cu4 N8 O3.6 Mr = 1215.46, tetragonal, a = b =
14.763(3), c = 27.053(6) Å, U 5896(4) Å3, T = 150(2) K, space group
P41212, Z = 4, dc 1.369 Mg m23, m(Mo–Ka) = 1.649 mm21 7023 unique
reflections (Rint = 0.189) used in all calculations. Final R1 [5208 reflections
with F > 4s(F)] = 0.0645 and wR(all F2) was 0.214.
(1)
1 H. Y. Zhou, E. J. Campbell and S. T. Nguyen, Org. Lett., 2001, 3,
2229.
2 P. K. Fraser and S. Woodward, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 2747; J.
Pytkowicz, S. Roland and P. Mangeney, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
2001, 12, 2087.
3 (a) S. Lee and J. F. Hartwig, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 3402; (b) J. J. Van
Veldhuizen, S. B. Garber, J. S. Kingsbury and A. H. Hoveyda, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 4954; (c) M. C. Perry and K. Burgess,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2003, 14, 951.
4 (a) P. L. Arnold, A. C. Scarisbrick, A. J. Blake and C. Wilson, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 2340; (b) P. L. Arnold, S. A. Mungur, A. J. Blake and
C. Wilson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 5981.
5 (a) P. L. Arnold, Heteroatom Chem., 2002, 13, 534; (b) H. Kaur, F. K.
Zinn, E. D. Stevens and S. P. Nolan, Organometallics, 2004, 23, 1157;
(c) A. A. D. Tulloch, A. A. Danopoulos, S. Kleinhenz, M. E. Light, M.
B. Hursthouse and G. Eastham, Organometallics, 2001, 20, 2027.
6 X. L. Hu, I. Castro-Rodriguez and K. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003,
125, 12237.
7 There are three other Li–NHC crystal structures with a mean of 2.20 Å
including bridging NHC-complexes: Ref. 4b ; A. J. Arduengo, M.
Tamm, J. C. Calabrese, F. Davidson and W. J. Marshall, Chem. Lett.,
1999, 1021; R. Frankell, C. Birg, U. Kernbach, T. Habereder, H. Noth
and W. P. Fehlhammer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 1907.
8 (a) J. M. Brunel, O. Legrand and G. Buono, C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. IIC,
1999, 2, 19; (b) M. Gomez, G. Muller and M. Rocamora, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 1999, 195, 769; (c) L. C. Dias, Curr. Org. Chem., 2000, 4, 305.
9 (a) J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcia, V. Martinez-Merino, J. A. Mayoral and L.
Salvatella, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 7616; (b) M. P. Doyle and D.
C. Forbes, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 911.
Fig. 2 Thermal ellipsoid drawing of 5. Distances (Å) and angles (°): Cu1–
C22 2.008(13), Cu1–O1 1.979(7), Cu1–O2 1.958(6), Cu2–C12 1.971(15),
N1–C12–N2 105.4(14), N1–C12 1.38(2); Cu4 core inset.
Table 1 Results of copper catalysed conjugate additiona
Catalyst conc.
(mol %)
Conversion
(%)
Complex
Time/h
ee (%)
3b
3c
4a
4b
4c
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
100
78
72
98
60
51(S)
—
—
—
—
10 (a) H. Maeda, A. Osuka, Y. Ishikawa, I. Aritome, Y. Hisaeda and H.
Furuta, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 1293; (b) H. Furuta, H. Maeda and A. Osuka,
Chem. Commun., 2002, 1795.
11 A. Alexakis, C. L. Winn, F. Guillen, J. Pytkowicz, S. Roland and P.
Mangeney, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2003, 345, 345.
a All reactions at 230 °C under purified N2 atmosphere.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 6 1 2 – 1 6 1 3
1613